mirror of
https://github.com/MinimalBible/MinimalBible.github.io
synced 2024-11-14 03:58:29 -05:00
231 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
231 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
layout: post
|
|
title: "Why not Groovy?"
|
|
modified: 2014-09-01 13:36:35 -0400
|
|
tags: [groovy, dex, 64k, play services]
|
|
image:
|
|
feature:
|
|
credit:
|
|
creditlink:
|
|
comments:
|
|
share:
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
So, a while back one of the top Groovy developers released a version of Groovy that was [ready to run on Android](http://melix.github.io/blog/2014/06/grooid.html). Even beyond that, it comes with it's nice own [Gradle plugin](https://github.com/melix/groovy-android-gradle-plugin) so all you really have to do is add the plugin to build and wa-la! You're good to go!
|
|
|
|
Now, I would like to say first off that I do sincerely believe that using Groovy would drastically speed up development time. Being able to use closures is great, and I'm a huge fan of dynamic languages (I've spent a lot of time in Python development). Even the New York Times [is getting on board](http://open.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/08/18/getting-groovy-with-reactive-android/?_php=true&_type=blogs&module=BlogPost-Title&version=Blog%20Main&contentCollection=General&action=Click&pgtype=Blogs®ion=Body&_r=0).
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, it's simply not a possibility for me.
|
|
|
|
Because of the 64k method limit
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
So why won't I be using Groovy? Simply put, the 64k method limit for Dex.
|
|
|
|
This is a [well](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25607908/limit-of-methods-64k-per-a-dex-file-in-android) [documented](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15436956/how-to-solve-the-issue-with-dalvik-compiler-limitation-on-64k-methods) [issue](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21146959/dynamic-class-loading-with-intellij-64k-method-dex-issue) in many Android projects. The crux of the issue is this: the Android format only supports being able to call 65,536 methods in an application. And while you likely won't write anywhere near that many methods yourself, trying to depend on external libraries fast approaches that limit. So far as I can tell, there are 4 solutions to addressing this problem:
|
|
|
|
### Proguard ###
|
|
|
|
Proguard is a code obfuscation tool, that also uses static analysis to do some cool things. For example, Proguard can locate unused methods and strip them out of your application. Sounds nice, right? There are two problems.
|
|
|
|
1. Proguard takes a while to run. Even if it's only 30 seconds, that's an extra 30 seconds per build that you lose in development time. It adds up and its frustrating to boot.
|
|
|
|
2. Proguard isn't that great at removing methods. Proguard can only remove methods that aren't referred to by anyone else. So if you have a method that is unused during the application, but can still be reached, Proguard can't remove it. This is an issue especially in the Play services library - many methods will never be used, but Proguard can't guarantee that.
|
|
|
|
While eventually I'll be using Proguard for my release builds, in the mean time it would be painfully slow to wait 30 seconds every time to debug a build on my device.
|
|
|
|
### Dynamic Classloading ###
|
|
|
|
Google put up a [blog post](http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2011/07/custom-class-loading-in-dalvik.html) detailing how you can use Dynamic Classloading to circumvent the 64k method limit. The basic workflow is this:
|
|
|
|
1. Build a `.dex` file separate from your main application - this can contain an external library or whatever else is needed. This should be stored in your `assets/` folder.
|
|
|
|
2. Use code to load the external `.dex` file into memory
|
|
|
|
3. This is where it gets interesting. To actually use this new Dex file you **must either get classes via reflection and bind them to interfaces** (such that the interface contains the methods you need), or **call everything via reflection**.
|
|
|
|
But if you can accomplish all this, you're done. That said, while this works, it's practically impossible to write maintainable code with this. There's an incredible amount of reflection involved and needed to make this work, **and can not be accomplished in Eclipse** because it doesn't support the build complexity. This is hardly a solution.
|
|
|
|
### Native Interfaces ###
|
|
|
|
While I won't be investigating this one much, a similar solution would be to write as much of the code as possible in a native language (i.e. C++, C, etc.) and then call into that code using Java. Arguably this runs into similar issues as the Dynamic Classloading, but at least there's an API for it.
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, you can write Javascript for a WebView component and outsource most of your execution. The problem with this is you lose an incredible amount in terms of memory and performance. So while it would theoretically work, it would end up being painfully noticeable.
|
|
|
|
### Use fewer libraries ###
|
|
|
|
This unfortunately seems to be the most practical solution. I haven't done any benchmarking, but I'd be willing to guess the time it takes you to write the code yourself is less than the time it would take to implement a solution above. While it forces you to write lower-level code, it's not anywhere near the point of trying to use reflection to load a library at runtime.
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately you do become very limited in what external libraries you can use. There are a great number of productivity-boosting libraries and things available, but sacrifices have to be made.
|
|
|
|
Summary
|
|
-------
|
|
|
|
The 64k method limit in Dex is painful. And before you think that you'll never get anywhere near that limit, think about this:
|
|
|
|
* The Google Play Services library itself contains [20 thousand methods](http://jakewharton.com/play-services-is-a-monolith/). And you can't just use part of it. If you depend on Play services at all, one-third of your method count disappears
|
|
|
|
* To be fair, people have invented [ways of stripping out](https://medium.com/@rotxed/dex-skys-the-limit-no-65k-methods-is-28e6cb40cf71) components you don't need. But this is still ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
* The Groovy language implementation for Android uses roughly [30 thousand methods](#groovy-method). A full half of your method count is immediately gone if you try and use Groovy.
|
|
|
|
So while both Play Services and Groovy provide some great features, it's basically one or the other. You can't have both. The 64k method limit is a big problem, and prevents people from using some of the great technology available. While I understand this is a technical nightmare to solve, there isn't really an "official" solution from Google to work around this. So, due to practical concerns, I won't be using Groovy. Much as I'd like to.
|
|
|
|
P.S.
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
If you're interested to see how many methods are used in your application, check out the script [over here](https://github.com/mihaip/dex-method-counts). It's a fantastic resource.
|
|
|
|
Finally, I've attached below a method count for a bare-bones app compiled to use Groovy. Enjoy!
|
|
|
|
<a name="groovy-method">Groovy Method Count</a>
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Read in 31289 method IDs.
|
|
|
|
<root>: 31289
|
|
android: 5
|
|
app: 3
|
|
view: 2
|
|
com: 19
|
|
example: 17
|
|
bspeice: 17
|
|
testgroovy: 17
|
|
thoughtworks: 2
|
|
xstream: 2
|
|
groovy: 3483
|
|
beans: 111
|
|
grape: 430
|
|
inspect: 21
|
|
io: 59
|
|
lang: 1288
|
|
security: 2
|
|
time: 112
|
|
transform: 265
|
|
builder: 64
|
|
stc: 59
|
|
ui: 30
|
|
util: 1153
|
|
logging: 45
|
|
xml: 12
|
|
groovyjarjarantlr: 3072
|
|
ASdebug: 7
|
|
actions: 357
|
|
cpp: 81
|
|
csharp: 81
|
|
java: 80
|
|
python: 115
|
|
build: 22
|
|
collections: 129
|
|
impl: 89
|
|
debug: 393
|
|
misc: 23
|
|
preprocessor: 172
|
|
groovyjarjarasm: 1319
|
|
asm: 1319
|
|
commons: 451
|
|
signature: 41
|
|
tree: 254
|
|
util: 229
|
|
groovyjarjarcommonscli: 219
|
|
groovyjarjarharmonybeans: 174
|
|
editors: 88
|
|
internal: 10
|
|
nls: 10
|
|
groovyjarjaropenbeans: 815
|
|
beancontext: 208
|
|
java: 1342
|
|
applet: 2
|
|
awt: 51
|
|
event: 6
|
|
io: 179
|
|
lang: 562
|
|
annotation: 12
|
|
invoke: 44
|
|
ref: 12
|
|
reflect: 82
|
|
math: 41
|
|
net: 54
|
|
nio: 4
|
|
charset: 4
|
|
security: 18
|
|
sql: 5
|
|
text: 10
|
|
util: 416
|
|
concurrent: 32
|
|
atomic: 13
|
|
locks: 10
|
|
logging: 13
|
|
prefs: 12
|
|
regex: 17
|
|
javax: 74
|
|
swing: 71
|
|
event: 1
|
|
text: 2
|
|
tree: 2
|
|
xml: 3
|
|
parsers: 3
|
|
org: 20767
|
|
apache: 4
|
|
commons: 4
|
|
cli: 4
|
|
codehaus: 20749
|
|
groovy: 20749
|
|
antlr: 2013
|
|
java: 304
|
|
parser: 490
|
|
treewalker: 943
|
|
ast: 2269
|
|
builder: 660
|
|
expr: 500
|
|
stmt: 150
|
|
tools: 156
|
|
classgen: 1620
|
|
asm: 842
|
|
indy: 30
|
|
sc: 118
|
|
cli: 7
|
|
control: 928
|
|
customizers: 436
|
|
builder: 195
|
|
io: 29
|
|
messages: 24
|
|
plugin: 2
|
|
reflection: 381
|
|
android: 3
|
|
stdclasses: 69
|
|
runtime: 8887
|
|
callsite: 309
|
|
dgmimpl: 413
|
|
arrays: 190
|
|
m12n: 31
|
|
memoize: 38
|
|
metaclass: 463
|
|
powerassert: 30
|
|
typehandling: 731
|
|
wrappers: 30
|
|
syntax: 160
|
|
tools: 678
|
|
ast: 150
|
|
gse: 24
|
|
javac: 104
|
|
shell: 53
|
|
util: 38
|
|
transform: 3194
|
|
sc: 107
|
|
transformers: 61
|
|
stc: 585
|
|
tailrec: 1160
|
|
trait: 90
|
|
util: 395
|
|
vmplugin: 197
|
|
v5: 46
|
|
v6: 1
|
|
v7: 140
|
|
fusesource: 7
|
|
jansi: 7
|
|
xml: 7
|
|
sax: 7
|
|
helpers: 1
|
|
```
|