mirror-github-bspeice/speice.io
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bspeice/speice.io synced 2024-12-22 08:38:09 -05:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Note on technical similarities.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Bradlee Speice 2020-06-30 17:03:20 -04:00
parent 4337e74d6d
commit a458ea2dac
2 changed files with 7 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
Gemfile.lock
View File

@ -75,4 +75,4 @@ DEPENDENCIES
tzinfo-data
BUNDLED WITH
1.17.3
2.1.4

9
_posts/2020-06-29-release-the-gil-pt.-2.md
View File

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
layout: post
title: "Release the GIL: Part 2 - Pybind11, PyO3"
title: "Release the GIL: Pybind11, PyO3"
description: "More Python Parallelism"
category:
tags: [python, rust, c++]
@ -26,8 +26,11 @@ and Python", and they certainly deliver on that. Setting up a hybrid project whe
and Python (using setuptools) could coexist was straight-forward, and the repository also works as
[a template](https://github.com/speice-io/release-the-gil-pybind11/settings) for future projects.
TODO: Include anything about how Pybind11 and Cython are similar because of compilation to C++?
Maybe also talk about project setup being a good deal more complicated?
On a technical level, there's a great deal of overlap between Pybind11 and Cython. Where Pybind11
starts with C++ and facilitates interaction with the interpreter, Cython starts with a Python-like
language and facilitates interaction with other code written in C++. In a way, Pybind11 is for C++
developers who want to interact with Python, and Cython is for Python developers who want to
interact with C++.
Just like the previous post, we'll examine a simple Fibonacci sequence implementation to demonstrate
how Python's threading model interacts with Pybind11: