From fc83163b7173114ea52c561580ecc07ca2315a64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bradlee Speice <bradlee@speice.io>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:16:08 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Minor tweak

---
 _posts/2020-08-05-static-polymorphism.md | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/_posts/2020-08-05-static-polymorphism.md b/_posts/2020-08-05-static-polymorphism.md
index ab7e9f6..0661ba8 100644
--- a/_posts/2020-08-05-static-polymorphism.md
+++ b/_posts/2020-08-05-static-polymorphism.md
@@ -144,7 +144,8 @@ must be defined on the remote type.
 Rust makes this weird because you have to `use ClientExt` to bring the methods in scope, but the
 trait name might not show up because `impl ClientExt for RemoteStruct` is defined elsewhere.
 Alternately, `ClientExt: AnotherTrait` implementations where the default `ClientExt` implementation
-is used.
+is used. To do this, Rust compiles the entire crate as a single translation unit, and the orphan
+rule.
 
 # Automatic markers?