diff --git a/_drafts/case-study-borrow-checker.md b/_drafts/case-study-borrow-checker.md index 15344b2..d7e6114 100644 --- a/_drafts/case-study-borrow-checker.md +++ b/_drafts/case-study-borrow-checker.md @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ I'm convinced that WebSockets are a gateway drug. The specification is reasonabl At least, that's how I'm approaching it. While there are [existing](https://github.com/housleyjk/ws-rs) [implementations](https://github.com/websockets-rs/rust-websocket) of the protocol for Rust, writing a WebSocket library is an opportunity for me to experiment with parser [combinators](https://github.com/Geal/nom) and [generators](https://github.com/kaitai-io/kaitai_struct), and maybe have something to show at the end of it. Recently, I've been adding support for Rust to the [Kaitai Struct](http://kaitai.io/) project so that I can generate the parser from a schema, rather than writing one by hand. But before we can generate a parser using Kaitai, we need a runtime library. This is a typical pattern in code generation; the generated code relies on a "standard library" of functionality similar to how programming languages have their own standard library. -What makes this parser runtime difficult to implement in Rust is the performance concerns; we don't want to allocate new `Vec` buffers and copy data around when it's not necessary. Especially in networking code, these types of "zero-copy" operations are critical to performance. And because we're not interested in modifying the data stream, references make a lot of sense! However, that means there's a good potential to hit issues with the borrow checker; making sure all the structures being parsed use the stream correctly is difficult. As a result, I hit a lot of issues with the borrow checker, and wanted to detail what I learned about not only how to *avoid* fighting the borrow checker, but how to *work with* the borrow checker. +What makes this parser runtime difficult to implement in Rust is the performance concerns; we don't want to allocate new `Vec` buffers and copy data around when it's not necessary. Especially in networking code, these types of "zero-copy" operations are critical to performance. And because we're not interested in modifying the data stream, references make a lot of sense! However, that means there's a good potential to hit issues with the borrow checker; making sure all the structures being parsed use the stream correctly is difficult. As a result, I hit a lot of issues with the borrow checker, and wanted to detail what I learned. + +This article will outline how the Rust runtime has evolved to work within the constraints imposed by the language, and hopefully provide guidance on how to *work with* the borrow checker, rather than just trying to avoid it altogether. # Design Inspiration - C++ @@ -52,6 +54,23 @@ The parser will operate like this: So let's start by generating the C++ code corresponding to our specification (edited for clarity): +**kaitaistruct.h** (the runtime header) +```cpp +namespace kaitai { + +class kstruct { +public: + kstruct(kstream *_io) { m__io = _io; } + virtual ~kstruct() {} +protected: + kstream *m__io; +public: + kstream *_io() { return m__io; } +}; + +} +``` + **toy.h** ```cpp class toy_t : public kaitai::kstruct { @@ -142,4 +161,3 @@ Now, let's think about ownership as we look at the code: - The root structure (`toy_t`) stores a reference to itself; it's thus unsafe to copy or move. With all that in mind, let's talk about ownership in the Rust runtime. -