mirror-github-bspeice/speice.io
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bspeice/speice.io synced 2024-12-22 08:38:09 -05:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Actually format everything

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Bradlee Speice 2020-06-29 16:00:26 -04:00
parent e02556a770
commit b8c12b9cc1
17 changed files with 1217 additions and 889 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

20
_posts/2018-05-28-hello.md
View File

@ -6,9 +6,11 @@ category:
tags: []
---
I'll do what I can to keep this short, there's plenty of other things we both should be doing right now.
I'll do what I can to keep this short, there's plenty of other things we both should be doing right
now.
If you're here for the bread pics, and to marvel in some other culinary side projects, I've got you covered:
If you're here for the bread pics, and to marvel in some other culinary side projects, I've got you
covered:
![Saturday Bread]({{ "/assets/images/2018-05-28-bread.jpg" | absolute_url }})
@ -18,15 +20,15 @@ Okay, just one:
![Bread as rock]({{ "/assets/images/2018-05-28-rocks.jpg" | absolute_url }})
If you're here for keeping up with the man Bradlee Speice, got plenty of that too. Plus some up-coming
super-nerdy posts about how I'm changing the world.
If you're here for keeping up with the man Bradlee Speice, got plenty of that too. Plus some
up-coming super-nerdy posts about how I'm changing the world.
And if you're not here for those things: don't have a lot for you, sorry. But you're welcome to let me know
what needs to change.
And if you're not here for those things: don't have a lot for you, sorry. But you're welcome to let
me know what needs to change.
I'm looking forward to making this a place to talk about what's going on in life, I hope you'll stick it out with me.
The best way to follow what's going on is on my [About](/about/) page, but if you want the joy of clicking links,
here's a few good ones:
I'm looking forward to making this a place to talk about what's going on in life, I hope you'll
stick it out with me. The best way to follow what's going on is on my [About](/about/) page, but if
you want the joy of clicking links, here's a few good ones:
- Email (people still use this?): [bradlee@speice.io](mailto:bradlee@speice.io)
- Mastodon (nerd Twitter): [@bradlee](https://mastodon.social/@bradlee)

174
_posts/2018-06-25-dateutil-parser-to-rust.md
View File

@ -20,142 +20,158 @@ what to do with your life (but you should totally keep reading).
OK, fine, I guess I should start with _why_ someone would do this.
[Dateutil](https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil) is a Python library for handling dates.
The standard library support for time in Python is kinda dope, but there are a lot of extras
that go into making it useful beyond just the [datetime](https://docs.python.org/3.6/library/datetime.html)
module. `dateutil.parser` specifically is code to take all the super-weird time formats people
come up with and turn them into something actually useful.
[Dateutil](https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil) is a Python library for handling dates. The
standard library support for time in Python is kinda dope, but there are a lot of extras that go
into making it useful beyond just the [datetime](https://docs.python.org/3.6/library/datetime.html)
module. `dateutil.parser` specifically is code to take all the super-weird time formats people come
up with and turn them into something actually useful.
Date/time parsing, it turns out, is just like everything else involving
[computers](https://infiniteundo.com/post/25326999628/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-time)
and [time](https://infiniteundo.com/post/25509354022/more-falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-time):
it feels like it shouldn't be that difficult to do, until you try to do it,
and you realize that people suck and this is why [we can't we have nice things](https://zachholman.com/talk/utc-is-enough-for-everyone-right).
But alas, we'll try and make contemporary art out of the rubble and give it a
pretentious name like _Time_.
[computers](https://infiniteundo.com/post/25326999628/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-time) and
[time](https://infiniteundo.com/post/25509354022/more-falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-time): it
feels like it shouldn't be that difficult to do, until you try to do it, and you realize that people
suck and this is why
[we can't we have nice things](https://zachholman.com/talk/utc-is-enough-for-everyone-right). But
alas, we'll try and make contemporary art out of the rubble and give it a pretentious name like
_Time_.
![A gravel mound](/assets/images/2018-06-25-gravel-mound.jpg)
> [Time](https://www.goodfreephotos.com/united-states/montana/elkhorn/remains-of-the-mining-operation-elkhorn.jpg.php)
What makes `dateutil.parser` great is that there's single function with a single argument that drives
what programmers interact with: [`parse(timestr)`](https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/blob/6dde5d6298cfb81a4c594a38439462799ed2aef2/dateutil/parser/_parser.py#L1258).
It takes in the time as a string, and gives you back a reasonable "look, this is the best
anyone can possibly do to make sense of your input" value. It doesn't expect much of you.
What makes `dateutil.parser` great is that there's single function with a single argument that
drives what programmers interact with:
[`parse(timestr)`](https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/blob/6dde5d6298cfb81a4c594a38439462799ed2aef2/dateutil/parser/_parser.py#L1258).
It takes in the time as a string, and gives you back a reasonable "look, this is the best anyone can
possibly do to make sense of your input" value. It doesn't expect much of you.
[And now it's in Rust.](https://github.com/bspeice/dtparse/blob/7d565d3a78876dbebd9711c9720364fe9eba7915/src/lib.rs#L1332)
# Lost in Translation
Having worked at a bulge-bracket bank watching Java programmers try to be Python programmers,
I'm admittedly hesitant to publish Python code that's trying to be Rust.
Interestingly, Rust code can actually do a great job of mimicking Python.
It's certainly not idiomatic Rust, but I've had better experiences
than [this guy](https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:wkYMpktJtnUJ:https://jackstouffer.com/blog/porting_dateutil.html+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us)
Having worked at a bulge-bracket bank watching Java programmers try to be Python programmers, I'm
admittedly hesitant to publish Python code that's trying to be Rust. Interestingly, Rust code can
actually do a great job of mimicking Python. It's certainly not idiomatic Rust, but I've had better
experiences than
[this guy](https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:wkYMpktJtnUJ:https://jackstouffer.com/blog/porting_dateutil.html+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us)
who attempted the same thing for D. These are the actual take-aways:
When transcribing code, **stay as close to the original library as possible**. I'm talking
about using the same variable names, same access patterns, the whole shebang.
It's way too easy to make a couple of typos, and all of a sudden
your code blows up in new and exciting ways. Having a reference manual for verbatim
what your code should be means that you don't spend that long debugging complicated logic,
you're more looking for typos.
When transcribing code, **stay as close to the original library as possible**. I'm talking about
using the same variable names, same access patterns, the whole shebang. It's way too easy to make a
couple of typos, and all of a sudden your code blows up in new and exciting ways. Having a reference
manual for verbatim what your code should be means that you don't spend that long debugging
complicated logic, you're more looking for typos.
Also, **don't use nice Rust things like enums**. While
[one time it worked out OK for me](https://github.com/bspeice/dtparse/blob/7d565d3a78876dbebd9711c9720364fe9eba7915/src/lib.rs#L88-L94),
I also managed to shoot myself in the foot a couple times because `dateutil` stores AM/PM as a boolean
and I mixed up which was true, and which was false (side note: AM is false, PM is true).
In general, writing nice code _should not be a first-pass priority_ when you're just trying to recreate
I also managed to shoot myself in the foot a couple times because `dateutil` stores AM/PM as a
boolean and I mixed up which was true, and which was false (side note: AM is false, PM is true). In
general, writing nice code _should not be a first-pass priority_ when you're just trying to recreate
the same functionality.
**Exceptions are a pain.** Make peace with it. Python code is just allowed to skip stack frames.
So when a co-worker told me "Rust is getting try-catch syntax" I properly freaked out.
Turns out [he's not quite right](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/243), and I'm OK with that.
And while `dateutil` is pretty well-behaved about not skipping multiple stack frames,
**Exceptions are a pain.** Make peace with it. Python code is just allowed to skip stack frames. So
when a co-worker told me "Rust is getting try-catch syntax" I properly freaked out. Turns out
[he's not quite right](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/243), and I'm OK with that. And while
`dateutil` is pretty well-behaved about not skipping multiple stack frames,
[130-line try-catch blocks](https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/blob/16561fc99361979e88cccbd135393b06b1af7e90/dateutil/parser/_parser.py#L730-L865)
take a while to verify.
As another Python quirk, **be very careful about [long nested if-elif-else blocks](https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/blob/16561fc99361979e88cccbd135393b06b1af7e90/dateutil/parser/_parser.py#L494-L568)**.
I used to think that Python's whitespace was just there
to get you to format your code correctly. I think that no longer. It's way too easy
to close a block too early and have incredibly weird issues in the logic. Make sure you use an editor that displays
indentation levels so you can keep things straight.
As another Python quirk, **be very careful about
[long nested if-elif-else blocks](https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/blob/16561fc99361979e88cccbd135393b06b1af7e90/dateutil/parser/_parser.py#L494-L568)**.
I used to think that Python's whitespace was just there to get you to format your code correctly. I
think that no longer. It's way too easy to close a block too early and have incredibly weird issues
in the logic. Make sure you use an editor that displays indentation levels so you can keep things
straight.
**Rust macros are not free.** I originally had the
[main test body](https://github.com/bspeice/dtparse/blob/b0e737f088eca8e83ab4244c6621a2797d247697/tests/compat.rs#L63-L217)
wrapped up in a macro using [pyo3](https://github.com/PyO3/PyO3). It took two minutes to compile. After
wrapped up in a macro using [pyo3](https://github.com/PyO3/PyO3). It took two minutes to compile.
After
[moving things to a function](https://github.com/bspeice/dtparse/blob/e017018295c670e4b6c6ee1cfff00dbb233db47d/tests/compat.rs#L76-L205)
compile times dropped down to ~5 seconds. Turns out 150 lines \* 100 tests = a lot of redundant code to be compiled.
My new rule of thumb is that any macros longer than 10-15 lines are actually functions that need to be liberated, man.
compile times dropped down to ~5 seconds. Turns out 150 lines \* 100 tests = a lot of redundant code
to be compiled. My new rule of thumb is that any macros longer than 10-15 lines are actually
functions that need to be liberated, man.
Finally, **I really miss list comprehensions and dictionary comprehensions.**
As a quick comparison, see
Finally, **I really miss list comprehensions and dictionary comprehensions.** As a quick comparison,
see
[this dateutil code](https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/blob/16561fc99361979e88cccbd135393b06b1af7e90/dateutil/parser/_parser.py#L476)
and [the implementation in Rust](https://github.com/bspeice/dtparse/blob/7d565d3a78876dbebd9711c9720364fe9eba7915/src/lib.rs#L619-L629).
I probably wrote it wrong, and I'm sorry. Ultimately though, I hope that these comprehensions can be added through macros or syntax extensions.
Either way, they're expressive, save typing, and are super-readable. Let's get more of that.
and
[the implementation in Rust](https://github.com/bspeice/dtparse/blob/7d565d3a78876dbebd9711c9720364fe9eba7915/src/lib.rs#L619-L629).
I probably wrote it wrong, and I'm sorry. Ultimately though, I hope that these comprehensions can be
added through macros or syntax extensions. Either way, they're expressive, save typing, and are
super-readable. Let's get more of that.
# Using a young language
Now, Rust is exciting and new, which means that there's opportunity to make a substantive impact.
On more than one occasion though, I've had issues navigating the Rust ecosystem.
Now, Rust is exciting and new, which means that there's opportunity to make a substantive impact. On
more than one occasion though, I've had issues navigating the Rust ecosystem.
What I'll call the "canonical library" is still being built. In Python, if you need datetime parsing,
you use `dateutil`. If you want `decimal` types, it's already in the
[standard library](https://docs.python.org/3.6/library/decimal.html). While I might've gotten away with `f64`,
`dateutil` uses decimals, and I wanted to follow the principle of **staying as close to the original library as possible**.
Thus began my quest to find a decimal library in Rust. What I quickly found was summarized
in a comment:
What I'll call the "canonical library" is still being built. In Python, if you need datetime
parsing, you use `dateutil`. If you want `decimal` types, it's already in the
[standard library](https://docs.python.org/3.6/library/decimal.html). While I might've gotten away
with `f64`, `dateutil` uses decimals, and I wanted to follow the principle of **staying as close to
the original library as possible**. Thus began my quest to find a decimal library in Rust. What I
quickly found was summarized in a comment:
> Writing a BigDecimal is easy. Writing a _good_ BigDecimal is hard.
>
> [-cmr](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/8937#issuecomment-34582794)
In practice, this means that there are at least [4](https://crates.io/crates/bigdecimal)
[different](https://crates.io/crates/rust_decimal) [implementations](https://crates.io/crates/decimal)
[available](https://crates.io/crates/decimate). And that's a lot of decisions to worry about
when all I'm thinking is "why can't [calendar reform](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendar_reform) be a thing"
and I'm forced to dig through a [couple](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/8937#issuecomment-31661916)
[different](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/334) [threads](https://github.com/rust-num/num/issues/8)
to figure out if the library I'm look at is dead or just stable.
[different](https://crates.io/crates/rust_decimal)
[implementations](https://crates.io/crates/decimal) [available](https://crates.io/crates/decimate).
And that's a lot of decisions to worry about when all I'm thinking is "why can't
[calendar reform](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendar_reform) be a thing" and I'm forced to dig
through a [couple](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/8937#issuecomment-31661916)
[different](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/334)
[threads](https://github.com/rust-num/num/issues/8) to figure out if the library I'm look at is dead
or just stable.
And even when the "canonical library" exists, there's no guarantees that it will be well-maintained.
[Chrono](https://github.com/chronotope/chrono) is the _de facto_ date/time library in Rust,
and just released version 0.4.4 like two days ago. Meanwhile, [chrono-tz](https://github.com/chronotope/chrono-tz)
appears to be dead in the water even though [there are people happy to help maintain it](https://github.com/chronotope/chrono-tz/issues/19).
I know relatively little about it, but it appears that most of the release process is automated; keeping
that up to date should be a no-brainer.
[Chrono](https://github.com/chronotope/chrono) is the _de facto_ date/time library in Rust, and just
released version 0.4.4 like two days ago. Meanwhile,
[chrono-tz](https://github.com/chronotope/chrono-tz) appears to be dead in the water even though
[there are people happy to help maintain it](https://github.com/chronotope/chrono-tz/issues/19). I
know relatively little about it, but it appears that most of the release process is automated;
keeping that up to date should be a no-brainer.
## Trial Maintenance Policy
Specifically given "maintenance" being an [oft-discussed](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/48540g/thoughts_on_initiators_vs_maintainers/)
Specifically given "maintenance" being an
[oft-discussed](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/48540g/thoughts_on_initiators_vs_maintainers/)
issue, I'm going to try out the following policy to keep things moving on `dtparse`:
1. Issues/PRs needing _maintainer_ feedback will be updated at least weekly. I want to make sure nobody's blocking on me.
1. Issues/PRs needing _maintainer_ feedback will be updated at least weekly. I want to make sure
nobody's blocking on me.
2. To keep issues/PRs needing _contributor_ feedback moving, I'm going to (kindly) ask the contributor to check in after two weeks,
and close the issue without resolution if I hear nothing back after a month.
2. To keep issues/PRs needing _contributor_ feedback moving, I'm going to (kindly) ask the
contributor to check in after two weeks, and close the issue without resolution if I hear nothing
back after a month.
The second point I think has the potential to be a bit controversial, so I'm happy to receive feedback on that.
And if a contributor responds with "hey, still working on it, had a kid and I'm running on 30 seconds of sleep a night,"
then first: congratulations on sustaining human life. And second: I don't mind keeping those requests going indefinitely.
I just want to try and balance keeping things moving with giving people the necessary time they need.
The second point I think has the potential to be a bit controversial, so I'm happy to receive
feedback on that. And if a contributor responds with "hey, still working on it, had a kid and I'm
running on 30 seconds of sleep a night," then first: congratulations on sustaining human life. And
second: I don't mind keeping those requests going indefinitely. I just want to try and balance
keeping things moving with giving people the necessary time they need.
I should also note that I'm still getting some best practices in place - CONTRIBUTING and CONTRIBUTORS files
need to be added, as well as issue/PR templates. In progress. None of us are perfect.
I should also note that I'm still getting some best practices in place - CONTRIBUTING and
CONTRIBUTORS files need to be added, as well as issue/PR templates. In progress. None of us are
perfect.
# Roadmap and Conclusion
So if I've now built a `dateutil`-compatible parser, we're done, right? Of course not! That's not
nearly ambitious enough.
Ultimately, I'd love to have a library that's capable of parsing everything the Linux `date`
command can do (and not `date` on OSX, because seriously, BSD coreutils are the worst). I know Rust has a
Ultimately, I'd love to have a library that's capable of parsing everything the Linux `date` command
can do (and not `date` on OSX, because seriously, BSD coreutils are the worst). I know Rust has a
coreutils rewrite going on, and `dtparse` would potentially be an interesting candidate since it
doesn't bring in a lot of extra dependencies. [`humantime`](https://crates.io/crates/humantime)
could help pick up some of the (current) slack in dtparse, so maybe we can share and care with each other?
could help pick up some of the (current) slack in dtparse, so maybe we can share and care with each
other?
All in all, I'm mostly hoping that nobody's already done this and I haven't spent a bit over a month
on redundant code. So if it exists, tell me. I need to know, but be nice about it, because I'm going to take it hard.
on redundant code. So if it exists, tell me. I need to know, but be nice about it, because I'm going
to take it hard.
And in the mean time, I'm looking forward to building more. Onwards.

107
_posts/2018-09-01-primitives-in-rust-are-weird.md
View File

@ -15,22 +15,23 @@ fn main() {
}
```
And to my complete befuddlement, it compiled, ran, and produced a completely sensible output.
The reason I was so surprised has to do with how Rust treats a special category of things
I'm going to call _primitives_. In the current version of the Rust book, you'll see them
referred to as [scalars][rust_scalar], and in older versions they'll be called [primitives][rust_primitive],
but we're going to stick with the name _primitive_ for the time being. Explaining
why this program is so cool requires talking about a number of other programming languages,
and keeping a consistent terminology makes things easier.
And to my complete befuddlement, it compiled, ran, and produced a completely sensible output. The
reason I was so surprised has to do with how Rust treats a special category of things I'm going to
call _primitives_. In the current version of the Rust book, you'll see them referred to as
[scalars][rust_scalar], and in older versions they'll be called [primitives][rust_primitive], but
we're going to stick with the name _primitive_ for the time being. Explaining why this program is so
cool requires talking about a number of other programming languages, and keeping a consistent
terminology makes things easier.
**You've been warned:** this is going to be a tedious post about a relatively minor issue that involves
Java, Python, C, and x86 Assembly. And also me pretending like I know what I'm talking about with assembly.
**You've been warned:** this is going to be a tedious post about a relatively minor issue that
involves Java, Python, C, and x86 Assembly. And also me pretending like I know what I'm talking
about with assembly.
# Defining primitives (Java)
The reason I'm using the name _primitive_ comes from how much of my life is Java right now.
Spoiler alert: a lot of it. And for the most part I like Java, but I digress. In Java, there's a
special name for some specific types of values:
The reason I'm using the name _primitive_ comes from how much of my life is Java right now. Spoiler
alert: a lot of it. And for the most part I like Java, but I digress. In Java, there's a special
name for some specific types of values:
> ```
> bool char byte
@ -70,8 +71,8 @@ the fields and methods they define can be used. In contrast, _primitive types ar
there's nothing to be dereferenced. In memory, they're just a sequence of bits.
If we really want, we can turn the `int` into an
[`Integer`](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/10/docs/api/java/lang/Integer.html) and then
dereference it, but it's a bit wasteful:
[`Integer`](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/10/docs/api/java/lang/Integer.html) and then dereference
it, but it's a bit wasteful:
```java
class Main {
@ -89,9 +90,9 @@ differently, but we have to dig into the low-level details to see it in action.
# Low Level Handling of Primitives (C)
We first need to build a foundation for reading and understanding the assembly code the
final answer requires. Let's begin with showing how the `C` language (and your computer)
thinks about "primitive" values in memory:
We first need to build a foundation for reading and understanding the assembly code the final answer
requires. Let's begin with showing how the `C` language (and your computer) thinks about "primitive"
values in memory:
```c
void my_function(int num) {}
@ -102,8 +103,9 @@ int main() {
}
```
The [compiler explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/lgNYcc) gives us an easy way of showing off
the assembly-level code that's generated: <span style="font-size:.6em">whose output has been lightly edited</span>
The [compiler explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/lgNYcc) gives us an easy way of showing off the
assembly-level code that's generated: <span style="font-size:.6em">whose output has been lightly
edited</span>
```nasm
main:
@ -139,8 +141,9 @@ my_function:
ret
```
At a really low level of memory, we're copying bits around using the [`mov`][x86_guide] instruction; nothing crazy.
But to show how similar Rust is, let's take a look at our program translated from C to Rust:
At a really low level of memory, we're copying bits around using the [`mov`][x86_guide] instruction;
nothing crazy. But to show how similar Rust is, let's take a look at our program translated from C
to Rust:
```rust
fn my_function(x: i32) {}
@ -151,8 +154,9 @@ fn main() {
}
```
And the assembly generated when we stick it in the [compiler explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/cAlmk0):
<span style="font-size:.6em">again, lightly edited</span>
And the assembly generated when we stick it in the
[compiler explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/cAlmk0): <span style="font-size:.6em">again, lightly
edited</span>
```nasm
example::main:
@ -178,22 +182,23 @@ example::my_function:
ret
```
The generated Rust assembly is functionally pretty close to the C assembly:
_When working with primitives, we're just dealing with bits in memory_.
The generated Rust assembly is functionally pretty close to the C assembly: _When working with
primitives, we're just dealing with bits in memory_.
In Java we have to dereference a pointer to call its functions; in Rust, there's no pointer to dereference. So what
exactly is going on with this `.to_string()` function call?
In Java we have to dereference a pointer to call its functions; in Rust, there's no pointer to
dereference. So what exactly is going on with this `.to_string()` function call?
# impl primitive (and Python)
Now it's time to <strike>reveal my trap card</strike> show the revelation that tied all this together: _Rust has
implementations for its primitive types._ That's right, `impl` blocks aren't only for `structs` and `traits`,
primitives get them too. Don't believe me? Check out [u32](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.u32.html),
[f64](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.f64.html) and [char](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.char.html)
as examples.
Now it's time to <strike>reveal my trap card</strike> show the revelation that tied all this
together: _Rust has implementations for its primitive types._ That's right, `impl` blocks aren't
only for `structs` and `traits`, primitives get them too. Don't believe me? Check out
[u32](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.u32.html),
[f64](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.f64.html) and
[char](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.char.html) as examples.
But the really interesting bit is how Rust turns those `impl` blocks into assembly. Let's break out the
[compiler explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/6LBEwq) once again:
But the really interesting bit is how Rust turns those `impl` blocks into assembly. Let's break out
the [compiler explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/6LBEwq) once again:
```rust
pub fn main() {
@ -220,16 +225,16 @@ example::main:
```
Now, this assembly is a bit more complicated, but here's the big revelation: **we're calling
`to_string()` as a function that exists all on its own, and giving it the instance of `8`**.
Instead of thinking of the value 8 as an instance of `u32` and then peeking in to find
the location of the function we want to call (like Java), we have a function that exists
outside of the instance and just give that function the value `8`.
`to_string()` as a function that exists all on its own, and giving it the instance of `8`**. Instead
of thinking of the value 8 as an instance of `u32` and then peeking in to find the location of the
function we want to call (like Java), we have a function that exists outside of the instance and
just give that function the value `8`.
This is an incredibly technical detail, but the interesting idea I had was this:
_if `to_string()` is a static function, can I refer to the unbound function and give it an instance?_
This is an incredibly technical detail, but the interesting idea I had was this: _if `to_string()`
is a static function, can I refer to the unbound function and give it an instance?_
Better explained in code (and a [compiler explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/fJY-gA) link
because I seriously love this thing):
Better explained in code (and a [compiler explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/fJY-gA) link because I
seriously love this thing):
```rust
struct MyVal {
@ -255,8 +260,8 @@ Rust is totally fine "binding" the function call to the instance, and also as a
MIND == BLOWN.
Python does the same thing where I can both call functions bound to their instances
and also call as an unbound function where I give it the instance:
Python does the same thing where I can both call functions bound to their instances and also call as
an unbound function where I give it the instance:
```python
class MyClass():
@ -297,18 +302,18 @@ SyntaxError: invalid syntax
...but in practice it's a bit complicated.
So while Python handles binding instance methods in a way similar to Rust, it's still not able
to run the example we started with.
So while Python handles binding instance methods in a way similar to Rust, it's still not able to
run the example we started with.
# Conclusion
This was a super-roundabout way of demonstrating it, but the way Rust handles incredibly minor details
like primitives leads to really cool effects. Primitives are optimized like C in how they have a
space-efficient memory layout, yet the language still has a lot of features I enjoy in Python
This was a super-roundabout way of demonstrating it, but the way Rust handles incredibly minor
details like primitives leads to really cool effects. Primitives are optimized like C in how they
have a space-efficient memory layout, yet the language still has a lot of features I enjoy in Python
(like both instance and late binding).
And when you put it together, there are areas where Rust does cool things nobody else can;
as a quirky feature of Rust's type system, `8.to_string()` is actually valid code.
And when you put it together, there are areas where Rust does cool things nobody else can; as a
quirky feature of Rust's type system, `8.to_string()` is actually valid code.
Now go forth and fool your friends into thinking you know assembly. This is all I've got.

215
_posts/2018-09-15-isomorphic-apps.md
View File

@ -7,29 +7,32 @@ tags: [rust, javascript, webassembly]
---
Forgive me, but this is going to be a bit of a schizophrenic post. I both despise Javascript and the
modern ECMAScript ecosystem, and I'm stunned by its success doing some really cool things.
It's [this duality](https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/the-birth-and-death-of-javascript)
that's led me to a couple of (very) late nights over the past weeks trying to reconcile myself as
I bootstrap a simple desktop application.
modern ECMAScript ecosystem, and I'm stunned by its success doing some really cool things. It's
[this duality](https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/the-birth-and-death-of-javascript) that's
led me to a couple of (very) late nights over the past weeks trying to reconcile myself as I
bootstrap a simple desktop application.
See, as much as [Webassembly isn't trying to replace Javascript](https://webassembly.org/docs/faq/#is-webassembly-trying-to-replace-javascript),
**I want Javascript gone**. There are plenty of people who don't share my views, and they are probably
nicer and more fun at parties. But I cringe every time "Webpack" is mentioned, and I think it's hilarious
that the [language specification](https://ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-402.htm)
dramatically outpaces anyone's [actual implementation](https://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es2016plus/).
The answer to this conundrum is of course to recompile code from newer versions of the language to
older versions _of the same language_ before running. At least [Babel] is a nice tongue-in-cheek reference.
See, as much as
[Webassembly isn't trying to replace Javascript](https://webassembly.org/docs/faq/#is-webassembly-trying-to-replace-javascript),
**I want Javascript gone**. There are plenty of people who don't share my views, and they are
probably nicer and more fun at parties. But I cringe every time "Webpack" is mentioned, and I think
it's hilarious that the
[language specification](https://ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-402.htm)
dramatically outpaces anyone's
[actual implementation](https://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es2016plus/). The answer to this
conundrum is of course to recompile code from newer versions of the language to older versions _of
the same language_ before running. At least [Babel] is a nice tongue-in-cheek reference.
Yet for as much hate as [Electron] receives, it does a stunningly good job at solving
a really hard problem: _how the hell do I put a button on the screen and react when the user clicks it_?
GUI programming is hard, straight up. But if browsers are already able to run everywhere, why don't
we take advantage of someone else solving the hard problems for us? I don't like that I have to use
Yet for as much hate as [Electron] receives, it does a stunningly good job at solving a really hard
problem: _how the hell do I put a button on the screen and react when the user clicks it_? GUI
programming is hard, straight up. But if browsers are already able to run everywhere, why don't we
take advantage of someone else solving the hard problems for us? I don't like that I have to use
Javascript for it, but I really don't feel inclined to whip out good ol' [wxWidgets].
Now there are other native solutions ([libui-rs], [conrod], [oh hey wxWdidgets again!][wxrust]),
but those also have their own issues with distribution, styling, etc. With Electron, I can
`yarn create electron-app my-app` and just get going, knowing that packaging/upgrades/etc.
are built in.
Now there are other native solutions ([libui-rs], [conrod], [oh hey wxWdidgets again!][wxrust]), but
those also have their own issues with distribution, styling, etc. With Electron, I can
`yarn create electron-app my-app` and just get going, knowing that packaging/upgrades/etc. are built
in.
My question is: given recent innovations with WASM, _are we Electron yet_?
@ -39,25 +42,28 @@ Instead, **what would it take to get to a point where we can skip Javascript in
# Setting the Stage
Truth is, WASM/Webassembly is a pretty new technology and I'm a total beginner in this area.
There may already be solutions to the issues I discuss, but I'm totally unaware of them,
so I'm going to try and organize what I did manage to discover.
Truth is, WASM/Webassembly is a pretty new technology and I'm a total beginner in this area. There
may already be solutions to the issues I discuss, but I'm totally unaware of them, so I'm going to
try and organize what I did manage to discover.
I should also mention that the content and things I'm talking about here are not intended to be prescriptive,
but more "if someone else is interested, what do we already know doesn't work?" _I expect everything in this post to be obsolete
within two months._ Even over the course of writing this, [a separate blog post](https://mnt.io/2018/08/28/from-rust-to-beyond-the-asm-js-galaxy/)
had to be modified because [upstream changes](https://github.com/WebAssembly/binaryen/pull/1642)
broke a [Rust tool](https://github.com/rustwasm/wasm-bindgen/pull/787) the post tried to use.
The post ultimately [got updated](https://mnt.io/2018/08/28/from-rust-to-beyond-the-asm-js-galaxy/#comment-477),
**but all this happened within the span of a week.** Things are moving quickly.
I should also mention that the content and things I'm talking about here are not intended to be
prescriptive, but more "if someone else is interested, what do we already know doesn't work?" _I
expect everything in this post to be obsolete within two months._ Even over the course of writing
this, [a separate blog post](https://mnt.io/2018/08/28/from-rust-to-beyond-the-asm-js-galaxy/) had
to be modified because [upstream changes](https://github.com/WebAssembly/binaryen/pull/1642) broke a
[Rust tool](https://github.com/rustwasm/wasm-bindgen/pull/787) the post tried to use. The post
ultimately
[got updated](https://mnt.io/2018/08/28/from-rust-to-beyond-the-asm-js-galaxy/#comment-477), **but
all this happened within the span of a week.** Things are moving quickly.
I'll also note that we're going to skip [asm.js] and [emscripten]. Truth be told, I couldn't get either of these
to output anything, and so I'm just going to say [here be dragons.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Here_be_dragons)
Everything I'm discussing here uses the `wasm32-unknown-unknown` target.
I'll also note that we're going to skip [asm.js] and [emscripten]. Truth be told, I couldn't get
either of these to output anything, and so I'm just going to say
[here be dragons.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Here_be_dragons) Everything I'm discussing here
uses the `wasm32-unknown-unknown` target.
The code that I _did_ get running is available [over here](https://github.com/speice-io/isomorphic-rust).
Feel free to use it as a starting point, but I'm mostly including the link as a reference for the things
that were attempted.
The code that I _did_ get running is available
[over here](https://github.com/speice-io/isomorphic-rust). Feel free to use it as a starting point,
but I'm mostly including the link as a reference for the things that were attempted.
# An Example Running Application
@ -73,32 +79,33 @@ cd isomorphic_rust/percy
yarn install && yarn start
```
...but I wouldn't really call it a "high quality" starting point to base future work on. It's mostly there
to prove this is possible in the first place. And that's something to be proud of!
There's a huge amount of engineering that went into showing a window with the text "It's alive!".
...but I wouldn't really call it a "high quality" starting point to base future work on. It's mostly
there to prove this is possible in the first place. And that's something to be proud of! There's a
huge amount of engineering that went into showing a window with the text "It's alive!".
There's also a lot of usability issues that prevent me from recommending anyone try Electron and WASM apps
at the moment, and I think that's the more important thing to discuss.
There's also a lot of usability issues that prevent me from recommending anyone try Electron and
WASM apps at the moment, and I think that's the more important thing to discuss.
# Issue the First: Complicated Toolchains
I quickly established that [wasm-bindgen] was necessary to "link" my Rust code to Javascript. At that point
you've got an Electron app that starts an HTML page which ultimately fetches your WASM blob. To keep things simple,
the goal was to package everything using [webpack] so that I could just load a `bundle.js` file on the page.
That decision was to be the last thing that kinda worked in this process.
I quickly established that [wasm-bindgen] was necessary to "link" my Rust code to Javascript. At
that point you've got an Electron app that starts an HTML page which ultimately fetches your WASM
blob. To keep things simple, the goal was to package everything using [webpack] so that I could just
load a `bundle.js` file on the page. That decision was to be the last thing that kinda worked in
this process.
The first issue [I ran into](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/98lpun/unable_to_load_wasm_for_electron_application/)
The first issue
[I ran into](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/98lpun/unable_to_load_wasm_for_electron_application/)
while attempting to bundle everything via `webpack` is a detail in the WASM spec:
> This function accepts a Response object, or a promise for one, and ...
> **[if it] does not match the `application/wasm` MIME type**, the returned promise
> will be rejected with a TypeError;
> This function accepts a Response object, or a promise for one, and ... **[if > it] does not match
> the `application/wasm` MIME type**, the returned promise will be rejected with a TypeError;
>
> [WebAssembly - Additional Web Embedding API](https://webassembly.org/docs/web/#additional-web-embedding-api)
Specifically, if you try and load a WASM blob without the MIME type set, you'll get an error.
On the web this isn't a huge issue, as the server can set MIME types when delivering the blob.
With Electron, you're resolving things with a `file://` URL and thus can't control the MIME type:
Specifically, if you try and load a WASM blob without the MIME type set, you'll get an error. On the
web this isn't a huge issue, as the server can set MIME types when delivering the blob. With
Electron, you're resolving things with a `file://` URL and thus can't control the MIME type:
![TypeError: Incorrect response MIME type. Expected 'application/wasm'.](/assets/images/2018-09-15-incorrect-MIME-type.png)
@ -108,9 +115,10 @@ There are a couple of solutions depending on how far into the deep end you care
- Use a [custom protocol](https://electronjs.org/docs/api/protocol) and custom protocol handler
- Host your WASM blob on a website that you resolve at runtime
But all these are pretty bad solutions and defeat the purpose of using WASM in the first place. Instead,
my workaround was to [open a PR with `webpack`](https://github.com/webpack/webpack/issues/7918) and
use regex to remove calls to `instantiateStreaming` in the
But all these are pretty bad solutions and defeat the purpose of using WASM in the first place.
Instead, my workaround was to
[open a PR with `webpack`](https://github.com/webpack/webpack/issues/7918) and use regex to remove
calls to `instantiateStreaming` in the
[build script](https://github.com/speice-io/isomorphic-rust/blob/master/percy/build.sh#L21-L25):
```sh
@ -132,12 +140,14 @@ cargo +nightly build --target=wasm32-unknown-unknown && \
"$DIR/node_modules/webpack-cli/bin/cli.js" --mode=production "$APP_DIR/app_loader.js" -o "$APP_DIR/bundle.js"
```
But we're not done yet! After we compile Rust into WASM and link WASM to Javascript (via `wasm-bindgen` and `webpack`),
we still have to make an Electron app. For this purpose I used a starter app from [Electron Forge],
and then a [`prestart` script](https://github.com/speice-io/isomorphic-rust/blob/master/percy/package.json#L8)
But we're not done yet! After we compile Rust into WASM and link WASM to Javascript (via
`wasm-bindgen` and `webpack`), we still have to make an Electron app. For this purpose I used a
starter app from [Electron Forge], and then a
[`prestart` script](https://github.com/speice-io/isomorphic-rust/blob/master/percy/package.json#L8)
to actually handle starting the application.
The [final toolchain](https://github.com/speice-io/isomorphic-rust/blob/master/percy/package.json#L8)
The
[final toolchain](https://github.com/speice-io/isomorphic-rust/blob/master/percy/package.json#L8)
looks something like this:
- `yarn start` triggers the `prestart` script
@ -145,23 +155,24 @@ looks something like this:
- Uses `cargo` to compile the Rust code into WASM
- Uses `wasm-bindgen` to link the WASM blob into a Javascript file with exported symbols
- Uses `webpack` to bundle the page start script with the Javascript we just generated
- Uses `babel` under the hood to compile the `wasm-bindgen` code down from ES6 into something browser-compatible
- Uses `babel` under the hood to compile the `wasm-bindgen` code down from ES6 into something
browser-compatible
- The `start` script runs an Electron Forge handler to do some sanity checks
- Electron actually starts
...which is complicated. I think more work needs to be done to either build a high-quality starter app that
can manage these steps, or another tool that "just handles" the complexity of linking a compiled WASM file into
something the Electron browser can run.
...which is complicated. I think more work needs to be done to either build a high-quality starter
app that can manage these steps, or another tool that "just handles" the complexity of linking a
compiled WASM file into something the Electron browser can run.
# Issue the Second: WASM tools in Rust
For as much as I didn't enjoy the Javascript tooling needed to interface with Rust, the Rust-only bits aren't
any better at the moment. I get it, a lot of projects are just starting off, and that leads to a fragmented
ecosystem. Here's what I can recommend as a starting point:
For as much as I didn't enjoy the Javascript tooling needed to interface with Rust, the Rust-only
bits aren't any better at the moment. I get it, a lot of projects are just starting off, and that
leads to a fragmented ecosystem. Here's what I can recommend as a starting point:
Don't check in your `Cargo.lock` files to version control. If there's a disagreement between the
version of `wasm-bindgen-cli` you have installed and the `wasm-bindgen` you're compiling with in `Cargo.lock`,
you get a nasty error:
version of `wasm-bindgen-cli` you have installed and the `wasm-bindgen` you're compiling with in
`Cargo.lock`, you get a nasty error:
```
it looks like the Rust project used to create this wasm file was linked against
@ -180,8 +191,9 @@ Not that I ever managed to run into this myself (_coughs nervously_).
There are two projects attempting to be "application frameworks": [percy] and [yew]. Between those,
I managed to get [two](https://github.com/speice-io/isomorphic-rust/tree/master/percy)
[examples](https://github.com/speice-io/isomorphic-rust/tree/master/percy_patched_webpack) running
using `percy`, but was unable to get an [example](https://github.com/speice-io/isomorphic-rust/tree/master/yew)
running with `yew` because of issues with "missing modules" during the `webpack` step:
using `percy`, but was unable to get an
[example](https://github.com/speice-io/isomorphic-rust/tree/master/yew) running with `yew` because
of issues with "missing modules" during the `webpack` step:
```sh
ERROR in ./dist/electron_yew_wasm_bg.wasm
@ -192,9 +204,10 @@ Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'env' in '/home/bspeice/Development/isomo
@ ./dist/app_loader.js
```
If you want to work with the browser APIs directly, your choices are [percy-webapis] or [stdweb] (or eventually [web-sys]).
See above for my `percy` examples, but when I tried [an example with `stdweb`](https://github.com/speice-io/isomorphic-rust/tree/master/stdweb),
I was unable to get it running:
If you want to work with the browser APIs directly, your choices are [percy-webapis] or [stdweb] (or
eventually [web-sys]). See above for my `percy` examples, but when I tried
[an example with `stdweb`](https://github.com/speice-io/isomorphic-rust/tree/master/stdweb), I was
unable to get it running:
```sh
ERROR in ./dist/stdweb_electron_bg.wasm
@ -204,28 +217,30 @@ Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'env' in '/home/bspeice/Development/isomo
@ ./dist/app_loader.js
```
At this point I'm pretty convinced that `stdweb` is causing issues for `yew` as well, but can't prove it.
At this point I'm pretty convinced that `stdweb` is causing issues for `yew` as well, but can't
prove it.
I did also get a [minimal example](https://github.com/speice-io/isomorphic-rust/tree/master/minimal) running
that doesn't depend on any tools besides `wasm-bindgen`. However, it requires manually writing "`extern C`"
blocks for everything you need from the browser. Es no bueno.
I did also get a [minimal example](https://github.com/speice-io/isomorphic-rust/tree/master/minimal)
running that doesn't depend on any tools besides `wasm-bindgen`. However, it requires manually
writing "`extern C`" blocks for everything you need from the browser. Es no bueno.
Finally, from a tools and platform view, there are two up-and-coming packages that should be mentioned:
[js-sys] and [web-sys]. Their purpose is to be fundamental building blocks that exposes the browser's APIs
to Rust. If you're interested in building an app framework from scratch, these should give you the most
flexibility. I didn't touch either in my research, though I expect them to be essential long-term.
Finally, from a tools and platform view, there are two up-and-coming packages that should be
mentioned: [js-sys] and [web-sys]. Their purpose is to be fundamental building blocks that exposes
the browser's APIs to Rust. If you're interested in building an app framework from scratch, these
should give you the most flexibility. I didn't touch either in my research, though I expect them to
be essential long-term.
So there's a lot in play from the Rust side of things, and it's just going to take some time to figure out
what works and what doesn't.
So there's a lot in play from the Rust side of things, and it's just going to take some time to
figure out what works and what doesn't.
# Issue the Third: Known Unknowns
Alright, so after I managed to get an application started, I stopped there. It was a good deal of effort
to chain together even a proof of concept, and at this point I'd rather learn [Typescript] than keep
trying to maintain an incredibly brittle pipeline. Blasphemy, I know...
Alright, so after I managed to get an application started, I stopped there. It was a good deal of
effort to chain together even a proof of concept, and at this point I'd rather learn [Typescript]
than keep trying to maintain an incredibly brittle pipeline. Blasphemy, I know...
The important point I want to make is that there's a lot unknown about how any of this holds up outside
proofs of concept. Things I didn't attempt:
The important point I want to make is that there's a lot unknown about how any of this holds up
outside proofs of concept. Things I didn't attempt:
- Testing
- Packaging
@ -234,23 +249,27 @@ proofs of concept. Things I didn't attempt:
# What it Would Take
Much as I don't like Javascript, the tools are too shaky for me to recommend mixing Electron and WASM
at the moment. There's a lot of innovation happening, so who knows? Someone might have an application
in production a couple months from now. But at the moment, I'm personally going to stay away.
Much as I don't like Javascript, the tools are too shaky for me to recommend mixing Electron and
WASM at the moment. There's a lot of innovation happening, so who knows? Someone might have an
application in production a couple months from now. But at the moment, I'm personally going to stay
away.
Let's finish with a wishlist then - here are the things that I think need to happen before Electron/WASM/Rust
can become a thing:
Let's finish with a wishlist then - here are the things that I think need to happen before
Electron/WASM/Rust can become a thing:
- Webpack still needs some updates. The necessary work is in progress, but hasn't landed yet ([#7983](https://github.com/webpack/webpack/pull/7983))
- Browser API libraries (`web-sys` and `stdweb`) need to make sure they can support running in Electron (see module error above)
- Webpack still needs some updates. The necessary work is in progress, but hasn't landed yet
([#7983](https://github.com/webpack/webpack/pull/7983))
- Browser API libraries (`web-sys` and `stdweb`) need to make sure they can support running in
Electron (see module error above)
- Projects need to stabilize. There's talk of `stdweb` being turned into a Rust API
[on top of web-sys](https://github.com/rustwasm/team/issues/226#issuecomment-418475778), and percy
[moving to web-sys](https://github.com/chinedufn/percy/issues/24), both of which are big changes
- `wasm-bindgen` is great, but still in the "move fast and break things" phase
- A good "boilerplate" app would dramatically simplify the start-up costs;
[electron-react-boilerplate](https://github.com/chentsulin/electron-react-boilerplate)
comes to mind as a good project to imitate
- More blog posts/contributors! I think Electron + Rust could be cool, but I have no idea what I'm doing
[electron-react-boilerplate](https://github.com/chentsulin/electron-react-boilerplate) comes to
mind as a good project to imitate
- More blog posts/contributors! I think Electron + Rust could be cool, but I have no idea what I'm
doing
[wxwidgets]: https://wxwidgets.org/
[libui-rs]: https://github.com/LeoTindall/libui-rs/

78
_posts/2018-10-08-case-study-optimization.md
View File

@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ tags: []
One of my earliest conversations about programming went like this:
> Programmers have it too easy these days. They should learn to develop
> in low memory environments and be more efficient.
> Programmers have it too easy these days. They should learn to develop in low memory environments
> and be more efficient.
>
> -- My Father (paraphrased)
@ -19,27 +19,30 @@ packing a whole 24KB of RAM. By the way, _what are you doing on my lawn?_
The principle remains though: be efficient with the resources you have, because
[what Intel giveth, Microsoft taketh away](http://exo-blog.blogspot.com/2007/09/what-intel-giveth-microsoft-taketh-away.html).
My professional work is focused on this kind of efficiency; low-latency financial markets demand that
you understand at a deep level _exactly_ what your code is doing. As I continue experimenting with Rust for
personal projects, it's exciting to bring a utilitarian mindset with me: there's flexibility for the times I pretend
to have a garbage collector, and flexibility for the times that I really care about how memory is used.
My professional work is focused on this kind of efficiency; low-latency financial markets demand
that you understand at a deep level _exactly_ what your code is doing. As I continue experimenting
with Rust for personal projects, it's exciting to bring a utilitarian mindset with me: there's
flexibility for the times I pretend to have a garbage collector, and flexibility for the times that
I really care about how memory is used.
This post is a (small) case study in how I went from the former to the latter. And ultimately, it's intended
to be a starting toolkit to empower analysis of your own code.
This post is a (small) case study in how I went from the former to the latter. And ultimately, it's
intended to be a starting toolkit to empower analysis of your own code.
# Curiosity
When I first started building the [dtparse] crate, my intention was to mirror as closely as possible
the equivalent [Python library][dateutil]. Python, as you may know, is garbage collected. Very rarely is memory
usage considered in Python, and I likewise wasn't paying too much attention when `dtparse` was first being built.
the equivalent [Python library][dateutil]. Python, as you may know, is garbage collected. Very
rarely is memory usage considered in Python, and I likewise wasn't paying too much attention when
`dtparse` was first being built.
This lackadaisical approach to memory works well enough, and I'm not planning on making `dtparse` hyper-efficient.
But every so often, I've wondered: "what exactly is going on in memory?" With the advent of Rust 1.28 and the
[Global Allocator trait](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/alloc/trait.GlobalAlloc.html), I had a really great idea:
_build a custom allocator that allows you to track your own allocations._ That way, you can do things like
writing tests for both correct results and correct memory usage. I gave it a [shot][qadapt], but learned
very quickly: **never write your own allocator**. It went from "fun weekend project" to
"I have literally no idea what my computer is doing" at breakneck speed.
This lackadaisical approach to memory works well enough, and I'm not planning on making `dtparse`
hyper-efficient. But every so often, I've wondered: "what exactly is going on in memory?" With the
advent of Rust 1.28 and the
[Global Allocator trait](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/alloc/trait.GlobalAlloc.html), I had a really
great idea: _build a custom allocator that allows you to track your own allocations._ That way, you
can do things like writing tests for both correct results and correct memory usage. I gave it a
[shot][qadapt], but learned very quickly: **never write your own allocator**. It went from "fun
weekend project" to "I have literally no idea what my computer is doing" at breakneck speed.
Instead, I'll highlight a separate path I took to make sense of my memory usage: [heaptrack].
@ -47,8 +50,8 @@ Instead, I'll highlight a separate path I took to make sense of my memory usage:
This is the hardest part of the post. Because Rust uses
[its own allocator](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/27400#issue-41256384) by default,
`heaptrack` is unable to properly record unmodified Rust code. To remedy this, we'll make use
of the `#[global_allocator]` attribute.
`heaptrack` is unable to properly record unmodified Rust code. To remedy this, we'll make use of the
`#[global_allocator]` attribute.
Specifically, in `lib.rs` or `main.rs`, add this:
@ -63,8 +66,8 @@ static GLOBAL: System = System;
# Running heaptrack
Assuming you've installed heaptrack <span style="font-size: .6em;">(Homebrew in Mac, package manager in Linux, ??? in Windows)</span>,
all that's left is to fire up your application:
Assuming you've installed heaptrack <span style="font-size: .6em;">(Homebrew in Mac, package manager
in Linux, ??? in Windows)</span>, all that's left is to fire up your application:
```
heaptrack my_application
@ -84,10 +87,10 @@ And even these pretty colors:
# Reading Flamegraphs
To make sense of our memory usage, we're going to focus on that last picture - it's called
a ["flamegraph"](http://www.brendangregg.com/flamegraphs.html). These charts are typically
used to show how much time your program spends executing each function, but they're used here
to show how much memory was allocated during those functions instead.
To make sense of our memory usage, we're going to focus on that last picture - it's called a
["flamegraph"](http://www.brendangregg.com/flamegraphs.html). These charts are typically used to
show how much time your program spends executing each function, but they're used here to show how
much memory was allocated during those functions instead.
For example, we can see that all executions happened during the `main` function:
@ -101,16 +104,16 @@ For example, we can see that all executions happened during the `main` function:
![allocations in parseinfo](/assets/images/2018-10-heaptrack/heaptrack-parseinfo-colorized.png)
Now I apologize that it's hard to see, but there's one area specifically that stuck out
as an issue: **what the heck is the `Default` thing doing?**
Now I apologize that it's hard to see, but there's one area specifically that stuck out as an issue:
**what the heck is the `Default` thing doing?**
![pretty colors](/assets/images/2018-10-heaptrack/heaptrack-flamegraph-default.png)
# Optimizing dtparse
See, I knew that there were some allocations during calls to `dtparse::parse`,
but I was totally wrong about where the bulk of allocations occurred in my program.
Let me post the code and see if you can spot the mistake:
See, I knew that there were some allocations during calls to `dtparse::parse`, but I was totally
wrong about where the bulk of allocations occurred in my program. Let me post the code and see if
you can spot the mistake:
```rust
/// Main entry point for using `dtparse`.
@ -129,9 +132,9 @@ pub fn parse(timestr: &str) -> ParseResult<(NaiveDateTime, Option<FixedOffset>)>
---
Because `Parser::parse` requires a mutable reference to itself, I have to create a new `Parser::default`
every time it receives a string. This is excessive! We'd rather have an immutable parser
that can be re-used, and avoid allocating memory in the first place.
Because `Parser::parse` requires a mutable reference to itself, I have to create a new
`Parser::default` every time it receives a string. This is excessive! We'd rather have an immutable
parser that can be re-used, and avoid allocating memory in the first place.
Armed with that information, I put some time in to
[make the parser immutable](https://github.com/bspeice/dtparse/commit/741afa34517d6bc1155713bbc5d66905fea13fad#diff-b4aea3e418ccdb71239b96952d9cddb6).
@ -139,7 +142,8 @@ Now that I can re-use the same parser over and over, the allocations disappear:
![allocations cleaned up](/assets/images/2018-10-heaptrack/heaptrack-flamegraph-after.png)
In total, we went from requiring 2 MB of memory in [version 1.0.2](https://crates.io/crates/dtparse/1.0.2):
In total, we went from requiring 2 MB of memory in
[version 1.0.2](https://crates.io/crates/dtparse/1.0.2):
![memory before](/assets/images/2018-10-heaptrack/heaptrack-closeup.png)
@ -154,9 +158,9 @@ already exist to help you understand what your program is doing.
**Use them.**
Given that [Moore's Law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%27s_law)
is [dead](https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601441/moores-law-is-dead-now-what/), we've all got to
do our part to take back what Microsoft stole.
Given that [Moore's Law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%27s_law) is
[dead](https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601441/moores-law-is-dead-now-what/), we've all got to do
our part to take back what Microsoft stole.
[dtparse]: https://crates.io/crates/dtparse
[dateutil]: https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil

30
_posts/2018-12-04-what-small-business-really-means.md
View File

@ -8,29 +8,27 @@ tags: []
I recently stumbled across a phenomenal small article entitled
[What Startups Really Mean By "Why Should We Hire You?"](https://angel.co/blog/what-startups-really-mean-by-why-should-we-hire-you).
Having been interviewed by smaller companies (though not exactly startups),
the questions and subtexts are the same. There's often a question behind
the question that you're actually trying to answer, and I wish I
spotted the nuance earlier in my career.
Having been interviewed by smaller companies (though not exactly startups), the questions and
subtexts are the same. There's often a question behind the question that you're actually trying to
answer, and I wish I spotted the nuance earlier in my career.
Let me also make note of one more question/euphemism I've come across:
# How do you feel about Production Support?
**Translation**: _We're a fairly small team, and when things break on an evening/weekend/Christmas Day,
can we call on you to be there?_
**Translation**: _We're a fairly small team, and when things break on an evening/weekend/Christmas
Day, can we call on you to be there?_
I've met decidedly few people in my life who truly enjoy the "ops" side of "devops".
They're incredibly good at taking an impossible problem, pre-existing knowledge of
arcane arts, and turning that into a functioning system at the end. And if they all
left for lunch, we probably wouldn't make it out the door before the zombie apocalypse.
I've met decidedly few people in my life who truly enjoy the "ops" side of "devops". They're
incredibly good at taking an impossible problem, pre-existing knowledge of arcane arts, and turning
that into a functioning system at the end. And if they all left for lunch, we probably wouldn't make
it out the door before the zombie apocalypse.
Larger organizations (in my experience, 500+ person organizations) have the luxury
of hiring people who either enjoy that, or play along nicely enough that our systems
keep working.
Larger organizations (in my experience, 500+ person organizations) have the luxury of hiring people
who either enjoy that, or play along nicely enough that our systems keep working.
Small teams have no such luck. If you're interviewing at a small company, especially as a
"data scientist" or other somesuch position, be aware that systems can and do spontaneously
combust at the most inopportune moments.
Small teams have no such luck. If you're interviewing at a small company, especially as a "data
scientist" or other somesuch position, be aware that systems can and do spontaneously combust at the
most inopportune moments.
**Terrible-but-popular answers include**: _It's a part of the job, and I'm happy to contribute._

83
_posts/2018-12-15-allocation-safety.md
View File

@ -6,12 +6,11 @@ category:
tags: []
---
I think it's part of the human condition to ignore perfectly good advice when it comes our way.
A bit over a month ago, I was dispensing sage wisdom for the ages:
I think it's part of the human condition to ignore perfectly good advice when it comes our way. A
bit over a month ago, I was dispensing sage wisdom for the ages:
> I had a really great idea: build a custom allocator that allows you to track
> your own allocations. I gave it a shot, but learned very quickly:
> **never write your own allocator.**
> I had a really great idea: build a custom allocator that allows you to track your own allocations.
> I gave it a shot, but learned very quickly: **never write your own allocator.**
>
> -- [me](/2018/10/case-study-optimization.html)
@ -25,23 +24,23 @@ And _that's_ the part I'm going to focus on.
# Why an Allocator?
So why, after complaining about allocators, would I still want to write one?
There are three reasons for that:
So why, after complaining about allocators, would I still want to write one? There are three reasons
for that:
1. Allocation/dropping is slow
2. It's difficult to know exactly when Rust will allocate or drop, especially when using
code that you did not write
2. It's difficult to know exactly when Rust will allocate or drop, especially when using code that
you did not write
3. I want automated tools to verify behavior, instead of inspecting by hand
When I say "slow," it's important to define the terms. If you're writing web applications,
you'll spend orders of magnitude more time waiting for the database than you will the allocator.
However, there's still plenty of code where micro- or nano-seconds matter; think
When I say "slow," it's important to define the terms. If you're writing web applications, you'll
spend orders of magnitude more time waiting for the database than you will the allocator. However,
there's still plenty of code where micro- or nano-seconds matter; think
[finance](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH1Tta7purM),
[real-time audio](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/9hg7yj/synthesizer_progress_update/e6c291f),
[self-driving cars](https://polysync.io/blog/session-types-for-hearty-codecs/), and
[networking](https://carllerche.github.io/bytes/bytes/index.html).
In these situations it's simply unacceptable for you to spend time doing things
that are not your program, and waiting on the allocator is not cool.
[networking](https://carllerche.github.io/bytes/bytes/index.html). In these situations it's simply
unacceptable for you to spend time doing things that are not your program, and waiting on the
allocator is not cool.
As I continue to learn Rust, it's difficult for me to predict where exactly allocations will happen.
So, I propose we play a quick trivia game: **Does this code invoke the allocator?**
@ -54,10 +53,9 @@ fn my_function() {
}
```
**No**: Rust [knows how big](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/mem/fn.size_of.html)
the `Vec` type is, and reserves a fixed amount of memory on the stack for the `v` vector.
However, if we wanted to reserve extra space (using `Vec::with_capacity`) the allocator
would get invoked.
**No**: Rust [knows how big](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/mem/fn.size_of.html) the `Vec` type is,
and reserves a fixed amount of memory on the stack for the `v` vector. However, if we wanted to
reserve extra space (using `Vec::with_capacity`) the allocator would get invoked.
## Example 2
@ -67,10 +65,10 @@ fn my_function() {
}
```
**Yes**: Because Boxes allow us to work with things that are of unknown size, it has to allocate
on the heap. While the `Box` is unnecessary in this snippet (release builds will optimize out
the allocation), reserving heap space more generally is needed to pass a dynamically sized type
to another function.
**Yes**: Because Boxes allow us to work with things that are of unknown size, it has to allocate on
the heap. While the `Box` is unnecessary in this snippet (release builds will optimize out the
allocation), reserving heap space more generally is needed to pass a dynamically sized type to
another function.
## Example 3
@ -80,20 +78,20 @@ fn my_function(v: Vec<u8>) {
}
```
**Maybe**: Depending on whether the Vector we were given has space available, we may or may not allocate.
Especially when dealing with code that you did not author, it's difficult to verify that things behave
as you expect them to.
**Maybe**: Depending on whether the Vector we were given has space available, we may or may not
allocate. Especially when dealing with code that you did not author, it's difficult to verify that
things behave as you expect them to.
# Blowing Things Up
So, how exactly does QADAPT solve these problems? **Whenever an allocation or drop occurs in code marked
allocation-safe, QADAPT triggers a thread panic.** We don't want to let the program continue as if
nothing strange happened, _we want things to explode_.
So, how exactly does QADAPT solve these problems? **Whenever an allocation or drop occurs in code
marked allocation-safe, QADAPT triggers a thread panic.** We don't want to let the program continue
as if nothing strange happened, _we want things to explode_.
However, you don't want code to panic in production because of circumstances you didn't predict.
Just like [`debug_assert!`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/macro.debug_assert.html),
**QADAPT will strip out its own code when building in release mode to guarantee no panics and
no performance impact.**
Just like [`debug_assert!`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/macro.debug_assert.html), **QADAPT will
strip out its own code when building in release mode to guarantee no panics and no performance
impact.**
Finally, there are three ways to have QADAPT check that your code will not invoke the allocator:
@ -180,8 +178,8 @@ fn main() {
## Caveats
It's important to point out that QADAPT code is synchronous, so please be careful
when mixing in asynchronous functions:
It's important to point out that QADAPT code is synchronous, so please be careful when mixing in
asynchronous functions:
```rust
use futures::future::Future;
@ -208,16 +206,13 @@ fn main() {
# Conclusion
While there's a lot more to writing high-performance code than managing your usage
of the allocator, it's critical that you do use the allocator correctly.
QADAPT will verify that your code is doing what you expect. It's usable even on
stable Rust from version 1.31 onward, which isn't the case for most allocators.
Version 1.0 was released today, and you can check it out over at
[crates.io](https://crates.io/crates/qadapt) or on
[github](https://github.com/bspeice/qadapt).
While there's a lot more to writing high-performance code than managing your usage of the allocator,
it's critical that you do use the allocator correctly. QADAPT will verify that your code is doing
what you expect. It's usable even on stable Rust from version 1.31 onward, which isn't the case for
most allocators. Version 1.0 was released today, and you can check it out over at
[crates.io](https://crates.io/crates/qadapt) or on [github](https://github.com/bspeice/qadapt).
I'm hoping to write more about high-performance Rust in the future, and I expect
that QADAPT will help guide that. If there are topics you're interested in,
let me know in the comments below!
I'm hoping to write more about high-performance Rust in the future, and I expect that QADAPT will
help guide that. If there are topics you're interested in, let me know in the comments below!
[qadapt]: https://crates.io/crates/qadapt

123
_posts/2019-02-04-understanding-allocations-in-rust.md
View File

@ -6,28 +6,27 @@ category:
tags: [rust, understanding-allocations]
---
There's an alchemy of distilling complex technical topics into articles and videos
that change the way programmers see the tools they interact with on a regular basis.
I knew what a linker was, but there's a staggering amount of complexity in between
[the OS and `main()`](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOfucXtyEsU).
Rust programmers use the [`Box`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/boxed/struct.Box.html)
type all the time, but there's a rich history of the Rust language itself wrapped up in
There's an alchemy of distilling complex technical topics into articles and videos that change the
way programmers see the tools they interact with on a regular basis. I knew what a linker was, but
there's a staggering amount of complexity in between
[the OS and `main()`](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOfucXtyEsU). Rust programmers use the
[`Box`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/boxed/struct.Box.html) type all the time, but there's a
rich history of the Rust language itself wrapped up in
[how special it is](https://manishearth.github.io/blog/2017/01/10/rust-tidbits-box-is-special/).
In a similar vein, this series attempts to look at code and understand how memory is used;
the complex choreography of operating system, compiler, and program that frees you
to focus on functionality far-flung from frivolous book-keeping. The Rust compiler relieves
a great deal of the cognitive burden associated with memory management, but we're going
to step into its world for a while.
In a similar vein, this series attempts to look at code and understand how memory is used; the
complex choreography of operating system, compiler, and program that frees you to focus on
functionality far-flung from frivolous book-keeping. The Rust compiler relieves a great deal of the
cognitive burden associated with memory management, but we're going to step into its world for a
while.
Let's learn a bit about memory in Rust.
# Table of Contents
This series is intended as both learning and reference material; we'll work through the
different memory types Rust uses, and explain the implications of each. Ultimately,
a summary will be provided as a cheat sheet for easy future reference. To that end,
a table of contents is in order:
This series is intended as both learning and reference material; we'll work through the different
memory types Rust uses, and explain the implications of each. Ultimately, a summary will be provided
as a cheat sheet for easy future reference. To that end, a table of contents is in order:
- Foreword
- [Global Memory Usage: The Whole World](/2019/02/the-whole-world.html)
@ -38,72 +37,76 @@ a table of contents is in order:
# Foreword
Rust's three defining features of [Performance, Reliability, and Productivity](https://www.rust-lang.org/)
are all driven to a great degree by the how the Rust compiler understands memory usage.
Unlike managed memory languages (Java, Python), Rust
Rust's three defining features of
[Performance, Reliability, and Productivity](https://www.rust-lang.org/) are all driven to a great
degree by the how the Rust compiler understands memory usage. Unlike managed memory languages (Java,
Python), Rust
[doesn't really](https://words.steveklabnik.com/borrow-checking-escape-analysis-and-the-generational-hypothesis)
garbage collect; instead, it uses an [ownership](https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch04-01-what-is-ownership.html)
system to reason about how long objects will last in your program. In some cases, if the life of an object
is fairly transient, Rust can make use of a very fast region called the "stack." When that's not possible,
Rust uses [dynamic (heap) memory](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_management#Dynamic_memory_allocation)
and the ownership system to ensure you can't accidentally corrupt memory. It's not as fast, but it is
important to have available.
garbage collect; instead, it uses an
[ownership](https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch04-01-what-is-ownership.html) system to reason about
how long objects will last in your program. In some cases, if the life of an object is fairly
transient, Rust can make use of a very fast region called the "stack." When that's not possible,
Rust uses
[dynamic (heap) memory](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_management#Dynamic_memory_allocation)
and the ownership system to ensure you can't accidentally corrupt memory. It's not as fast, but it
is important to have available.
That said, there are specific situations in Rust where you'd never need to worry about the stack/heap
distinction! If you:
That said, there are specific situations in Rust where you'd never need to worry about the
stack/heap distinction! If you:
1. Never use `unsafe`
2. Never use `#![feature(alloc)]` or the [`alloc` crate](https://doc.rust-lang.org/alloc/index.html)
...then it's not possible for you to use dynamic memory!
For some uses of Rust, typically embedded devices, these constraints are OK.
They have very limited memory, and the program binary size itself may significantly
affect what's available! There's no operating system able to manage
this ["virtual memory"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_memory) thing, but that's
not an issue because there's only one running application. The
[embedonomicon](https://docs.rust-embedded.org/embedonomicon/preface.html) is ever in mind,
and interacting with the "real world" through extra peripherals is accomplished by
reading and writing to [specific memory addresses](https://bob.cs.sonoma.edu/IntroCompOrg-RPi/sec-gpio-mem.html).
For some uses of Rust, typically embedded devices, these constraints are OK. They have very limited
memory, and the program binary size itself may significantly affect what's available! There's no
operating system able to manage this
["virtual memory"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_memory) thing, but that's not an issue
because there's only one running application. The
[embedonomicon](https://docs.rust-embedded.org/embedonomicon/preface.html) is ever in mind, and
interacting with the "real world" through extra peripherals is accomplished by reading and writing
to [specific memory addresses](https://bob.cs.sonoma.edu/IntroCompOrg-RPi/sec-gpio-mem.html).
Most Rust programs find these requirements overly burdensome though. C++ developers
would struggle without access to [`std::vector`](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector)
(except those hardcore no-STL people), and Rust developers would struggle without
Most Rust programs find these requirements overly burdensome though. C++ developers would struggle
without access to [`std::vector`](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector) (except those
hardcore no-STL people), and Rust developers would struggle without
[`std::vec`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/vec/struct.Vec.html). But with the constraints above,
`std::vec` is actually a part of the
[`alloc` crate](https://doc.rust-lang.org/alloc/vec/struct.Vec.html), and thus off-limits.
`Box`, `Rc`, etc., are also unusable for the same reason.
[`alloc` crate](https://doc.rust-lang.org/alloc/vec/struct.Vec.html), and thus off-limits. `Box`,
`Rc`, etc., are also unusable for the same reason.
Whether writing code for embedded devices or not, the important thing in both situations
is how much you know _before your application starts_ about what its memory usage will look like.
In embedded devices, there's a small, fixed amount of memory to use.
In a browser, you have no idea how large [google.com](https://www.google.com)'s home page is until you start
trying to download it. The compiler uses this knowledge (or lack thereof) to optimize
how memory is used; put simply, your code runs faster when the compiler can guarantee exactly
how much memory your program needs while it's running. This series is all about understanding
how the compiler reasons about your program, with an emphasis on the implications for performance.
Whether writing code for embedded devices or not, the important thing in both situations is how much
you know _before your application starts_ about what its memory usage will look like. In embedded
devices, there's a small, fixed amount of memory to use. In a browser, you have no idea how large
[google.com](https://www.google.com)'s home page is until you start trying to download it. The
compiler uses this knowledge (or lack thereof) to optimize how memory is used; put simply, your code
runs faster when the compiler can guarantee exactly how much memory your program needs while it's
running. This series is all about understanding how the compiler reasons about your program, with an
emphasis on the implications for performance.
Now let's address some conditions and caveats before going much further:
- We'll focus on "safe" Rust only; `unsafe` lets you use platform-specific allocation API's
([`malloc`](https://www.tutorialspoint.com/c_standard_library/c_function_malloc.htm)) that we'll ignore.
- We'll assume a "debug" build of Rust code (what you get with `cargo run` and `cargo test`)
and address (pun intended) release mode at the end (`cargo run --release` and `cargo test --release`).
([`malloc`](https://www.tutorialspoint.com/c_standard_library/c_function_malloc.htm)) that we'll
ignore.
- We'll assume a "debug" build of Rust code (what you get with `cargo run` and `cargo test`) and
address (pun intended) release mode at the end (`cargo run --release` and `cargo test --release`).
- All content will be run using Rust 1.32, as that's the highest currently supported in the
[Compiler Exporer](https://godbolt.org/). As such, we'll avoid upcoming innovations like
[compile-time evaluation of `static`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0911-const-fn.md)
that are available in nightly.
- Because of the nature of the content, being able to read assembly is helpful.
We'll keep it simple, but I [found](https://stackoverflow.com/a/4584131/1454178)
a [refresher](https://stackoverflow.com/a/26026278/1454178) on the `push` and `pop`
[instructions](http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~evans/cs216/guides/x86.html)
was helpful while writing this.
- I've tried to be precise in saying only what I can prove using the tools (ASM, docs)
that are available, but if there's something said in error it will be corrected
expeditiously. Please let me know at [bradlee@speice.io](mailto:bradlee@speice.io)
- Because of the nature of the content, being able to read assembly is helpful. We'll keep it
simple, but I [found](https://stackoverflow.com/a/4584131/1454178) a
[refresher](https://stackoverflow.com/a/26026278/1454178) on the `push` and `pop`
[instructions](http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~evans/cs216/guides/x86.html) was helpful while writing
this.
- I've tried to be precise in saying only what I can prove using the tools (ASM, docs) that are
available, but if there's something said in error it will be corrected expeditiously. Please let
me know at [bradlee@speice.io](mailto:bradlee@speice.io)
Finally, I'll do what I can to flag potential future changes but the Rust docs
have a notice worth repeating:
Finally, I'll do what I can to flag potential future changes but the Rust docs have a notice worth
repeating:
> Rust does not currently have a rigorously and formally defined memory model.
>

172
_posts/2019-02-05-the-whole-world.md
View File

@ -6,27 +6,26 @@ category:
tags: [rust, understanding-allocations]
---
The first memory type we'll look at is pretty special: when Rust can prove that
a _value_ is fixed for the life of a program (`const`), and when a _reference_ is unique for
the life of a program (`static` as a declaration, not
[`'static`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch10-03-lifetime-syntax.html#the-static-lifetime)
as a lifetime), we can make use of global memory. This special section of data is embedded
directly in the program binary so that variables are ready to go once the program loads;
no additional computation is necessary.
The first memory type we'll look at is pretty special: when Rust can prove that a _value_ is fixed
for the life of a program (`const`), and when a _reference_ is unique for the life of a program
(`static` as a declaration, not
[`'static`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch10-03-lifetime-syntax.html#the-static-lifetime) as a
lifetime), we can make use of global memory. This special section of data is embedded directly in
the program binary so that variables are ready to go once the program loads; no additional
computation is necessary.
Understanding the value/reference distinction is important for reasons we'll go into below,
and while the
[full specification](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0246-const-vs-static.md)
for these two keywords is available, we'll take a hands-on approach to the topic.
Understanding the value/reference distinction is important for reasons we'll go into below, and
while the
[full specification](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0246-const-vs-static.md) for
these two keywords is available, we'll take a hands-on approach to the topic.
# **const**
When a _value_ is guaranteed to be unchanging in your program (where "value" may be scalars,
`struct`s, etc.), you can declare it `const`.
This tells the compiler that it's safe to treat the value as never changing, and enables
some interesting optimizations; not only is there no initialization cost to
creating the value (it is loaded at the same time as the executable parts of your program),
but the compiler can also copy the value around if it speeds up the code.
`struct`s, etc.), you can declare it `const`. This tells the compiler that it's safe to treat the
value as never changing, and enables some interesting optimizations; not only is there no
initialization cost to creating the value (it is loaded at the same time as the executable parts of
your program), but the compiler can also copy the value around if it speeds up the code.
The points we need to address when talking about `const` are:
@ -38,12 +37,12 @@ The points we need to address when talking about `const` are:
The first point is a bit strange - "read-only memory."
[The Rust book](https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch03-01-variables-and-mutability.html#differences-between-variables-and-constants)
mentions in a couple places that using `mut` with constants is illegal,
but it's also important to demonstrate just how immutable they are. _Typically_ in Rust
you can use [interior mutability](https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch15-05-interior-mutability.html)
to modify things that aren't declared `mut`.
[`RefCell`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/cell/struct.RefCell.html) provides an
example of this pattern in action:
mentions in a couple places that using `mut` with constants is illegal, but it's also important to
demonstrate just how immutable they are. _Typically_ in Rust you can use
[interior mutability](https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch15-05-interior-mutability.html) to modify
things that aren't declared `mut`.
[`RefCell`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/cell/struct.RefCell.html) provides an example of this
pattern in action:
```rust
use std::cell::RefCell;
@ -64,7 +63,8 @@ fn main() {
}
```
-- [Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=8e4bea1a718edaff4507944e825a54b2)
--
[Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=8e4bea1a718edaff4507944e825a54b2)
When `const` is involved though, interior mutability is impossible:
@ -86,7 +86,8 @@ fn main() {
}
```
-- [Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=88fe98110c33c1b3a51e341f48b8ae00)
--
[Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=88fe98110c33c1b3a51e341f48b8ae00)
And a second example using [`Once`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/sync/struct.Once.html):
@ -105,18 +106,20 @@ fn main() {
}
```
-- [Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=c3cc5979b5e5434eca0f9ec4a06ee0ed)
--
[Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=c3cc5979b5e5434eca0f9ec4a06ee0ed)
When the [`const` specification](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/26197104b7bb9a5a35db243d639aee6e46d35d75/text/0246-const-vs-static.md)
refers to ["rvalues"](http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3055.pdf), this behavior
is what they refer to. [Clippy](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy) will treat this as an error,
but it's still something to be aware of.
When the
[`const` specification](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/26197104b7bb9a5a35db243d639aee6e46d35d75/text/0246-const-vs-static.md)
refers to ["rvalues"](http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3055.pdf), this
behavior is what they refer to. [Clippy](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy) will treat this
as an error, but it's still something to be aware of.
## Initialization == Compilation
The next thing to mention is that `const` values are loaded into memory _as part of your program binary_.
Because of this, any `const` values declared in your program will be "realized" at compile-time;
accessing them may trigger a main-memory lookup (with a fixed address, so your CPU may
The next thing to mention is that `const` values are loaded into memory _as part of your program
binary_. Because of this, any `const` values declared in your program will be "realized" at
compile-time; accessing them may trigger a main-memory lookup (with a fixed address, so your CPU may
be able to prefetch the value), but that's it.
```rust
@ -132,8 +135,8 @@ pub fn multiply(value: u32) -> u32 {
-- [Compiler Explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/Th8boO)
The compiler creates one `RefCell`, uses it everywhere, and never
needs to call the `RefCell::new` function.
The compiler creates one `RefCell`, uses it everywhere, and never needs to call the `RefCell::new`
function.
## Copying
@ -155,39 +158,38 @@ pub fn multiply_twice(value: u32) -> u32 {
-- [Compiler Explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/ZtS54X)
In this example, the `FACTOR` value is turned into the `mov edi, 1000` instruction
in both the `multiply` and `multiply_twice` functions; the "1000" value is never
"stored" anywhere, as it's small enough to inline into the assembly instructions.
In this example, the `FACTOR` value is turned into the `mov edi, 1000` instruction in both the
`multiply` and `multiply_twice` functions; the "1000" value is never "stored" anywhere, as it's
small enough to inline into the assembly instructions.
Finally, getting the address of a `const` value is possible, but not guaranteed
to be unique (because the compiler can choose to copy values). I was unable to
get non-unique pointers in my testing (even using different crates),
but the specifications are clear enough: _don't rely on pointers to `const`
values being consistent_. To be frank, caring about locations for `const` values
Finally, getting the address of a `const` value is possible, but not guaranteed to be unique
(because the compiler can choose to copy values). I was unable to get non-unique pointers in my
testing (even using different crates), but the specifications are clear enough: _don't rely on
pointers to `const` values being consistent_. To be frank, caring about locations for `const` values
is almost certainly a code smell.
# **static**
Static variables are related to `const` variables, but take a slightly different approach.
When we declare that a _reference_ is unique for the life of a program,
you have a `static` variable (unrelated to the `'static` lifetime). Because of the
reference/value distinction with `const`/`static`,
static variables behave much more like typical "global" variables.
Static variables are related to `const` variables, but take a slightly different approach. When we
declare that a _reference_ is unique for the life of a program, you have a `static` variable
(unrelated to the `'static` lifetime). Because of the reference/value distinction with
`const`/`static`, static variables behave much more like typical "global" variables.
But to understand `static`, here's what we'll look at:
- `static` variables are globally unique locations in memory.
- Like `const`, `static` variables are loaded at the same time as your program being read into memory.
- All `static` variables must implement the [`Sync`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/marker/trait.Sync.html)
marker trait.
- Like `const`, `static` variables are loaded at the same time as your program being read into
memory.
- All `static` variables must implement the
[`Sync`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/marker/trait.Sync.html) marker trait.
- Interior mutability is safe and acceptable when using `static` variables.
## Memory Uniqueness
The single biggest difference between `const` and `static` is the guarantees
provided about uniqueness. Where `const` variables may or may not be copied
in code, `static` variables are guarantee to be unique. If we take a previous
`const` example and change it to `static`, the difference should be clear:
The single biggest difference between `const` and `static` is the guarantees provided about
uniqueness. Where `const` variables may or may not be copied in code, `static` variables are
guarantee to be unique. If we take a previous `const` example and change it to `static`, the
difference should be clear:
```rust
static FACTOR: u32 = 1000;
@ -205,15 +207,14 @@ pub fn multiply_twice(value: u32) -> u32 {
-- [Compiler Explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/uxmiRQ)
Where [previously](#copying) there were plenty of
references to multiplying by 1000, the new assembly refers to `FACTOR`
as a named memory location instead. No initialization work needs to be done,
but the compiler can no longer prove the value never changes during execution.
Where [previously](#copying) there were plenty of references to multiplying by 1000, the new
assembly refers to `FACTOR` as a named memory location instead. No initialization work needs to be
done, but the compiler can no longer prove the value never changes during execution.
## Initialization == Compilation
Next, let's talk about initialization. The simplest case is initializing
static variables with either scalar or struct notation:
Next, let's talk about initialization. The simplest case is initializing static variables with
either scalar or struct notation:
```rust
#[derive(Debug)]
@ -234,7 +235,8 @@ fn main() {
}
```
-- [Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=b538dbc46076f12db047af4f4403ee6e)
--
[Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=b538dbc46076f12db047af4f4403ee6e)
Things can get a bit weirder when using `const fn` though. In most cases, it just works:
@ -257,13 +259,15 @@ fn main() {
}
```
-- [Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=8c796a6e7fc273c12115091b707b0255)
--
[Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=8c796a6e7fc273c12115091b707b0255)
However, there's a caveat: you're currently not allowed to use `const fn` to initialize
static variables of types that aren't marked `Sync`. For example,
[`RefCell::new()`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/cell/struct.RefCell.html#method.new)
is a `const fn`, but because [`RefCell` isn't `Sync`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/cell/struct.RefCell.html#impl-Sync),
you'll get an error at compile time:
However, there's a caveat: you're currently not allowed to use `const fn` to initialize static
variables of types that aren't marked `Sync`. For example,
[`RefCell::new()`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/cell/struct.RefCell.html#method.new) is a
`const fn`, but because
[`RefCell` isn't `Sync`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/cell/struct.RefCell.html#impl-Sync), you'll
get an error at compile time:
```rust
use std::cell::RefCell;
@ -272,22 +276,23 @@ use std::cell::RefCell;
static MY_LOCK: RefCell<u8> = RefCell::new(0);
```
-- [Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=c76ef86e473d07117a1700e21fd45560)
--
[Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=c76ef86e473d07117a1700e21fd45560)
It's likely that this will [change in the future](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0911-const-fn.md) though.
It's likely that this will
[change in the future](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0911-const-fn.md) though.
## **Sync**
Which leads well to the next point: static variable types must implement the
[`Sync` marker](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/marker/trait.Sync.html).
Because they're globally unique, it must be safe for you to access static variables
from any thread at any time. Most `struct` definitions automatically implement the
`Sync` trait because they contain only elements which themselves
implement `Sync` (read more in the [Nomicon](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nomicon/send-and-sync.html)).
This is why earlier examples could get away with initializing
statics, even though we never included an `impl Sync for MyStruct` in the code.
To demonstrate this property, Rust refuses to compile our earlier
example if we add a non-`Sync` element to the `struct` definition:
[`Sync` marker](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/marker/trait.Sync.html). Because they're globally
unique, it must be safe for you to access static variables from any thread at any time. Most
`struct` definitions automatically implement the `Sync` trait because they contain only elements
which themselves implement `Sync` (read more in the
[Nomicon](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nomicon/send-and-sync.html)). This is why earlier examples could
get away with initializing statics, even though we never included an `impl Sync for MyStruct` in the
code. To demonstrate this property, Rust refuses to compile our earlier example if we add a
non-`Sync` element to the `struct` definition:
```rust
use std::cell::RefCell;
@ -304,13 +309,13 @@ static MY_STRUCT: MyStruct = MyStruct {
};
```
-- [Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=40074d0248f056c296b662dbbff97cfc)
--
[Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=40074d0248f056c296b662dbbff97cfc)
## Interior Mutability
Finally, while `static mut` variables are allowed, mutating them is an `unsafe` operation.
If we want to stay in `safe` Rust, we can use interior mutability to accomplish
similar goals:
Finally, while `static mut` variables are allowed, mutating them is an `unsafe` operation. If we
want to stay in `safe` Rust, we can use interior mutability to accomplish similar goals:
```rust
use std::sync::Once;
@ -328,4 +333,5 @@ fn main() {
}
```
-- [Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=3ba003a981a7ed7400240caadd384d59)
--
[Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=3ba003a981a7ed7400240caadd384d59)

256
_posts/2019-02-06-stacking-up.md
View File

@ -6,58 +6,57 @@ category:
tags: [rust, understanding-allocations]
---
`const` and `static` are perfectly fine, but it's relatively rare that we know
at compile-time about either values or references that will be the same for the
duration of our program. Put another way, it's not often the case that either you
or your compiler knows how much memory your entire program will ever need.
`const` and `static` are perfectly fine, but it's relatively rare that we know at compile-time about
either values or references that will be the same for the duration of our program. Put another way,
it's not often the case that either you or your compiler knows how much memory your entire program
will ever need.
However, there are still some optimizations the compiler can do if it knows how much
memory individual functions will need. Specifically, the compiler can make use of
"stack" memory (as opposed to "heap" memory) which can be managed far faster in
both the short- and long-term. When requesting memory, the
[`push` instruction](http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~evans/cs216/guides/x86.html)
can typically complete in [1 or 2 cycles](https://agner.org/optimize/instruction_tables.ods)
(<1 nanosecond on modern CPUs). Contrast that to heap memory which requires an allocator
(specialized software to track what memory is in use) to reserve space.
When you're finished with stack memory, the `pop` instruction runs in
1-3 cycles, as opposed to an allocator needing to worry about memory fragmentation
and other issues with the heap. All sorts of incredibly sophisticated techniques have been used
to design allocators:
However, there are still some optimizations the compiler can do if it knows how much memory
individual functions will need. Specifically, the compiler can make use of "stack" memory (as
opposed to "heap" memory) which can be managed far faster in both the short- and long-term. When
requesting memory, the [`push` instruction](http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~evans/cs216/guides/x86.html)
can typically complete in [1 or 2 cycles](https://agner.org/optimize/instruction_tables.ods) (<1
nanosecond on modern CPUs). Contrast that to heap memory which requires an allocator (specialized
software to track what memory is in use) to reserve space. When you're finished with stack memory,
the `pop` instruction runs in 1-3 cycles, as opposed to an allocator needing to worry about memory
fragmentation and other issues with the heap. All sorts of incredibly sophisticated techniques have
been used to design allocators:
- [Garbage Collection](<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garbage_collection_(computer_science)>)
strategies like [Tracing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tracing_garbage_collection)
(used in [Java](https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/tech/g1-intro-jsp-135488.html))
and [Reference counting](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reference_counting)
(used in [Python](https://docs.python.org/3/extending/extending.html#reference-counts))
- Thread-local structures to prevent locking the allocator in [tcmalloc](https://jamesgolick.com/2013/5/19/how-tcmalloc-works.html)
strategies like [Tracing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tracing_garbage_collection) (used in
[Java](https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/tech/g1-intro-jsp-135488.html)) and
[Reference counting](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reference_counting) (used in
[Python](https://docs.python.org/3/extending/extending.html#reference-counts))
- Thread-local structures to prevent locking the allocator in
[tcmalloc](https://jamesgolick.com/2013/5/19/how-tcmalloc-works.html)
- Arena structures used in [jemalloc](http://jemalloc.net/), which
[until recently](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2019/01/17/Rust-1.32.0.html#jemalloc-is-removed-by-default)
was the primary allocator for Rust programs!
But no matter how fast your allocator is, the principle remains: the
fastest allocator is the one you never use. As such, we're not going to discuss how exactly the
[`push` and `pop` instructions work](http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~evans/cs216/guides/x86.html),
but we'll focus instead on the conditions that enable the Rust compiler to use
faster stack-based allocation for variables.
But no matter how fast your allocator is, the principle remains: the fastest allocator is the one
you never use. As such, we're not going to discuss how exactly the
[`push` and `pop` instructions work](http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~evans/cs216/guides/x86.html), but
we'll focus instead on the conditions that enable the Rust compiler to use faster stack-based
allocation for variables.
So, **how do we know when Rust will or will not use stack allocation for objects we create?**
Looking at other languages, it's often easy to delineate
between stack and heap. Managed memory languages (Python, Java,
[C#](https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/ericlippert/2010/09/30/the-truth-about-value-types/))
place everything on the heap. JIT compilers ([PyPy](https://www.pypy.org/),
[HotSpot](https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/tech/index-jsp-136373.html)) may
optimize some heap allocations away, but you should never assume it will happen.
C makes things clear with calls to special functions (like [malloc(3)](https://linux.die.net/man/3/malloc))
needed to access heap memory. Old C++ has the [`new`](https://stackoverflow.com/a/655086/1454178)
keyword, though modern C++/C++11 is more complicated with [RAII](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/raii).
Looking at other languages, it's often easy to delineate between stack and heap. Managed memory
languages (Python, Java,
[C#](https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/ericlippert/2010/09/30/the-truth-about-value-types/)) place
everything on the heap. JIT compilers ([PyPy](https://www.pypy.org/),
[HotSpot](https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/tech/index-jsp-136373.html)) may optimize
some heap allocations away, but you should never assume it will happen. C makes things clear with
calls to special functions (like [malloc(3)](https://linux.die.net/man/3/malloc)) needed to access
heap memory. Old C++ has the [`new`](https://stackoverflow.com/a/655086/1454178) keyword, though
modern C++/C++11 is more complicated with [RAII](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/raii).
For Rust, we can summarize as follows: **stack allocation will be used for everything
that doesn't involve "smart pointers" and collections**. We'll skip over a precise definition
of the term "smart pointer" for now, and instead discuss what we should watch for to understand
when stack and heap memory regions are used:
For Rust, we can summarize as follows: **stack allocation will be used for everything that doesn't
involve "smart pointers" and collections**. We'll skip over a precise definition of the term "smart
pointer" for now, and instead discuss what we should watch for to understand when stack and heap
memory regions are used:
1. Stack manipulation instructions (`push`, `pop`, and `add`/`sub` of the `rsp` register)
indicate allocation of stack memory:
1. Stack manipulation instructions (`push`, `pop`, and `add`/`sub` of the `rsp` register) indicate
allocation of stack memory:
```rust
pub fn stack_alloc(x: u32) -> u32 {
@ -71,9 +70,9 @@ when stack and heap memory regions are used:
-- [Compiler Explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/5WSgc9)
2. Tracking when exactly heap allocation calls occur is difficult. It's typically easier to
watch for `call core::ptr::real_drop_in_place`, and infer that a heap allocation happened
in the recent past:
2. Tracking when exactly heap allocation calls occur is difficult. It's typically easier to watch
for `call core::ptr::real_drop_in_place`, and infer that a heap allocation happened in the recent
past:
```rust
pub fn heap_alloc(x: usize) -> usize {
@ -86,33 +85,35 @@ when stack and heap memory regions are used:
```
-- [Compiler Explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/epfgoQ) (`real_drop_in_place` happens on line 1317)
<span style="font-size: .8em">Note: While the [`Drop` trait](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ops/trait.Drop.html)
is [called for stack-allocated objects](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=87edf374d8983816eb3d8cfeac657b46),
the Rust standard library only defines `Drop` implementations for types that involve heap allocation.</span>
<span style="font-size: .8em">Note: While the
[`Drop` trait](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ops/trait.Drop.html) is
[called for stack-allocated objects](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=87edf374d8983816eb3d8cfeac657b46),
the Rust standard library only defines `Drop` implementations for types that involve heap
allocation.</span>
3. If you don't want to inspect the assembly, use a custom allocator that's able to track
and alert when heap allocations occur. Crates like [`alloc_counter`](https://crates.io/crates/alloc_counter)
are designed for exactly this purpose.
3. If you don't want to inspect the assembly, use a custom allocator that's able to track and alert
when heap allocations occur. Crates like
[`alloc_counter`](https://crates.io/crates/alloc_counter) are designed for exactly this purpose.
With all that in mind, let's talk about situations in which we're guaranteed to use stack memory:
- Structs are created on the stack.
- Function arguments are passed on the stack, meaning the
[`#[inline]` attribute](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#inline-attribute)
will not change the memory region used.
[`#[inline]` attribute](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#inline-attribute) will
not change the memory region used.
- Enums and unions are stack-allocated.
- [Arrays](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.array.html) are always stack-allocated.
- Closures capture their arguments on the stack.
- Generics will use stack allocation, even with dynamic dispatch.
- [`Copy`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/marker/trait.Copy.html) types are guaranteed to be
stack-allocated, and copying them will be done in stack memory.
- [`Iterator`s](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/iter/trait.Iterator.html) in the standard library
are stack-allocated even when iterating over heap-based collections.
- [`Iterator`s](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/iter/trait.Iterator.html) in the standard library are
stack-allocated even when iterating over heap-based collections.
# Structs
The simplest case comes first. When creating vanilla `struct` objects, we use stack memory
to hold their contents:
The simplest case comes first. When creating vanilla `struct` objects, we use stack memory to hold
their contents:
```rust
struct Point {
@ -140,21 +141,19 @@ pub fn make_line() {
-- [Compiler Explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/vri9BE)
Note that while some extra-fancy instructions are used for memory manipulation in the assembly,
the `sub rsp, 64` instruction indicates we're still working with the stack.
Note that while some extra-fancy instructions are used for memory manipulation in the assembly, the
`sub rsp, 64` instruction indicates we're still working with the stack.
# Function arguments
Have you ever wondered how functions communicate with each other? Like, once the variables are
given to you, everything's fine. But how do you "give" those variables to another function?
How do you get the results back afterward? The answer: the compiler arranges memory and
assembly instructions using a pre-determined
[calling convention](http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#calling-conventions).
This convention governs the rules around where arguments needed by a function will be located
(either in memory offsets relative to the stack pointer `rsp`, or in other registers), and
where the results can be found once the function has finished. And when multiple languages
agree on what the calling conventions are, you can do things like having
[Go call Rust code](https://blog.filippo.io/rustgo/)!
Have you ever wondered how functions communicate with each other? Like, once the variables are given
to you, everything's fine. But how do you "give" those variables to another function? How do you get
the results back afterward? The answer: the compiler arranges memory and assembly instructions using
a pre-determined [calling convention](http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#calling-conventions). This
convention governs the rules around where arguments needed by a function will be located (either in
memory offsets relative to the stack pointer `rsp`, or in other registers), and where the results
can be found once the function has finished. And when multiple languages agree on what the calling
conventions are, you can do things like having [Go call Rust code](https://blog.filippo.io/rustgo/)!
Put simply: it's the compiler's job to figure out how to call other functions, and you can assume
that the compiler is good at its job.
@ -206,9 +205,9 @@ pub fn total_distance() {
-- [Compiler Explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/Qmx4ST)
As a consequence of function arguments never using heap memory, we can also
infer that functions using the `#[inline]` attributes also do not heap allocate.
But better than inferring, we can look at the assembly to prove it:
As a consequence of function arguments never using heap memory, we can also infer that functions
using the `#[inline]` attributes also do not heap allocate. But better than inferring, we can look
at the assembly to prove it:
```rust
struct Point {
@ -245,10 +244,9 @@ pub fn total_distance() {
-- [Compiler Explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/30Sh66)
Finally, passing by value (arguments with type
[`Copy`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/marker/trait.Copy.html))
and passing by reference (either moving ownership or passing a pointer) may have
slightly different layouts in assembly, but will still use either stack memory
or CPU registers:
[`Copy`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/marker/trait.Copy.html)) and passing by reference (either
moving ownership or passing a pointer) may have slightly different layouts in assembly, but will
still use either stack memory or CPU registers:
```rust
pub struct Point {
@ -289,9 +287,9 @@ pub fn distance_borrowed(a: &Point, b: &Point) -> i64 {
If you've ever worried that wrapping your types in
[`Option`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/core/option/enum.Option.html) or
[`Result`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/core/result/enum.Result.html) would
finally make them large enough that Rust decides to use heap allocation instead,
fear no longer: `enum` and union types don't use heap allocation:
[`Result`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/core/result/enum.Result.html) would finally make them
large enough that Rust decides to use heap allocation instead, fear no longer: `enum` and union
types don't use heap allocation:
```rust
enum MyEnum {
@ -316,18 +314,17 @@ pub fn enum_compare() {
-- [Compiler Explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/HK7zBx)
Because the size of an `enum` is the size of its largest element plus a flag,
the compiler can predict how much memory is used no matter which variant
of an enum is currently stored in a variable. Thus, enums and unions have no
need of heap allocation. There's unfortunately not a great way to show this
in assembly, so I'll instead point you to the
Because the size of an `enum` is the size of its largest element plus a flag, the compiler can
predict how much memory is used no matter which variant of an enum is currently stored in a
variable. Thus, enums and unions have no need of heap allocation. There's unfortunately not a great
way to show this in assembly, so I'll instead point you to the
[`core::mem::size_of`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/core/mem/fn.size_of.html#size-of-enums)
documentation.
# Arrays
The array type is guaranteed to be stack allocated, which is why the array size must
be declared. Interestingly enough, this can be used to cause safe Rust programs to crash:
The array type is guaranteed to be stack allocated, which is why the array size must be declared.
Interestingly enough, this can be used to cause safe Rust programs to crash:
```rust
// 256 bytes
@ -364,33 +361,32 @@ fn main() {
}
```
-- [Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=587a6380a4914bcbcef4192c90c01dc4)
--
[Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=587a6380a4914bcbcef4192c90c01dc4)
There aren't any security implications of this (no memory corruption occurs),
but it's good to note that the Rust compiler won't move arrays into heap memory
even if they can be reasonably expected to overflow the stack.
There aren't any security implications of this (no memory corruption occurs), but it's good to note
that the Rust compiler won't move arrays into heap memory even if they can be reasonably expected to
overflow the stack.
# Closures
Rules for how anonymous functions capture their arguments are typically language-specific.
In Java, [Lambda Expressions](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/javaOO/lambdaexpressions.html)
are actually objects created on the heap that capture local primitives by copying, and capture
local non-primitives as (`final`) references.
Rules for how anonymous functions capture their arguments are typically language-specific. In Java,
[Lambda Expressions](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/javaOO/lambdaexpressions.html) are
actually objects created on the heap that capture local primitives by copying, and capture local
non-primitives as (`final`) references.
[Python](https://docs.python.org/3.7/reference/expressions.html#lambda) and
[JavaScript](https://javascriptweblog.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/understanding-javascript-closures/)
both bind _everything_ by reference normally, but Python can also
[capture values](https://stackoverflow.com/a/235764/1454178) and JavaScript has
[Arrow functions](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Functions/Arrow_functions).
In Rust, arguments to closures are the same as arguments to other functions;
closures are simply functions that don't have a declared name. Some weird ordering
of the stack may be required to handle them, but it's the compiler's responsiblity
to figure that out.
In Rust, arguments to closures are the same as arguments to other functions; closures are simply
functions that don't have a declared name. Some weird ordering of the stack may be required to
handle them, but it's the compiler's responsiblity to figure that out.
Each example below has the same effect, but a different assembly implementation.
In the simplest case, we immediately run a closure returned by another function.
Because we don't store a reference to the closure, the stack memory needed to
store the captured values is contiguous:
Each example below has the same effect, but a different assembly implementation. In the simplest
case, we immediately run a closure returned by another function. Because we don't store a reference
to the closure, the stack memory needed to store the captured values is contiguous:
```rust
fn my_func() -> impl FnOnce() {
@ -409,10 +405,9 @@ pub fn immediate() {
-- [Compiler Explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/mgJ2zl), 25 total assembly instructions
If we store a reference to the closure, the Rust compiler keeps values it needs
in the stack memory of the original function. Getting the details right is a bit harder,
so the instruction count goes up even though this code is functionally equivalent
to our original example:
If we store a reference to the closure, the Rust compiler keeps values it needs in the stack memory
of the original function. Getting the details right is a bit harder, so the instruction count goes
up even though this code is functionally equivalent to our original example:
```rust
pub fn simple_reference() {
@ -442,10 +437,9 @@ In every circumstance though, the compiler ensured that no heap allocations were
# Generics
Traits in Rust come in two broad forms: static dispatch (monomorphization, `impl Trait`)
and dynamic dispatch (trait objects, `dyn Trait`). While dynamic dispatch is often
_associated_ with trait objects being stored in the heap, dynamic dispatch can be used
with stack allocated objects as well:
Traits in Rust come in two broad forms: static dispatch (monomorphization, `impl Trait`) and dynamic
dispatch (trait objects, `dyn Trait`). While dynamic dispatch is often _associated_ with trait
objects being stored in the heap, dynamic dispatch can be used with stack allocated objects as well:
```rust
trait GetInt {
@ -498,29 +492,28 @@ pub fn do_call() {
-- [Compiler Explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/u_yguS)
It's hard to imagine practical situations where dynamic dispatch would be
used for objects that aren't heap allocated, but it technically can be done.
It's hard to imagine practical situations where dynamic dispatch would be used for objects that
aren't heap allocated, but it technically can be done.
# Copy types
Understanding move semantics and copy semantics in Rust is weird at first. The Rust docs
[go into detail](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/core/marker/trait.Copy.html)
far better than can be addressed here, so I'll leave them to do the job.
From a memory perspective though, their guideline is reasonable:
[go into detail](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/core/marker/trait.Copy.html) far better than can
be addressed here, so I'll leave them to do the job. From a memory perspective though, their
guideline is reasonable:
[if your type can implemement `Copy`, it should](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/core/marker/trait.Copy.html#when-should-my-type-be-copy).
While there are potential speed tradeoffs to _benchmark_ when discussing `Copy`
(move semantics for stack objects vs. copying stack pointers vs. copying stack `struct`s),
_it's impossible for `Copy` to introduce a heap allocation_.
While there are potential speed tradeoffs to _benchmark_ when discussing `Copy` (move semantics for
stack objects vs. copying stack pointers vs. copying stack `struct`s), _it's impossible for `Copy`
to introduce a heap allocation_.
But why is this the case? Fundamentally, it's because the language controls
what `Copy` means -
But why is this the case? Fundamentally, it's because the language controls what `Copy` means -
["the behavior of `Copy` is not overloadable"](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/marker/trait.Copy.html#whats-the-difference-between-copy-and-clone)
because it's a marker trait. From there we'll note that a type
[can implement `Copy`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/marker/trait.Copy.html#when-can-my-type-be-copy)
if (and only if) its components implement `Copy`, and that
[no heap-allocated types implement `Copy`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/marker/trait.Copy.html#implementors).
Thus, assignments involving heap types are always move semantics, and new heap
allocations won't occur because of implicit operator behavior.
Thus, assignments involving heap types are always move semantics, and new heap allocations won't
occur because of implicit operator behavior.
```rust
#[derive(Clone)]
@ -539,8 +532,9 @@ struct NotCopyable {
# Iterators
In managed memory languages (like [Java](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSkpMdDe4g4&feature=youtu.be&t=357)),
there's a subtle difference between these two code samples:
In managed memory languages (like
[Java](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSkpMdDe4g4&feature=youtu.be&t=357)), there's a subtle
difference between these two code samples:
```java
public static int sum_for(List<Long> vals) {
@ -562,16 +556,16 @@ public static int sum_foreach(List<Long> vals) {
}
```
In the `sum_for` function, nothing terribly interesting happens. In `sum_foreach`,
an object of type [`Iterator`](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/java.base/java/util/Iterator.html)
In the `sum_for` function, nothing terribly interesting happens. In `sum_foreach`, an object of type
[`Iterator`](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/java.base/java/util/Iterator.html)
is allocated on the heap, and will eventually be garbage-collected. This isn't a great design;
iterators are often transient objects that you need during a function and can discard
once the function ends. Sounds exactly like the issue stack-allocated objects address, no?
iterators are often transient objects that you need during a function and can discard once the
function ends. Sounds exactly like the issue stack-allocated objects address, no?
In Rust, iterators are allocated on the stack. The objects to iterate over are almost
certainly in heap memory, but the iterator itself
([`Iter`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/slice/struct.Iter.html)) doesn't need to use the heap.
In each of the examples below we iterate over a collection, but never use heap allocation:
In Rust, iterators are allocated on the stack. The objects to iterate over are almost certainly in
heap memory, but the iterator itself
([`Iter`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/slice/struct.Iter.html)) doesn't need to use the heap. In
each of the examples below we iterate over a collection, but never use heap allocation:
```rust
use std::collections::HashMap;

151
_posts/2019-02-07-a-heaping-helping.md
View File

@ -6,25 +6,25 @@ category:
tags: [rust, understanding-allocations]
---
Managing dynamic memory is hard. Some languages assume users will do it themselves (C, C++),
and some languages go to extreme lengths to protect users from themselves (Java, Python). In Rust,
how the language uses dynamic memory (also referred to as the **heap**) is a system called _ownership_.
Managing dynamic memory is hard. Some languages assume users will do it themselves (C, C++), and
some languages go to extreme lengths to protect users from themselves (Java, Python). In Rust, how
the language uses dynamic memory (also referred to as the **heap**) is a system called _ownership_.
And as the docs mention, ownership
[is Rust's most unique feature](https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch04-00-understanding-ownership.html).
The heap is used in two situations; when the compiler is unable to predict either the _total size
of memory needed_, or _how long the memory is needed for_, it allocates space in the heap.
This happens pretty frequently; if you want to download the Google home page, you won't know
how large it is until your program runs. And when you're finished with Google, we deallocate
the memory so it can be used to store other webpages. If you're
interested in a slightly longer explanation of the heap, check out
The heap is used in two situations; when the compiler is unable to predict either the _total size of
memory needed_, or _how long the memory is needed for_, it allocates space in the heap. This happens
pretty frequently; if you want to download the Google home page, you won't know how large it is
until your program runs. And when you're finished with Google, we deallocate the memory so it can be
used to store other webpages. If you're interested in a slightly longer explanation of the heap,
check out
[The Stack and the Heap](https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch04-01-what-is-ownership.html#the-stack-and-the-heap)
in Rust's documentation.
We won't go into detail on how the heap is managed; the
[ownership documentation](https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch04-01-what-is-ownership.html)
does a phenomenal job explaining both the "why" and "how" of memory management. Instead,
we're going to focus on understanding "when" heap allocations occur in Rust.
[ownership documentation](https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch04-01-what-is-ownership.html) does a
phenomenal job explaining both the "why" and "how" of memory management. Instead, we're going to
focus on understanding "when" heap allocations occur in Rust.
To start off, take a guess for how many allocations happen in the program below:
@ -32,9 +32,8 @@ To start off, take a guess for how many allocations happen in the program below:
fn main() {}
```
It's obviously a trick question; while no heap allocations occur as a result of
that code, the setup needed to call `main` does allocate on the heap.
Here's a way to show it:
It's obviously a trick question; while no heap allocations occur as a result of that code, the setup
needed to call `main` does allocate on the heap. Here's a way to show it:
```rust
#![feature(integer_atomics)]
@ -65,61 +64,58 @@ fn main() {
}
```
-- [Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=fb5060025ba79fc0f906b65a4ef8eb8e)
--
[Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=fb5060025ba79fc0f906b65a4ef8eb8e)
As of the time of writing, there are five allocations that happen before `main`
is ever called.
As of the time of writing, there are five allocations that happen before `main` is ever called.
But when we want to understand more practically where heap allocation happens,
we'll follow this guide:
But when we want to understand more practically where heap allocation happens, we'll follow this
guide:
- Smart pointers hold their contents in the heap
- Collections are smart pointers for many objects at a time, and reallocate
when they need to grow
- Collections are smart pointers for many objects at a time, and reallocate when they need to grow
Finally, there are two "addendum" issues that are important to address when discussing
Rust and the heap:
Finally, there are two "addendum" issues that are important to address when discussing Rust and the
heap:
- Non-heap alternatives to many standard library types are available.
- Special allocators to track memory behavior should be used to benchmark code.
# Smart pointers
The first thing to note are the "smart pointer" types.
When you have data that must outlive the scope in which it is declared,
or your data is of unknown or dynamic size, you'll make use of these types.
The first thing to note are the "smart pointer" types. When you have data that must outlive the
scope in which it is declared, or your data is of unknown or dynamic size, you'll make use of these
types.
The term [smart pointer](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_pointer)
comes from C++, and while it's closely linked to a general design pattern of
["Resource Acquisition Is Initialization"](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/raii),
we'll use it here specifically to describe objects that are responsible for managing
ownership of data allocated on the heap. The smart pointers available in the `alloc`
crate should look mostly familiar:
The term [smart pointer](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_pointer) comes from C++, and while it's
closely linked to a general design pattern of
["Resource Acquisition Is Initialization"](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/raii), we'll
use it here specifically to describe objects that are responsible for managing ownership of data
allocated on the heap. The smart pointers available in the `alloc` crate should look mostly
familiar:
- [`Box`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/alloc/boxed/struct.Box.html)
- [`Rc`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/alloc/rc/struct.Rc.html)
- [`Arc`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/alloc/sync/struct.Arc.html)
- [`Cow`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/alloc/borrow/enum.Cow.html)
The [standard library](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/) also defines some smart pointers
to manage heap objects, though more than can be covered here. Some examples are:
The [standard library](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/) also defines some smart pointers to manage
heap objects, though more than can be covered here. Some examples are:
- [`RwLock`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/sync/struct.RwLock.html)
- [`Mutex`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/sync/struct.Mutex.html)
Finally, there is one ["gotcha"](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gotcha):
**cell types** (like [`RefCell`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/core/cell/struct.RefCell.html))
look and behave similarly, but **don't involve heap allocation**. The
[`core::cell` docs](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/core/cell/index.html)
have more information.
Finally, there is one ["gotcha"](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gotcha): **cell types**
(like [`RefCell`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/core/cell/struct.RefCell.html)) look and behave
similarly, but **don't involve heap allocation**. The
[`core::cell` docs](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/core/cell/index.html) have more information.
When a smart pointer is created, the data it is given is placed in heap memory and
the location of that data is recorded in the smart pointer. Once the smart pointer
has determined it's safe to deallocate that memory (when a `Box` has
[gone out of scope](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/boxed/index.html) or a
reference count [goes to zero](https://doc.rust-lang.org/alloc/rc/index.html)),
the heap space is reclaimed. We can prove these types use heap memory by
looking at code:
When a smart pointer is created, the data it is given is placed in heap memory and the location of
that data is recorded in the smart pointer. Once the smart pointer has determined it's safe to
deallocate that memory (when a `Box` has
[gone out of scope](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/boxed/index.html) or a reference count
[goes to zero](https://doc.rust-lang.org/alloc/rc/index.html)), the heap space is reclaimed. We can
prove these types use heap memory by looking at code:
```rust
use std::rc::Rc;
@ -151,20 +147,19 @@ pub fn my_cow() {
# Collections
Collection types use heap memory because their contents have dynamic size; they will request
more memory [when needed](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/vec/struct.Vec.html#method.reserve),
and can [release memory](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/vec/struct.Vec.html#method.shrink_to_fit)
when it's no longer necessary. This dynamic property forces Rust to heap allocate
everything they contain. In a way, **collections are smart pointers for many objects at a time**.
Common types that fall under this umbrella are
[`Vec`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/alloc/vec/struct.Vec.html),
Collection types use heap memory because their contents have dynamic size; they will request more
memory [when needed](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/vec/struct.Vec.html#method.reserve), and can
[release memory](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/vec/struct.Vec.html#method.shrink_to_fit) when it's
no longer necessary. This dynamic property forces Rust to heap allocate everything they contain. In
a way, **collections are smart pointers for many objects at a time**. Common types that fall under
this umbrella are [`Vec`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/alloc/vec/struct.Vec.html),
[`HashMap`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/collections/struct.HashMap.html), and
[`String`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/alloc/string/struct.String.html)
(not [`str`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.str.html)).
[`String`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/alloc/string/struct.String.html) (not
[`str`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.str.html)).
While collections store the objects they own in heap memory, _creating new collections
will not allocate on the heap_. This is a bit weird; if we call `Vec::new()`, the
assembly shows a corresponding call to `real_drop_in_place`:
While collections store the objects they own in heap memory, _creating new collections will not
allocate on the heap_. This is a bit weird; if we call `Vec::new()`, the assembly shows a
corresponding call to `real_drop_in_place`:
```rust
pub fn my_vec() {
@ -175,8 +170,7 @@ pub fn my_vec() {
-- [Compiler Explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/1WkNtC)
But because the vector has no elements to manage, no calls to the allocator
will ever be dispatched:
But because the vector has no elements to manage, no calls to the allocator will ever be dispatched:
```rust
use std::alloc::{GlobalAlloc, Layout, System};
@ -217,7 +211,8 @@ unsafe impl GlobalAlloc for PanicAllocator {
}
```
-- [Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=831a297d176d015b1f9ace01ae416cc6)
--
[Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=831a297d176d015b1f9ace01ae416cc6)
Other standard library types follow the same behavior; make sure to check out
[`HashMap::new()`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/collections/hash_map/struct.HashMap.html#method.new),
@ -225,35 +220,35 @@ and [`String::new()`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/string/struct.String.html#me
# Heap Alternatives
While it is a bit strange to speak of the stack after spending time with the heap,
it's worth pointing out that some heap-allocated objects in Rust have stack-based counterparts
provided by other crates. If you have need of the functionality, but want to avoid allocating,
there are typically alternatives available.
While it is a bit strange to speak of the stack after spending time with the heap, it's worth
pointing out that some heap-allocated objects in Rust have stack-based counterparts provided by
other crates. If you have need of the functionality, but want to avoid allocating, there are
typically alternatives available.
When it comes to some standard library smart pointers
([`RwLock`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/sync/struct.RwLock.html) and
[`Mutex`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/sync/struct.Mutex.html)), stack-based alternatives
are provided in crates like [parking_lot](https://crates.io/crates/parking_lot) and
[`Mutex`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/sync/struct.Mutex.html)), stack-based alternatives are
provided in crates like [parking_lot](https://crates.io/crates/parking_lot) and
[spin](https://crates.io/crates/spin). You can check out
[`lock_api::RwLock`](https://docs.rs/lock_api/0.1.5/lock_api/struct.RwLock.html),
[`lock_api::Mutex`](https://docs.rs/lock_api/0.1.5/lock_api/struct.Mutex.html), and
[`spin::Once`](https://mvdnes.github.io/rust-docs/spin-rs/spin/struct.Once.html)
if you're in need of synchronization primitives.
[`spin::Once`](https://mvdnes.github.io/rust-docs/spin-rs/spin/struct.Once.html) if you're in need
of synchronization primitives.
[thread_id](https://crates.io/crates/thread-id) may be necessary if you're implementing an allocator
because [`thread::current().id()`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/thread/struct.ThreadId.html)
uses a [`thread_local!` structure](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/src/std/sys_common/thread_info.rs.html#17-36)
because [`thread::current().id()`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/thread/struct.ThreadId.html) uses a
[`thread_local!` structure](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/src/std/sys_common/thread_info.rs.html#17-36)
that needs heap allocation.
# Tracing Allocators
When writing performance-sensitive code, there's no alternative to measuring your code.
If you didn't write a benchmark,
When writing performance-sensitive code, there's no alternative to measuring your code. If you
didn't write a benchmark,
[you don't care about it's performance](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EWejmkKlxs&feature=youtu.be&t=263)
You should never rely on your instincts when
[a microsecond is an eternity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH1Tta7purM).
Similarly, there's great work going on in Rust with allocators that keep track of what
they're doing (like [`alloc_counter`](https://crates.io/crates/alloc_counter)).
When it comes to tracking heap behavior, it's easy to make mistakes;
please write tests and make sure you have tools to guard against future issues.
Similarly, there's great work going on in Rust with allocators that keep track of what they're doing
(like [`alloc_counter`](https://crates.io/crates/alloc_counter)). When it comes to tracking heap
behavior, it's easy to make mistakes; please write tests and make sure you have tools to guard
against future issues.

91
_posts/2019-02-08-compiler-optimizations.md
View File

@ -6,49 +6,44 @@ category:
tags: [rust, understanding-allocations]
---
**Update 2019-02-10**: When debugging a [related issue](https://gitlab.com/sio4/code/alloc-counter/issues/1),
it was discovered that the original code worked because LLVM optimized out
the entire function, rather than just the allocation segments.
The code has been updated with proper use of [`read_volatile`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ptr/fn.read_volatile.html),
and a previous section on vector capacity has been removed.
**Update 2019-02-10**: When debugging a
[related issue](https://gitlab.com/sio4/code/alloc-counter/issues/1), it was discovered that the
original code worked because LLVM optimized out the entire function, rather than just the allocation
segments. The code has been updated with proper use of
[`read_volatile`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ptr/fn.read_volatile.html), and a previous section
on vector capacity has been removed.
---
Up to this point, we've been discussing memory usage in the Rust language
by focusing on simple rules that are mostly right for small chunks of code.
We've spent time showing how those rules work themselves out in practice,
and become familiar with reading the assembly code needed to see each memory
type (global, stack, heap) in action.
Up to this point, we've been discussing memory usage in the Rust language by focusing on simple
rules that are mostly right for small chunks of code. We've spent time showing how those rules work
themselves out in practice, and become familiar with reading the assembly code needed to see each
memory type (global, stack, heap) in action.
Throughout the series so far, we've put a handicap on the code.
In the name of consistent and understandable results, we've asked the
compiler to pretty please leave the training wheels on. Now is the time
where we throw out all the rules and take off the kid gloves. As it turns out,
both the Rust compiler and the LLVM optimizers are incredibly sophisticated,
and we'll step back and let them do their job.
Throughout the series so far, we've put a handicap on the code. In the name of consistent and
understandable results, we've asked the compiler to pretty please leave the training wheels on. Now
is the time where we throw out all the rules and take off the kid gloves. As it turns out, both the
Rust compiler and the LLVM optimizers are incredibly sophisticated, and we'll step back and let them
do their job.
Similar to ["What Has My Compiler Done For Me Lately?"](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSkpMdDe4g4),
we're focusing on interesting things the Rust language (and LLVM!) can do
with memory management. We'll still be looking at assembly code to
understand what's going on, but it's important to mention again:
**please use automated tools like
[alloc-counter](https://crates.io/crates/alloc_counter) to double-check
memory behavior if it's something you care about**.
It's far too easy to mis-read assembly in large code sections, you should
always verify behavior if you care about memory usage.
Similar to
["What Has My Compiler Done For Me Lately?"](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSkpMdDe4g4), we're
focusing on interesting things the Rust language (and LLVM!) can do with memory management. We'll
still be looking at assembly code to understand what's going on, but it's important to mention
again: **please use automated tools like [alloc-counter](https://crates.io/crates/alloc_counter) to
double-check memory behavior if it's something you care about**. It's far too easy to mis-read
assembly in large code sections, you should always verify behavior if you care about memory usage.
The guiding principal as we move forward is this: _optimizing compilers
won't produce worse programs than we started with._ There won't be any
situations where stack allocations get moved to heap allocations.
There will, however, be an opera of optimization.
The guiding principal as we move forward is this: _optimizing compilers won't produce worse programs
than we started with._ There won't be any situations where stack allocations get moved to heap
allocations. There will, however, be an opera of optimization.
# The Case of the Disappearing Box
Our first optimization comes when LLVM can reason that the lifetime of an object
is sufficiently short that heap allocations aren't necessary. In these cases,
LLVM will move the allocation to the stack instead! The way this interacts
with `#[inline]` attributes is a bit opaque, but the important part is that LLVM
can sometimes do better than the baseline Rust language:
Our first optimization comes when LLVM can reason that the lifetime of an object is sufficiently
short that heap allocations aren't necessary. In these cases, LLVM will move the allocation to the
stack instead! The way this interacts with `#[inline]` attributes is a bit opaque, but the important
part is that LLVM can sometimes do better than the baseline Rust language:
```rust
use std::alloc::{GlobalAlloc, Layout, System};
@ -102,22 +97,21 @@ unsafe impl GlobalAlloc for PanicAllocator {
}
```
-- [Compiler Explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/BZ_Yp3)
-- [Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=release&edition=2018&gist=4a765f753183d5b919f62c71d2109d5d)
## -- [Compiler Explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/BZ_Yp3)
[Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=release&edition=2018&gist=4a765f753183d5b919f62c71d2109d5d)
# Dr. Array or: How I Learned to Love the Optimizer
Finally, this isn't so much about LLVM figuring out different memory behavior,
but LLVM stripping out code that doesn't do anything. Optimizations of
this type have a lot of nuance to them; if you're not careful, they can
make your benchmarks look
[impossibly good](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXaxk27zwlk&feature=youtu.be&t=1199).
In Rust, the `black_box` function (implemented in both
Finally, this isn't so much about LLVM figuring out different memory behavior, but LLVM stripping
out code that doesn't do anything. Optimizations of this type have a lot of nuance to them; if
you're not careful, they can make your benchmarks look
[impossibly good](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXaxk27zwlk&feature=youtu.be&t=1199). In Rust, the
`black_box` function (implemented in both
[`libtest`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.1.0/test/fn.black_box.html) and
[`criterion`](https://docs.rs/criterion/0.2.10/criterion/fn.black_box.html))
will tell the compiler to disable this kind of optimization. But if you let
LLVM remove unnecessary code, you can end up running programs that
previously caused errors:
[`criterion`](https://docs.rs/criterion/0.2.10/criterion/fn.black_box.html)) will tell the compiler
to disable this kind of optimization. But if you let LLVM remove unnecessary code, you can end up
running programs that previously caused errors:
```rust
#[derive(Default)]
@ -149,5 +143,6 @@ pub fn main() {
}
```
-- [Compiler Explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/daHn7P)
-- [Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=release&edition=2018&gist=4c253bf26072119896ab93c6ef064dc0)
## -- [Compiler Explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/daHn7P)
[Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=release&edition=2018&gist=4c253bf26072119896ab93c6ef064dc0)

17
_posts/2019-02-09-summary.md
View File

@ -6,18 +6,17 @@ category:
tags: [rust, understanding-allocations]
---
While there's a lot of interesting detail captured in this series, it's often helpful
to have a document that answers some "yes/no" questions. You may not care about
what an `Iterator` looks like in assembly, you just need to know whether it allocates
an object on the heap or not. And while Rust will prioritize the fastest behavior it can,
here are the rules for each memory type:
While there's a lot of interesting detail captured in this series, it's often helpful to have a
document that answers some "yes/no" questions. You may not care about what an `Iterator` looks like
in assembly, you just need to know whether it allocates an object on the heap or not. And while Rust
will prioritize the fastest behavior it can, here are the rules for each memory type:
**Heap Allocation**:
- Smart pointers (`Box`, `Rc`, `Mutex`, etc.) allocate their contents in heap memory.
- Collections (`HashMap`, `Vec`, `String`, etc.) allocate their contents in heap memory.
- Some smart pointers in the standard library have counterparts in other crates that
don't need heap memory. If possible, use those.
- Some smart pointers in the standard library have counterparts in other crates that don't need heap
memory. If possible, use those.
**Stack Allocation**:
@ -32,5 +31,5 @@ here are the rules for each memory type:
- `const` is a fixed value; the compiler is allowed to copy it wherever useful.
- `static` is a fixed reference; the compiler will guarantee it is unique.
![Container Sizes in Rust](/assets/images/2019-02-04-container-size.svg)
-- [Raph Levien](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1q-c7UAyrUlM-eZyTo1pd8SZ0qwA_wYxmPZVOQkoDmH4/edit?usp=sharing)
![Container Sizes in Rust](/assets/images/2019-02-04-container-size.svg) --
[Raph Levien](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1q-c7UAyrUlM-eZyTo1pd8SZ0qwA_wYxmPZVOQkoDmH4/edit?usp=sharing)

25
_posts/2019-05-03-making-bread.md
View File

@ -6,15 +6,22 @@ category:
tags: [baking]
---
Having recently started my "gardening leave" between positions, I have some more personal time available. I'm planning to stay productive, contributing to some open-source projects, but it also occurred to me that despite [talking about](https://speice.io/2018/05/hello.html) bread pics, this blog has been purely technical. Maybe I'll change the site title from "The Old Speice Guy" to "Bites and Bytes"?
Having recently started my "gardening leave" between positions, I have some more personal time
available. I'm planning to stay productive, contributing to some open-source projects, but it also
occurred to me that despite [talking about](https://speice.io/2018/05/hello.html) bread pics, this
blog has been purely technical. Maybe I'll change the site title from "The Old Speice Guy" to "Bites
and Bytes"?
Either way, I'm baking a little bit again, and figured it was worth taking a quick break to focus on some lighter material. I recently learned two critically important lessons: first, the temperature of the dough when you put the yeast in makes a huge difference.
Either way, I'm baking a little bit again, and figured it was worth taking a quick break to focus on
some lighter material. I recently learned two critically important lessons: first, the temperature
of the dough when you put the yeast in makes a huge difference.
Previously, when I wasn't paying attention to dough temperature:
![Whole weat dough](/assets/images/2019-05-03-making-bread/whole-wheat-not-rising.jpg)
Compared with what happens when I put the dough in the microwave for a defrost cycle because the water I used wasn't warm enough:
Compared with what happens when I put the dough in the microwave for a defrost cycle because the
water I used wasn't warm enough:
![White dough](/assets/images/2019-05-03-making-bread/white-dough-rising-before-fold.jpg)
@ -26,14 +33,20 @@ After shaping the dough, I've got two loaves ready:
![Shaped loaves](/assets/images/2019-05-03-making-bread/shaped-loaves.jpg)
Now, the recipe normally calls for a Dutch Oven to bake the bread because it keeps the dough from drying out in the oven. Because I don't own a Dutch Oven, I typically put a casserole dish on the bottom rack and fill it with water so there's still some moisture in the oven. This time, I forgot to add the water and learned my second lesson: never add room-temperature water to a glass dish that's currently at 500 degrees.
Now, the recipe normally calls for a Dutch Oven to bake the bread because it keeps the dough from
drying out in the oven. Because I don't own a Dutch Oven, I typically put a casserole dish on the
bottom rack and fill it with water so there's still some moisture in the oven. This time, I forgot
to add the water and learned my second lesson: never add room-temperature water to a glass dish
that's currently at 500 degrees.
![Shattered glass dish](/assets/images/2019-05-03-making-bread/shattered-glass.jpg)
Needless to say, trying to pull out sharp glass from an incredibly hot oven is not what I expected to be doing during my garden leave.
Needless to say, trying to pull out sharp glass from an incredibly hot oven is not what I expected
to be doing during my garden leave.
In the end, the bread crust wasn't great, but the bread itself turned out pretty alright:
![Baked bread](/assets/images/2019-05-03-making-bread/final-product.jpg)
I've been writing a lot more during this break, so I'm looking forward to sharing that in the future. In the mean-time, I'm planning on making a sandwich.
I've been writing a lot more during this break, so I'm looking forward to sharing that in the
future. In the mean-time, I'm planning on making a sandwich.

273
_posts/2019-06-31-high-performance-systems.md
View File

@ -8,92 +8,289 @@ tags: []
**Update 2019-09-21**: Added notes on `isolcpus` and `systemd` affinity.
Prior to working in the trading industry, my assumption was that High Frequency Trading (HFT) is made up of people who have access to secret techniques mortal developers could only dream of. There had to be some secret art that could only be learned if one had an appropriately tragic backstory:
Prior to working in the trading industry, my assumption was that High Frequency Trading (HFT) is
made up of people who have access to secret techniques mortal developers could only dream of. There
had to be some secret art that could only be learned if one had an appropriately tragic backstory:
<img src="/assets/images/2019-04-24-kung-fu.webp" alt="kung-fu fight">
> How I assumed HFT people learn their secret techniques
How else do you explain people working on systems that complete the round trip of market data in to orders out (a.k.a. tick-to-trade) consistently within [750-800 nanoseconds](https://stackoverflow.com/a/22082528/1454178)?
In roughly the time it takes a computer to access [main memory 8 times](https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~rcs/research/interactive_latency.html), trading systems are capable of reading the market data packets, deciding what orders to send, doing risk checks, creating new packets for exchange-specific protocols, and putting those packets on the wire.
How else do you explain people working on systems that complete the round trip of market data in to
orders out (a.k.a. tick-to-trade) consistently within
[750-800 nanoseconds](https://stackoverflow.com/a/22082528/1454178)? In roughly the time it takes a
computer to access
[main memory 8 times](https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~rcs/research/interactive_latency.html),
trading systems are capable of reading the market data packets, deciding what orders to send, doing
risk checks, creating new packets for exchange-specific protocols, and putting those packets on the
wire.
Having now worked in the trading industry, I can confirm the developers aren't super-human; I've made some simple mistakes at the very least. Instead, what shows up in public discussions is that philosophy, not technique, separates high-performance systems from everything else. Performance-critical systems don't rely on "this one cool C++ optimization trick" to make code fast (though micro-optimizations have their place); there's a lot more to worry about than just the code written for the project.
Having now worked in the trading industry, I can confirm the developers aren't super-human; I've
made some simple mistakes at the very least. Instead, what shows up in public discussions is that
philosophy, not technique, separates high-performance systems from everything else.
Performance-critical systems don't rely on "this one cool C++ optimization trick" to make code fast
(though micro-optimizations have their place); there's a lot more to worry about than just the code
written for the project.
The framework I'd propose is this: **If you want to build high-performance systems, focus first on reducing performance variance** (reducing the gap between the fastest and slowest runs of the same code), **and only look at average latency once variance is at an acceptable level**.
The framework I'd propose is this: **If you want to build high-performance systems, focus first on
reducing performance variance** (reducing the gap between the fastest and slowest runs of the same
code), **and only look at average latency once variance is at an acceptable level**.
Don't get me wrong, I'm a much happier person when things are fast. Computer goes from booting in 20 seconds down to 10 because I installed a solid-state drive? Awesome. But if every fifth day it takes a full minute to boot because of corrupted sectors? Not so great. Average speed over the course of a week is the same in each situation, but you're painfully aware of that minute when it happens. When it comes to code, the principal is the same: speeding up a function by an average of 10 milliseconds doesn't mean much if there's a 100ms difference between your fastest and slowest runs. When performance matters, you need to respond quickly _every time_, not just in aggregate. High-performance systems should first optimize for time variance. Once you're consistent at the time scale you care about, then focus on improving average time.
Don't get me wrong, I'm a much happier person when things are fast. Computer goes from booting in 20
seconds down to 10 because I installed a solid-state drive? Awesome. But if every fifth day it takes
a full minute to boot because of corrupted sectors? Not so great. Average speed over the course of a
week is the same in each situation, but you're painfully aware of that minute when it happens. When
it comes to code, the principal is the same: speeding up a function by an average of 10 milliseconds
doesn't mean much if there's a 100ms difference between your fastest and slowest runs. When
performance matters, you need to respond quickly _every time_, not just in aggregate.
High-performance systems should first optimize for time variance. Once you're consistent at the time
scale you care about, then focus on improving average time.
This focus on variance shows up all the time in industry too (emphasis added in all quotes below):
- In [marketing materials](https://business.nasdaq.com/market-tech/marketplaces/trading) for NASDAQ's matching engine, the most performance-sensitive component of the exchange, dependability is highlighted in addition to instantaneous metrics:
- In [marketing materials](https://business.nasdaq.com/market-tech/marketplaces/trading) for
NASDAQ's matching engine, the most performance-sensitive component of the exchange, dependability
is highlighted in addition to instantaneous metrics:
> Able to **consistently sustain** an order rate of over 100,000 orders per second at sub-40 microsecond average latency
> Able to **consistently sustain** an order rate of over 100,000 orders per second at sub-40
> microsecond average latency
- The [Aeron](https://github.com/real-logic/aeron) message bus has this to say about performance:
> Performance is the key focus. Aeron is designed to be the highest throughput with the lowest and **most predictable latency possible** of any messaging system
> Performance is the key focus. Aeron is designed to be the highest throughput with the lowest and
> **most predictable latency possible** of any messaging system
- The company PolySync, which is working on autonomous vehicles, [mentions why](https://polysync.io/blog/session-types-for-hearty-codecs/) they picked their specific messaging format:
- The company PolySync, which is working on autonomous vehicles,
[mentions why](https://polysync.io/blog/session-types-for-hearty-codecs/) they picked their
specific messaging format:
> In general, high performance is almost always desirable for serialization. But in the world of autonomous vehicles, **steady timing performance is even more important** than peak throughput. This is because safe operation is sensitive to timing outliers. Nobody wants the system that decides when to slam on the brakes to occasionally take 100 times longer than usual to encode its commands.
> In general, high performance is almost always desirable for serialization. But in the world of
> autonomous vehicles, **steady timing performance is even more important** than peak throughput.
> This is because safe operation is sensitive to timing outliers. Nobody wants the system that
> decides when to slam on the brakes to occasionally take 100 times longer than usual to encode
> its commands.
- [Solarflare](https://solarflare.com/), which makes highly-specialized network hardware, points out variance (jitter) as a big concern for [electronic trading](https://solarflare.com/electronic-trading/):
> The high stakes world of electronic trading, investment banks, market makers, hedge funds and exchanges demand the **lowest possible latency and jitter** while utilizing the highest bandwidth and return on their investment.
- [Solarflare](https://solarflare.com/), which makes highly-specialized network hardware, points out
variance (jitter) as a big concern for
[electronic trading](https://solarflare.com/electronic-trading/):
> The high stakes world of electronic trading, investment banks, market makers, hedge funds and
> exchanges demand the **lowest possible latency and jitter** while utilizing the highest
> bandwidth and return on their investment.
And to further clarify: we're not discussing _total run-time_, but variance of total run-time. There are situations where it's not reasonably possible to make things faster, and you'd much rather be consistent. For example, trading firms use [wireless networks](https://sniperinmahwah.wordpress.com/2017/06/07/network-effects-part-i/) because the speed of light through air is faster than through fiber-optic cables. There's still at _absolute minimum_ a [~33.76 millisecond](http://tinyurl.com/y2vd7tn8) delay required to send data between, say, [Chicago and Tokyo](https://www.theice.com/market-data/connectivity-and-feeds/wireless/tokyo-chicago). If a trading system in Chicago calls the function for "send order to Tokyo" and waits to see if a trade occurs, there's a physical limit to how long that will take. In this situation, the focus is on keeping variance of _additional processing_ to a minimum, since speed of light is the limiting factor.
And to further clarify: we're not discussing _total run-time_, but variance of total run-time. There
are situations where it's not reasonably possible to make things faster, and you'd much rather be
consistent. For example, trading firms use
[wireless networks](https://sniperinmahwah.wordpress.com/2017/06/07/network-effects-part-i/) because
the speed of light through air is faster than through fiber-optic cables. There's still at _absolute
minimum_ a [~33.76 millisecond](http://tinyurl.com/y2vd7tn8) delay required to send data between,
say,
[Chicago and Tokyo](https://www.theice.com/market-data/connectivity-and-feeds/wireless/tokyo-chicago).
If a trading system in Chicago calls the function for "send order to Tokyo" and waits to see if a
trade occurs, there's a physical limit to how long that will take. In this situation, the focus is
on keeping variance of _additional processing_ to a minimum, since speed of light is the limiting
factor.
So how does one go about looking for and eliminating performance variance? To tell the truth, I don't think a systematic answer or flow-chart exists. There's no substitute for (A) building a deep understanding of the entire technology stack, and (B) actually measuring system performance (though (C) watching a lot of [CppCon](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMlGfpWw-RUdWX_JbLCukXg) videos for inspiration never hurt). Even then, every project cares about performance to a different degree; you may need to build an entire [replica production system](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH1Tta7purM&feature=youtu.be&t=3015) to accurately benchmark at nanosecond precision, or you may be content to simply [avoid garbage collection](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BD9cRbxWQx8&feature=youtu.be&t=1335) in your Java code.
So how does one go about looking for and eliminating performance variance? To tell the truth, I
don't think a systematic answer or flow-chart exists. There's no substitute for (A) building a deep
understanding of the entire technology stack, and (B) actually measuring system performance (though
(C) watching a lot of [CppCon](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMlGfpWw-RUdWX_JbLCukXg) videos for
inspiration never hurt). Even then, every project cares about performance to a different degree; you
may need to build an entire
[replica production system](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH1Tta7purM&feature=youtu.be&t=3015) to
accurately benchmark at nanosecond precision, or you may be content to simply
[avoid garbage collection](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BD9cRbxWQx8&feature=youtu.be&t=1335) in
your Java code.
Even though everyone has different needs, there are still common things to look for when trying to isolate and eliminate variance. In no particular order, these are my focus areas when thinking about high-performance systems:
Even though everyone has different needs, there are still common things to look for when trying to
isolate and eliminate variance. In no particular order, these are my focus areas when thinking about
high-performance systems:
## Language-specific
**Garbage Collection**: How often does garbage collection happen? When is it triggered? What are the impacts?
**Garbage Collection**: How often does garbage collection happen? When is it triggered? What are the
impacts?
- [In Python](https://rushter.com/blog/python-garbage-collector/), individual objects are collected if the reference count reaches 0, and each generation is collected if `num_alloc - num_dealloc > gc_threshold` whenever an allocation happens. The GIL is acquired for the duration of generational collection.
- Java has [many](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/12/gctuning/parallel-collector1.html#GUID-DCDD6E46-0406-41D1-AB49-FB96A50EB9CE) [different](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/12/gctuning/garbage-first-garbage-collector.html#GUID-ED3AB6D3-FD9B-4447-9EDF-983ED2F7A573) [collection](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/12/gctuning/garbage-first-garbage-collector-tuning.html#GUID-90E30ACA-8040-432E-B3A0-1E0440AB556A) [algorithms](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/12/gctuning/z-garbage-collector1.html#GUID-A5A42691-095E-47BA-B6DC-FB4E5FAA43D0) to choose from, each with different characteristics. The default algorithms (Parallel GC in Java 8, G1 in Java 9) freeze the JVM while collecting, while more recent algorithms ([ZGC](https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/zgc) and [Shenandoah](https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/shenandoah)) are designed to keep "stop the world" to a minimum by doing collection work in parallel.
- [In Python](https://rushter.com/blog/python-garbage-collector/), individual objects are collected
if the reference count reaches 0, and each generation is collected if
`num_alloc - num_dealloc > gc_threshold` whenever an allocation happens. The GIL is acquired for
the duration of generational collection.
- Java has
[many](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/12/gctuning/parallel-collector1.html#GUID-DCDD6E46-0406-41D1-AB49-FB96A50EB9CE)
[different](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/12/gctuning/garbage-first-garbage-collector.html#GUID-ED3AB6D3-FD9B-4447-9EDF-983ED2F7A573)
[collection](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/12/gctuning/garbage-first-garbage-collector-tuning.html#GUID-90E30ACA-8040-432E-B3A0-1E0440AB556A)
[algorithms](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/12/gctuning/z-garbage-collector1.html#GUID-A5A42691-095E-47BA-B6DC-FB4E5FAA43D0)
to choose from, each with different characteristics. The default algorithms (Parallel GC in Java
8, G1 in Java 9) freeze the JVM while collecting, while more recent algorithms
([ZGC](https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/zgc) and
[Shenandoah](https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/shenandoah)) are designed to keep "stop the
world" to a minimum by doing collection work in parallel.
**Allocation**: Every language has a different way of interacting with "heap" memory, but the principle is the same: running the allocator to allocate/deallocate memory takes time that can often be put to better use. Understanding when your language interacts with the allocator is crucial, and not always obvious. For example: C++ and Rust don't allocate heap memory for iterators, but Java does (meaning potential GC pauses). Take time to understand heap behavior (I made a [a guide for Rust](/2019/02/understanding-allocations-in-rust.html)), and look into alternative allocators ([jemalloc](http://jemalloc.net/), [tcmalloc](https://gperftools.github.io/gperftools/tcmalloc.html)) that might run faster than the operating system default.
**Allocation**: Every language has a different way of interacting with "heap" memory, but the
principle is the same: running the allocator to allocate/deallocate memory takes time that can often
be put to better use. Understanding when your language interacts with the allocator is crucial, and
not always obvious. For example: C++ and Rust don't allocate heap memory for iterators, but Java
does (meaning potential GC pauses). Take time to understand heap behavior (I made a
[a guide for Rust](/2019/02/understanding-allocations-in-rust.html)), and look into alternative
allocators ([jemalloc](http://jemalloc.net/),
[tcmalloc](https://gperftools.github.io/gperftools/tcmalloc.html)) that might run faster than the
operating system default.
**Data Layout**: How your data is arranged in memory matters; [data-oriented design](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yy8jQgmhbAU) and [cache locality](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EWejmkKlxs&feature=youtu.be&t=1185) can have huge impacts on performance. The C family of languages (C, value types in C#, C++) and Rust all have guarantees about the shape every object takes in memory that others (e.g. Java and Python) can't make. [Cachegrind](http://valgrind.org/docs/manual/cg-manual.html) and kernel [perf](https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page) counters are both great for understanding how performance relates to memory layout.
**Data Layout**: How your data is arranged in memory matters;
[data-oriented design](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yy8jQgmhbAU) and
[cache locality](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EWejmkKlxs&feature=youtu.be&t=1185) can have huge
impacts on performance. The C family of languages (C, value types in C#, C++) and Rust all have
guarantees about the shape every object takes in memory that others (e.g. Java and Python) can't
make. [Cachegrind](http://valgrind.org/docs/manual/cg-manual.html) and kernel
[perf](https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page) counters are both great for understanding
how performance relates to memory layout.
**Just-In-Time Compilation**: Languages that are compiled on the fly (LuaJIT, C#, Java, PyPy) are great because they optimize your program for how it's actually being used, rather than how a compiler expects it to be used. However, there's a variance problem if the program stops executing while waiting for translation from VM bytecode to native code. As a remedy, many languages support ahead-of-time compilation in addition to the JIT versions ([CoreRT](https://github.com/dotnet/corert) in C# and [GraalVM](https://www.graalvm.org/) in Java). On the other hand, LLVM supports [Profile Guided Optimization](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#profile-guided-optimization), which theoretically brings JIT benefits to non-JIT languages. Finally, be careful to avoid comparing apples and oranges during benchmarks; you don't want your code to suddenly speed up because the JIT compiler kicked in.
**Just-In-Time Compilation**: Languages that are compiled on the fly (LuaJIT, C#, Java, PyPy) are
great because they optimize your program for how it's actually being used, rather than how a
compiler expects it to be used. However, there's a variance problem if the program stops executing
while waiting for translation from VM bytecode to native code. As a remedy, many languages support
ahead-of-time compilation in addition to the JIT versions
([CoreRT](https://github.com/dotnet/corert) in C# and [GraalVM](https://www.graalvm.org/) in Java).
On the other hand, LLVM supports
[Profile Guided Optimization](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#profile-guided-optimization),
which theoretically brings JIT benefits to non-JIT languages. Finally, be careful to avoid comparing
apples and oranges during benchmarks; you don't want your code to suddenly speed up because the JIT
compiler kicked in.
**Programming Tricks**: These won't make or break performance, but can be useful in specific circumstances. For example, C++ can use [templates instead of branches](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH1Tta7purM&feature=youtu.be&t=1206) in critical sections.
**Programming Tricks**: These won't make or break performance, but can be useful in specific
circumstances. For example, C++ can use
[templates instead of branches](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH1Tta7purM&feature=youtu.be&t=1206)
in critical sections.
## Kernel
Code you wrote is almost certainly not the _only_ code running on your hardware. There are many ways the operating system interacts with your program, from interrupts to system calls, that are important to watch for. These are written from a Linux perspective, but Windows does typically have equivalent functionality.
Code you wrote is almost certainly not the _only_ code running on your hardware. There are many ways
the operating system interacts with your program, from interrupts to system calls, that are
important to watch for. These are written from a Linux perspective, but Windows does typically have
equivalent functionality.
**Scheduling**: The kernel is normally free to schedule any process on any core, so it's important to reserve CPU cores exclusively for the important programs. There are a few parts to this: first, limit the CPU cores that non-critical processes are allowed to run on by excluding cores from scheduling ([`isolcpus`](https://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/linux_kernel/kernel_configuration/re46.html) kernel command-line option), or by setting the `init` process CPU affinity ([`systemd` example](https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2884991)). Second, set critical processes to run on the isolated cores by setting the [processor affinity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Processor_affinity) using [taskset](https://linux.die.net/man/1/taskset). Finally, use [`NO_HZ`](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/timers/NO_HZ.txt) or [`chrt`](https://linux.die.net/man/1/chrt) to disable scheduling interrupts. Turning off hyper-threading is also likely beneficial.
**Scheduling**: The kernel is normally free to schedule any process on any core, so it's important
to reserve CPU cores exclusively for the important programs. There are a few parts to this: first,
limit the CPU cores that non-critical processes are allowed to run on by excluding cores from
scheduling
([`isolcpus`](https://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/linux_kernel/kernel_configuration/re46.html)
kernel command-line option), or by setting the `init` process CPU affinity
([`systemd` example](https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2884991)). Second, set critical processes
to run on the isolated cores by setting the
[processor affinity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Processor_affinity) using
[taskset](https://linux.die.net/man/1/taskset). Finally, use
[`NO_HZ`](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/timers/NO_HZ.txt) or
[`chrt`](https://linux.die.net/man/1/chrt) to disable scheduling interrupts. Turning off
hyper-threading is also likely beneficial.
**System calls**: Reading from a UNIX socket? Writing to a file? In addition to not knowing how long the I/O operation takes, these all trigger expensive [system calls (syscalls)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_call). To handle these, the CPU must [context switch](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context_switch) to the kernel, let the kernel operation complete, then context switch back to your program. We'd rather keep these [to a minimum](https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/the-birth-and-death-of-javascript) (see timestamp 18:20). [Strace](https://linux.die.net/man/1/strace) is your friend for understanding when and where syscalls happen.
**System calls**: Reading from a UNIX socket? Writing to a file? In addition to not knowing how long
the I/O operation takes, these all trigger expensive
[system calls (syscalls)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_call). To handle these, the CPU must
[context switch](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context_switch) to the kernel, let the kernel
operation complete, then context switch back to your program. We'd rather keep these
[to a minimum](https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/the-birth-and-death-of-javascript) (see
timestamp 18:20). [Strace](https://linux.die.net/man/1/strace) is your friend for understanding when
and where syscalls happen.
**Signal Handling**: Far less likely to be an issue, but signals do trigger a context switch if your code has a handler registered. This will be highly dependent on the application, but you can [block signals](https://www.linuxprogrammingblog.com/all-about-linux-signals?page=show#Blocking_signals) if it's an issue.
**Signal Handling**: Far less likely to be an issue, but signals do trigger a context switch if your
code has a handler registered. This will be highly dependent on the application, but you can
[block signals](https://www.linuxprogrammingblog.com/all-about-linux-signals?page=show#Blocking_signals)
if it's an issue.
**Interrupts**: System interrupts are how devices connected to your computer notify the CPU that something has happened. The CPU will then choose a processor core to pause and context switch to the OS to handle the interrupt. Make sure that [SMP affinity](http://www.alexonlinux.com/smp-affinity-and-proper-interrupt-handling-in-linux) is set so that interrupts are handled on a CPU core not running the program you care about.
**Interrupts**: System interrupts are how devices connected to your computer notify the CPU that
something has happened. The CPU will then choose a processor core to pause and context switch to the
OS to handle the interrupt. Make sure that
[SMP affinity](http://www.alexonlinux.com/smp-affinity-and-proper-interrupt-handling-in-linux) is
set so that interrupts are handled on a CPU core not running the program you care about.
**[NUMA](https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/numa.html)**: While NUMA is good at making multi-cell systems transparent, there are variance implications; if the kernel moves a process across nodes, future memory accesses must wait for the controller on the original node. Use [numactl](https://linux.die.net/man/8/numactl) to handle memory-/cpu-cell pinning so this doesn't happen.
**[NUMA](https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/numa.html)**: While NUMA is good at making
multi-cell systems transparent, there are variance implications; if the kernel moves a process
across nodes, future memory accesses must wait for the controller on the original node. Use
[numactl](https://linux.die.net/man/8/numactl) to handle memory-/cpu-cell pinning so this doesn't
happen.
## Hardware
**CPU Pipelining/Speculation**: Speculative execution in modern processors gave us vulnerabilities like Spectre, but it also gave us performance improvements like [branch prediction](https://stackoverflow.com/a/11227902/1454178). And if the CPU mis-speculates your code, there's variance associated with rewind and replay. While the compiler knows a lot about how your CPU [pipelines instructions](https://youtu.be/nAbCKa0FzjQ?t=4467), code can be [structured to help](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH1Tta7purM&feature=youtu.be&t=755) the branch predictor.
**CPU Pipelining/Speculation**: Speculative execution in modern processors gave us vulnerabilities
like Spectre, but it also gave us performance improvements like
[branch prediction](https://stackoverflow.com/a/11227902/1454178). And if the CPU mis-speculates
your code, there's variance associated with rewind and replay. While the compiler knows a lot about
how your CPU [pipelines instructions](https://youtu.be/nAbCKa0FzjQ?t=4467), code can be
[structured to help](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH1Tta7purM&feature=youtu.be&t=755) the branch
predictor.
**Paging**: For most systems, virtual memory is incredible. Applications live in their own worlds, and the CPU/[MMU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_management_unit) figures out the details. However, there's a variance penalty associated with memory paging and caching; if you access more memory pages than the [TLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Translation_lookaside_buffer) can store, you'll have to wait for the page walk. Kernel perf tools are necessary to figure out if this is an issue, but using [huge pages](https://blog.pythian.com/performance-tuning-hugepages-in-linux/) can reduce TLB burdens. Alternately, running applications in a hypervisor like [Jailhouse](https://github.com/siemens/jailhouse) allows one to skip virtual memory entirely, but this is probably more work than the benefits are worth.
**Paging**: For most systems, virtual memory is incredible. Applications live in their own worlds,
and the CPU/[MMU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_management_unit) figures out the details.
However, there's a variance penalty associated with memory paging and caching; if you access more
memory pages than the [TLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Translation_lookaside_buffer) can store,
you'll have to wait for the page walk. Kernel perf tools are necessary to figure out if this is an
issue, but using [huge pages](https://blog.pythian.com/performance-tuning-hugepages-in-linux/) can
reduce TLB burdens. Alternately, running applications in a hypervisor like
[Jailhouse](https://github.com/siemens/jailhouse) allows one to skip virtual memory entirely, but
this is probably more work than the benefits are worth.
**Network Interfaces**: When more than one computer is involved, variance can go up dramatically. Tuning kernel [network parameters](https://github.com/leandromoreira/linux-network-performance-parameters) may be helpful, but modern systems more frequently opt to skip the kernel altogether with a technique called [kernel bypass](https://blog.cloudflare.com/kernel-bypass/). This typically requires specialized hardware and [drivers](https://www.openonload.org/), but even industries like [telecom](https://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/blog/2018-04-high-speed-networking-open-source-kernel-bypass) are finding the benefits.
**Network Interfaces**: When more than one computer is involved, variance can go up dramatically.
Tuning kernel
[network parameters](https://github.com/leandromoreira/linux-network-performance-parameters) may be
helpful, but modern systems more frequently opt to skip the kernel altogether with a technique
called [kernel bypass](https://blog.cloudflare.com/kernel-bypass/). This typically requires
specialized hardware and [drivers](https://www.openonload.org/), but even industries like
[telecom](https://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/blog/2018-04-high-speed-networking-open-source-kernel-bypass) are
finding the benefits.
## Networks
**Routing**: There's a reason financial firms are willing to pay [millions of euros](https://sniperinmahwah.wordpress.com/2019/03/26/4-les-moeres-english-version/) for rights to a small plot of land - having a straight-line connection from point A to point B means the path their data takes is the shortest possible. In contrast, there are currently 6 computers in between me and Google, but that may change at any moment if my ISP realizes a [more efficient route](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Gateway_Protocol) is available. Whether it's using [research-quality equipment](https://sniperinmahwah.wordpress.com/2018/05/07/shortwave-trading-part-i-the-west-chicago-tower-mystery/) for shortwave radio, or just making sure there's no data inadvertently going between data centers, routing matters.
**Routing**: There's a reason financial firms are willing to pay
[millions of euros](https://sniperinmahwah.wordpress.com/2019/03/26/4-les-moeres-english-version/)
for rights to a small plot of land - having a straight-line connection from point A to point B means
the path their data takes is the shortest possible. In contrast, there are currently 6 computers in
between me and Google, but that may change at any moment if my ISP realizes a
[more efficient route](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Gateway_Protocol) is available. Whether
it's using
[research-quality equipment](https://sniperinmahwah.wordpress.com/2018/05/07/shortwave-trading-part-i-the-west-chicago-tower-mystery/)
for shortwave radio, or just making sure there's no data inadvertently going between data centers,
routing matters.
**Protocol**: TCP as a network protocol is awesome: guaranteed and in-order delivery, flow control, and congestion control all built in. But these attributes make the most sense when networking infrastructure is lossy; for systems that expect nearly all packets to be delivered correctly, the setup handshaking and packet acknowledgment are just overhead. Using UDP (unicast or multicast) may make sense in these contexts as it avoids the chatter needed to track connection state, and [gap-fill](https://iextrading.com/docs/IEX%20Transport%20Specification.pdf) [strategies](http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/content/technicalsupport/specifications/dataproducts/moldudp64.pdf) can handle the rest.
**Protocol**: TCP as a network protocol is awesome: guaranteed and in-order delivery, flow control,
and congestion control all built in. But these attributes make the most sense when networking
infrastructure is lossy; for systems that expect nearly all packets to be delivered correctly, the
setup handshaking and packet acknowledgment are just overhead. Using UDP (unicast or multicast) may
make sense in these contexts as it avoids the chatter needed to track connection state, and
[gap-fill](https://iextrading.com/docs/IEX%20Transport%20Specification.pdf)
[strategies](http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/content/technicalsupport/specifications/dataproducts/moldudp64.pdf)
can handle the rest.
**Switching**: Many routers/switches handle packets using "store-and-forward" behavior: wait for the whole packet, validate checksums, and then send to the next device. In variance terms, the time needed to move data between two nodes is proportional to the size of that data; the switch must "store" all data before it can calculate checksums and "forward" to the next node. With ["cut-through"](https://www.networkworld.com/article/2241573/latency-and-jitter--cut-through-design-pays-off-for-arista--blade.html) designs, switches will begin forwarding data as soon as they know where the destination is, checksums be damned. This means there's a fixed cost (at the switch) for network traffic, no matter the size.
**Switching**: Many routers/switches handle packets using "store-and-forward" behavior: wait for the
whole packet, validate checksums, and then send to the next device. In variance terms, the time
needed to move data between two nodes is proportional to the size of that data; the switch must
"store" all data before it can calculate checksums and "forward" to the next node. With
["cut-through"](https://www.networkworld.com/article/2241573/latency-and-jitter--cut-through-design-pays-off-for-arista--blade.html)
designs, switches will begin forwarding data as soon as they know where the destination is,
checksums be damned. This means there's a fixed cost (at the switch) for network traffic, no matter
the size.
# Final Thoughts
High-performance systems, regardless of industry, are not magical. They do require extreme precision and attention to detail, but they're designed, built, and operated by regular people, using a lot of tools that are publicly available. Interested in seeing how context switching affects performance of your benchmarks? `taskset` should be installed in all modern Linux distributions, and can be used to make sure the OS never migrates your process. Curious how often garbage collection triggers during a crucial operation? Your language of choice will typically expose details of its operations ([Python](https://docs.python.org/3/library/gc.html), [Java](https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/tech/vmoptions-jsp-140102.html#DebuggingOptions)). Want to know how hard your program is stressing the TLB? Use `perf record` and look for `dtlb_load_misses.miss_causes_a_walk`.
High-performance systems, regardless of industry, are not magical. They do require extreme precision
and attention to detail, but they're designed, built, and operated by regular people, using a lot of
tools that are publicly available. Interested in seeing how context switching affects performance of
your benchmarks? `taskset` should be installed in all modern Linux distributions, and can be used to
make sure the OS never migrates your process. Curious how often garbage collection triggers during a
crucial operation? Your language of choice will typically expose details of its operations
([Python](https://docs.python.org/3/library/gc.html),
[Java](https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/tech/vmoptions-jsp-140102.html#DebuggingOptions)).
Want to know how hard your program is stressing the TLB? Use `perf record` and look for
`dtlb_load_misses.miss_causes_a_walk`.
Two final guiding questions, then: first, before attempting to apply some of the technology above to your own systems, can you first identify [where/when you care](http://wiki.c2.com/?PrematureOptimization) about "high-performance"? As an example, if parts of a system rely on humans pushing buttons, CPU pinning won't have any measurable effect. Humans are already far too slow to react in time. Second, if you're using benchmarks, are they being designed in a way that's actually helpful? Tools like [Criterion](http://www.serpentine.com/criterion/) (also in [Rust](https://github.com/bheisler/criterion.rs)) and Google's [Benchmark](https://github.com/google/benchmark) output not only average run time, but variance as well; your benchmarking environment is subject to the same concerns your production environment is.
Two final guiding questions, then: first, before attempting to apply some of the technology above to
your own systems, can you first identify
[where/when you care](http://wiki.c2.com/?PrematureOptimization) about "high-performance"? As an
example, if parts of a system rely on humans pushing buttons, CPU pinning won't have any measurable
effect. Humans are already far too slow to react in time. Second, if you're using benchmarks, are
they being designed in a way that's actually helpful? Tools like
[Criterion](http://www.serpentine.com/criterion/) (also in
[Rust](https://github.com/bheisler/criterion.rs)) and Google's
[Benchmark](https://github.com/google/benchmark) output not only average run time, but variance as
well; your benchmarking environment is subject to the same concerns your production environment is.
Finally, I believe high-performance systems are a matter of philosophy, not necessarily technique. Rigorous focus on variance is the first step, and there are plenty of ways to measure and mitigate it; once that's at an acceptable level, then optimize for speed.
Finally, I believe high-performance systems are a matter of philosophy, not necessarily technique.
Rigorous focus on variance is the first step, and there are plenty of ways to measure and mitigate
it; once that's at an acceptable level, then optimize for speed.

189
_posts/2019-09-28-binary-format-shootout.md
View File

@ -6,29 +6,32 @@ category:
tags: [rust]
---
I've found that in many personal projects, [analysis paralysis](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analysis_paralysis)
is particularly deadly. Making good decisions in the beginning avoids pain and suffering later;
if extra research prevents future problems, I'm happy to continue ~~procrastinating~~ researching indefinitely.
I've found that in many personal projects,
[analysis paralysis](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analysis_paralysis) is particularly deadly.
Making good decisions in the beginning avoids pain and suffering later; if extra research prevents
future problems, I'm happy to continue ~~procrastinating~~ researching indefinitely.
So let's say you're in need of a binary serialization format. Data will be going over the network, not just in memory,
so having a schema document and code generation is a must. Performance is crucial, so formats that support zero-copy
de/serialization are given priority. And the more languages supported, the better; I use Rust,
but can't predict what other languages this could interact with.
So let's say you're in need of a binary serialization format. Data will be going over the network,
not just in memory, so having a schema document and code generation is a must. Performance is
crucial, so formats that support zero-copy de/serialization are given priority. And the more
languages supported, the better; I use Rust, but can't predict what other languages this could
interact with.
Given these requirements, the candidates I could find were:
1. [Cap'n Proto](https://capnproto.org/) has been around the longest, and is the most established
2. [Flatbuffers](https://google.github.io/flatbuffers/) is the newest, and claims to have a simpler encoding
3. [Simple Binary Encoding](https://github.com/real-logic/simple-binary-encoding) has the simplest encoding,
but the Rust implementation is unmaintained
2. [Flatbuffers](https://google.github.io/flatbuffers/) is the newest, and claims to have a simpler
encoding
3. [Simple Binary Encoding](https://github.com/real-logic/simple-binary-encoding) has the simplest
encoding, but the Rust implementation is unmaintained
Any one of these will satisfy the project requirements: easy to transmit over a network, reasonably fast,
and polyglot support. But how do you actually pick one? It's impossible to know what issues will follow that choice,
so I tend to avoid commitment until the last possible moment.
Any one of these will satisfy the project requirements: easy to transmit over a network, reasonably
fast, and polyglot support. But how do you actually pick one? It's impossible to know what issues
will follow that choice, so I tend to avoid commitment until the last possible moment.
Still, a choice must be made. Instead of worrying about which is "the best," I decided to build a small
proof-of-concept system in each format and pit them against each other. All code can be found in the
[repository](https://github.com/speice-io/marketdata-shootout) for this post.
Still, a choice must be made. Instead of worrying about which is "the best," I decided to build a
small proof-of-concept system in each format and pit them against each other. All code can be found
in the [repository](https://github.com/speice-io/marketdata-shootout) for this post.
We'll discuss more in detail, but a quick preview of the results:
@ -39,17 +42,19 @@ We'll discuss more in detail, but a quick preview of the results:
# Prologue: Binary Parsing with Nom
Our benchmark system will be a simple data processor; given depth-of-book market data from
[IEX](https://iextrading.com/trading/market-data/#deep), serialize each message into the schema format,
read it back, and calculate total size of stock traded and the lowest/highest quoted prices. This test
isn't complex, but is representative of the project I need a binary format for.
[IEX](https://iextrading.com/trading/market-data/#deep), serialize each message into the schema
format, read it back, and calculate total size of stock traded and the lowest/highest quoted prices.
This test isn't complex, but is representative of the project I need a binary format for.
But before we make it to that point, we have to actually read in the market data. To do so, I'm using a library
called [`nom`](https://github.com/Geal/nom). Version 5.0 was recently released and brought some big changes,
so this was an opportunity to build a non-trivial program and get familiar.
But before we make it to that point, we have to actually read in the market data. To do so, I'm
using a library called [`nom`](https://github.com/Geal/nom). Version 5.0 was recently released and
brought some big changes, so this was an opportunity to build a non-trivial program and get
familiar.
If you don't already know about `nom`, it's a "parser generator". By combining different smaller parsers,
you can assemble a parser to handle complex structures without writing tedious code by hand.
For example, when parsing [PCAP files](https://www.winpcap.org/ntar/draft/PCAP-DumpFileFormat.html#rfc.section.3.3):
If you don't already know about `nom`, it's a "parser generator". By combining different smaller
parsers, you can assemble a parser to handle complex structures without writing tedious code by
hand. For example, when parsing
[PCAP files](https://www.winpcap.org/ntar/draft/PCAP-DumpFileFormat.html#rfc.section.3.3):
```
0 1 2 3
@ -108,45 +113,57 @@ pub fn enhanced_packet_block(input: &[u8]) -> IResult<&[u8], &[u8]> {
While this example isn't too interesting, more complex formats (like IEX market data) are where
[`nom` really shines](https://github.com/speice-io/marketdata-shootout/blob/369613843d39cfdc728e1003123bf87f79422497/src/iex.rs).
Ultimately, because the `nom` code in this shootout was the same for all formats, we're not too interested in its performance.
Still, it's worth mentioning that building the market data parser was actually fun; I didn't have to write tons of boring code by hand.
Ultimately, because the `nom` code in this shootout was the same for all formats, we're not too
interested in its performance. Still, it's worth mentioning that building the market data parser was
actually fun; I didn't have to write tons of boring code by hand.
# Part 1: Cap'n Proto
Now it's time to get into the meaty part of the story. Cap'n Proto was the first format I tried because of how long
it has supported Rust (thanks to [dwrensha](https://github.com/dwrensha) for maintaining the Rust port since
[2014!](https://github.com/capnproto/capnproto-rust/releases/tag/rustc-0.10)). However, I had a ton of performance concerns
once I started using it.
Now it's time to get into the meaty part of the story. Cap'n Proto was the first format I tried
because of how long it has supported Rust (thanks to [dwrensha](https://github.com/dwrensha) for
maintaining the Rust port since
[2014!](https://github.com/capnproto/capnproto-rust/releases/tag/rustc-0.10)). However, I had a ton
of performance concerns once I started using it.
To serialize new messages, Cap'n Proto uses a "builder" object. This builder allocates memory on the heap to hold the message
content, but because builders [can't be re-used](https://github.com/capnproto/capnproto-rust/issues/111), we have to allocate
a new buffer for every single message. I was able to work around this with a
To serialize new messages, Cap'n Proto uses a "builder" object. This builder allocates memory on the
heap to hold the message content, but because builders
[can't be re-used](https://github.com/capnproto/capnproto-rust/issues/111), we have to allocate a
new buffer for every single message. I was able to work around this with a
[special builder](https://github.com/speice-io/marketdata-shootout/blob/369613843d39cfdc728e1003123bf87f79422497/src/capnp_runner.rs#L17-L51)
that could re-use the buffer, but it required reading through Cap'n Proto's
[benchmarks](https://github.com/capnproto/capnproto-rust/blob/master/benchmark/benchmark.rs#L124-L156)
to find an example, and used [`std::mem::transmute`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/mem/fn.transmute.html) to bypass Rust's borrow checker.
to find an example, and used
[`std::mem::transmute`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/mem/fn.transmute.html) to bypass Rust's borrow
checker.
The process of reading messages was better, but still had issues. Cap'n Proto has two message encodings: a ["packed"](https://capnproto.org/encoding.html#packing)
representation, and an "unpacked" version. When reading "packed" messages, we need a buffer to unpack the message into before we can use it;
Cap'n Proto allocates a new buffer for each message we unpack, and I wasn't able to figure out a way around that.
In contrast, the unpacked message format should be where Cap'n Proto shines; its main selling point is that there's [no decoding step](https://capnproto.org/).
However, accomplishing zero-copy deserialization required code in the private API ([since fixed](https://github.com/capnproto/capnproto-rust/issues/148)),
and we allocate a vector on every read for the segment table.
The process of reading messages was better, but still had issues. Cap'n Proto has two message
encodings: a ["packed"](https://capnproto.org/encoding.html#packing) representation, and an
"unpacked" version. When reading "packed" messages, we need a buffer to unpack the message into
before we can use it; Cap'n Proto allocates a new buffer for each message we unpack, and I wasn't
able to figure out a way around that. In contrast, the unpacked message format should be where Cap'n
Proto shines; its main selling point is that there's [no decoding step](https://capnproto.org/).
However, accomplishing zero-copy deserialization required code in the private API
([since fixed](https://github.com/capnproto/capnproto-rust/issues/148)), and we allocate a vector on
every read for the segment table.
In the end, I put in significant work to make Cap'n Proto as fast as possible, but there were too many issues for me to feel comfortable
using it long-term.
In the end, I put in significant work to make Cap'n Proto as fast as possible, but there were too
many issues for me to feel comfortable using it long-term.
# Part 2: Flatbuffers
This is the new kid on the block. After a [first attempt](https://github.com/google/flatbuffers/pull/3894) didn't pan out,
official support was [recently launched](https://github.com/google/flatbuffers/pull/4898). Flatbuffers intends to address
the same problems as Cap'n Proto: high-performance, polyglot, binary messaging. The difference is that Flatbuffers claims
to have a simpler wire format and [more flexibility](https://google.github.io/flatbuffers/flatbuffers_benchmarks.html).
This is the new kid on the block. After a
[first attempt](https://github.com/google/flatbuffers/pull/3894) didn't pan out, official support
was [recently launched](https://github.com/google/flatbuffers/pull/4898). Flatbuffers intends to
address the same problems as Cap'n Proto: high-performance, polyglot, binary messaging. The
difference is that Flatbuffers claims to have a simpler wire format and
[more flexibility](https://google.github.io/flatbuffers/flatbuffers_benchmarks.html).
On the whole, I enjoyed using Flatbuffers; the [tooling](https://crates.io/crates/flatc-rust) is nice, and unlike
Cap'n Proto, parsing messages was actually zero-copy and zero-allocation. However, there were still some issues.
On the whole, I enjoyed using Flatbuffers; the [tooling](https://crates.io/crates/flatc-rust) is
nice, and unlike Cap'n Proto, parsing messages was actually zero-copy and zero-allocation. However,
there were still some issues.
First, Flatbuffers (at least in Rust) can't handle nested vectors. This is a problem for formats like the following:
First, Flatbuffers (at least in Rust) can't handle nested vectors. This is a problem for formats
like the following:
```
table Message {
@ -157,51 +174,61 @@ table MultiMessage {
}
```
We want to create a `MultiMessage` which contains a vector of `Message`, and each `Message` itself contains a vector (the `string` type).
I was able to work around this by [caching `Message` elements](https://github.com/speice-io/marketdata-shootout/blob/e9d07d148bf36a211a6f86802b313c4918377d1b/src/flatbuffers_runner.rs#L83)
in a `SmallVec` before building the final `MultiMessage`, but it was a painful process that I believe contributed to poor serialization performance.
We want to create a `MultiMessage` which contains a vector of `Message`, and each `Message` itself
contains a vector (the `string` type). I was able to work around this by
[caching `Message` elements](https://github.com/speice-io/marketdata-shootout/blob/e9d07d148bf36a211a6f86802b313c4918377d1b/src/flatbuffers_runner.rs#L83)
in a `SmallVec` before building the final `MultiMessage`, but it was a painful process that I
believe contributed to poor serialization performance.
Second, streaming support in Flatbuffers seems to be something of an [afterthought](https://github.com/google/flatbuffers/issues/3898).
Where Cap'n Proto in Rust handles reading messages from a stream as part of the API, Flatbuffers just sticks a `u32` at the front of each
message to indicate the size. Not specifically a problem, but calculating message size without that tag is nigh on impossible.
Second, streaming support in Flatbuffers seems to be something of an
[afterthought](https://github.com/google/flatbuffers/issues/3898). Where Cap'n Proto in Rust handles
reading messages from a stream as part of the API, Flatbuffers just sticks a `u32` at the front of
each message to indicate the size. Not specifically a problem, but calculating message size without
that tag is nigh on impossible.
Ultimately, I enjoyed using Flatbuffers, and had to do significantly less work to make it perform well.
Ultimately, I enjoyed using Flatbuffers, and had to do significantly less work to make it perform
well.
# Part 3: Simple Binary Encoding
Support for SBE was added by the author of one of my favorite
[Rust blog posts](https://web.archive.org/web/20190427124806/https://polysync.io/blog/session-types-for-hearty-codecs/).
I've [talked previously]({% post_url 2019-06-31-high-performance-systems %}) about how important variance is in
high-performance systems, so it was encouraging to read about a format that
[directly addressed](https://github.com/real-logic/simple-binary-encoding/wiki/Why-Low-Latency) my concerns. SBE has by far
the simplest binary format, but it does make some tradeoffs.
I've [talked previously]({% post_url 2019-06-31-high-performance-systems %}) about how important
variance is in high-performance systems, so it was encouraging to read about a format that
[directly addressed](https://github.com/real-logic/simple-binary-encoding/wiki/Why-Low-Latency) my
concerns. SBE has by far the simplest binary format, but it does make some tradeoffs.
Both Cap'n Proto and Flatbuffers use [message offsets](https://capnproto.org/encoding.html#structs) to handle
variable-length data, [unions](https://capnproto.org/language.html#unions), and various other features. In contrast,
messages in SBE are essentially [just structs](https://github.com/real-logic/simple-binary-encoding/blob/master/sbe-samples/src/main/resources/example-schema.xml);
Both Cap'n Proto and Flatbuffers use [message offsets](https://capnproto.org/encoding.html#structs)
to handle variable-length data, [unions](https://capnproto.org/language.html#unions), and various
other features. In contrast, messages in SBE are essentially
[just structs](https://github.com/real-logic/simple-binary-encoding/blob/master/sbe-samples/src/main/resources/example-schema.xml);
variable-length data is supported, but there's no union type.
As mentioned in the beginning, the Rust port of SBE works well, but is
[essentially unmaintained](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/zero-cost-abstraction-frontier-no-copy-low-allocation-ordered-decoding/11515/9).
However, if you don't need union types, and can accept that schemas are XML documents, it's still worth using. SBE's implementation
had the best streaming support of all formats I tested, and doesn't trigger allocation during de/serialization.
However, if you don't need union types, and can accept that schemas are XML documents, it's still
worth using. SBE's implementation had the best streaming support of all formats I tested, and
doesn't trigger allocation during de/serialization.
# Results
After building a test harness [for](https://github.com/speice-io/marketdata-shootout/blob/master/src/capnp_runner.rs)
After building a test harness
[for](https://github.com/speice-io/marketdata-shootout/blob/master/src/capnp_runner.rs)
[each](https://github.com/speice-io/marketdata-shootout/blob/master/src/flatbuffers_runner.rs)
[format](https://github.com/speice-io/marketdata-shootout/blob/master/src/sbe_runner.rs),
it was time to actually take them for a spin. I used
[this script](https://github.com/speice-io/marketdata-shootout/blob/master/run_shootout.sh) to run the benchmarks,
and the raw results are [here](https://github.com/speice-io/marketdata-shootout/blob/master/shootout.csv). All data
reported below is the average of 10 runs on a single day of IEX data. Results were validated to make sure
[format](https://github.com/speice-io/marketdata-shootout/blob/master/src/sbe_runner.rs), it was
time to actually take them for a spin. I used
[this script](https://github.com/speice-io/marketdata-shootout/blob/master/run_shootout.sh) to run
the benchmarks, and the raw results are
[here](https://github.com/speice-io/marketdata-shootout/blob/master/shootout.csv). All data reported
below is the average of 10 runs on a single day of IEX data. Results were validated to make sure
that each format parsed the data correctly.
## Serialization
This test measures, on a
[per-message basis](https://github.com/speice-io/marketdata-shootout/blob/master/src/main.rs#L268-L272),
how long it takes to serialize the IEX message into the desired format and write to a pre-allocated buffer.
how long it takes to serialize the IEX message into the desired format and write to a pre-allocated
buffer.
| Schema | Median | 99th Pctl | 99.9th Pctl | Total |
| :------------------- | :----- | :-------- | :---------- | :----- |
@ -214,9 +241,9 @@ how long it takes to serialize the IEX message into the desired format and write
This test measures, on a
[per-message basis](https://github.com/speice-io/marketdata-shootout/blob/master/src/main.rs#L294-L298),
how long it takes to read the previously-serialized message and
perform some basic aggregation. The aggregation code is the same for each format,
so any performance differences are due solely to the format implementation.
how long it takes to read the previously-serialized message and perform some basic aggregation. The
aggregation code is the same for each format, so any performance differences are due solely to the
format implementation.
| Schema | Median | 99th Pctl | 99.9th Pctl | Total |
| :------------------- | :----- | :-------- | :---------- | :----- |
@ -227,10 +254,10 @@ so any performance differences are due solely to the format implementation.
# Conclusion
Building a benchmark turned out to be incredibly helpful in making a decision; because a
"union" type isn't important to me, I can be confident that SBE best addresses my needs.
Building a benchmark turned out to be incredibly helpful in making a decision; because a "union"
type isn't important to me, I can be confident that SBE best addresses my needs.
While SBE was the fastest in terms of both median and worst-case performance, its worst case
performance was proportionately far higher than any other format. It seems to be that de/serialization
time scales with message size, but I'll need to do some more research to understand what exactly
is going on.
performance was proportionately far higher than any other format. It seems to be that
de/serialization time scales with message size, but I'll need to do some more research to understand
what exactly is going on.

102
_posts/2019-12-14-release-the-gil.md
View File

@ -6,11 +6,26 @@ category:
tags: [python]
---
Complaining about the [Global Interpreter Lock](https://wiki.python.org/moin/GlobalInterpreterLock) (GIL) seems like a rite of passage for Python developers. It's easy to criticize a design decision made before multi-core CPU's were widely available, but the fact that it's still around indicates that it generally works [Good](https://wiki.c2.com/?PrematureOptimization) [Enough](https://wiki.c2.com/?YouArentGonnaNeedIt). Besides, there are simple and effective workarounds; it's not hard to start a [new process](https://docs.python.org/3/library/multiprocessing.html) and use message passing to synchronize code running in parallel.
Complaining about the [Global Interpreter Lock](https://wiki.python.org/moin/GlobalInterpreterLock)
(GIL) seems like a rite of passage for Python developers. It's easy to criticize a design decision
made before multi-core CPU's were widely available, but the fact that it's still around indicates
that it generally works [Good](https://wiki.c2.com/?PrematureOptimization)
[Enough](https://wiki.c2.com/?YouArentGonnaNeedIt). Besides, there are simple and effective
workarounds; it's not hard to start a
[new process](https://docs.python.org/3/library/multiprocessing.html) and use message passing to
synchronize code running in parallel.
Still, wouldn't it be nice to have more than a single active interpreter thread? In an age of asynchronicity and _M:N_ threading, Python seems lacking. The ideal scenario is to take advantage of both Python's productivity and the modern CPU's parallel capabilities.
Still, wouldn't it be nice to have more than a single active interpreter thread? In an age of
asynchronicity and _M:N_ threading, Python seems lacking. The ideal scenario is to take advantage of
both Python's productivity and the modern CPU's parallel capabilities.
Presented below are two strategies for releasing the GIL's icy grip without giving up on what makes Python a nice language to start with. Bear in mind: these are just the tools, no claim is made about whether it's a good idea to use them. Very often, unlocking the GIL is an [XY problem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem); you want application performance, and the GIL seems like an obvious bottleneck. Remember that any gains from running code in parallel come at the expense of project complexity; messing with the GIL is ultimately messing with Python's memory model.
Presented below are two strategies for releasing the GIL's icy grip without giving up on what makes
Python a nice language to start with. Bear in mind: these are just the tools, no claim is made about
whether it's a good idea to use them. Very often, unlocking the GIL is an
[XY problem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem); you want application performance, and the
GIL seems like an obvious bottleneck. Remember that any gains from running code in parallel come at
the expense of project complexity; messing with the GIL is ultimately messing with Python's memory
model.
```python
%load_ext Cython
@ -21,12 +36,23 @@ N = 1_000_000_000
# Cython
Put simply, [Cython](https://cython.org/) is a programming language that looks a lot like Python, gets [transpiled](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source-to-source_compiler) to C/C++, and integrates well with the [CPython](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPython) API. It's great for building Python wrappers to C and C++ libraries, writing optimized code for numerical processing, and tons more. And when it comes to managing the GIL, there are two special features:
Put simply, [Cython](https://cython.org/) is a programming language that looks a lot like Python,
gets [transpiled](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source-to-source_compiler) to C/C++, and integrates
well with the [CPython](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPython) API. It's great for building Python
wrappers to C and C++ libraries, writing optimized code for numerical processing, and tons more. And
when it comes to managing the GIL, there are two special features:
- The `nogil` [function annotation](https://cython.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/userguide/external_C_code.html#declaring-a-function-as-callable-without-the-gil) asserts that a Cython function is safe to use without the GIL, and compilation will fail if it interacts with Python in an unsafe manner
- The `with nogil` [context manager](https://cython.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/userguide/external_C_code.html#releasing-the-gil) explicitly unlocks the CPython GIL while active
- The `nogil`
[function annotation](https://cython.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/userguide/external_C_code.html#declaring-a-function-as-callable-without-the-gil)
asserts that a Cython function is safe to use without the GIL, and compilation will fail if it
interacts with Python in an unsafe manner
- The `with nogil`
[context manager](https://cython.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/userguide/external_C_code.html#releasing-the-gil)
explicitly unlocks the CPython GIL while active
Whenever Cython code runs inside a `with nogil` block on a separate thread, the Python interpreter is unblocked and allowed to continue work elsewhere. We'll define a "busy work" function that demonstrates this principle in action:
Whenever Cython code runs inside a `with nogil` block on a separate thread, the Python interpreter
is unblocked and allowed to continue work elsewhere. We'll define a "busy work" function that
demonstrates this principle in action:
```python
%%cython
@ -84,7 +110,9 @@ _ = cython_nogil(N);
> Wall time: 388 ms
> </pre>
Both versions (with and without GIL) take effectively the same amount of time to run. Even when running this calculation in parallel on separate threads, it is expected that the run time will double because only one thread can be active at a time:
Both versions (with and without GIL) take effectively the same amount of time to run. Even when
running this calculation in parallel on separate threads, it is expected that the run time will
double because only one thread can be active at a time:
```python
%%time
@ -104,7 +132,8 @@ t1.join(); t2.join()
> Wall time: 645 ms
> </pre>
However, if the first thread releases the GIL, the second thread is free to acquire it and run in parallel:
However, if the first thread releases the GIL, the second thread is free to acquire it and run in
parallel:
```python
%%time
@ -120,7 +149,9 @@ t1.join(); t2.join()
> Wall time: 358 ms
> </pre>
Because `user` time represents the sum of processing time on all threads, it doesn't change much. The ["wall time"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elapsed_real_time) has been cut roughly in half because each function is running simultaneously.
Because `user` time represents the sum of processing time on all threads, it doesn't change much.
The ["wall time"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elapsed_real_time) has been cut roughly in half
because each function is running simultaneously.
Keep in mind that the **order in which threads are started** makes a difference!
@ -139,9 +170,11 @@ t1.join(); t2.join()
> Wall time: 672 ms
> </pre>
Even though the second thread releases the GIL while running, it can't start until the first has completed. Thus, the overall runtime is effectively the same as running two GIL-locked threads.
Even though the second thread releases the GIL while running, it can't start until the first has
completed. Thus, the overall runtime is effectively the same as running two GIL-locked threads.
Finally, be aware that attempting to unlock the GIL from a thread that doesn't own it will crash the **interpreter**, not just the thread attempting the unlock:
Finally, be aware that attempting to unlock the GIL from a thread that doesn't own it will crash the
**interpreter**, not just the thread attempting the unlock:
```python
%%cython
@ -165,15 +198,30 @@ cython_recurse(2)
> File "/usr/lib/python3.7/threading.py", line 890 in _bootstrap
> </pre>
In practice, avoiding this issue is simple. First, `nogil` functions probably shouldn't contain `with nogil` blocks. Second, Cython can [conditionally acquire/release](https://cython.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/userguide/external_C_code.html#conditional-acquiring-releasing-the-gil) the GIL, so these conditions can be used to synchronize access. Finally, Cython's documentation for [external C code](https://cython.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/userguide/external_C_code.html#acquiring-and-releasing-the-gil) contains more detail on how to safely manage the GIL.
In practice, avoiding this issue is simple. First, `nogil` functions probably shouldn't contain
`with nogil` blocks. Second, Cython can
[conditionally acquire/release](https://cython.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/userguide/external_C_code.html#conditional-acquiring-releasing-the-gil)
the GIL, so these conditions can be used to synchronize access. Finally, Cython's documentation for
[external C code](https://cython.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/userguide/external_C_code.html#acquiring-and-releasing-the-gil)
contains more detail on how to safely manage the GIL.
To conclude: use Cython's `nogil` annotation to assert that functions are safe for calling when the GIL is unlocked, and `with nogil` to actually unlock the GIL and run those functions.
To conclude: use Cython's `nogil` annotation to assert that functions are safe for calling when the
GIL is unlocked, and `with nogil` to actually unlock the GIL and run those functions.
# Numba
Like Cython, [Numba](https://numba.pydata.org/) is a "compiled Python." Where Cython works by compiling a Python-like language to C/C++, Numba compiles Python bytecode _directly to machine code_ at runtime. Behavior is controlled with a special `@jit` decorator; calling a decorated function first compiles it to machine code before running. Calling the function a second time re-uses that machine code unless the argument types have changed.
Like Cython, [Numba](https://numba.pydata.org/) is a "compiled Python." Where Cython works by
compiling a Python-like language to C/C++, Numba compiles Python bytecode _directly to machine code_
at runtime. Behavior is controlled with a special `@jit` decorator; calling a decorated function
first compiles it to machine code before running. Calling the function a second time re-uses that
machine code unless the argument types have changed.
Numba works best when a `nopython=True` argument is added to the `@jit` decorator; functions compiled in [`nopython`](http://numba.pydata.org/numba-doc/latest/user/jit.html?#nopython) mode avoid the CPython API and have performance comparable to C. Further, adding `nogil=True` to the `@jit` decorator unlocks the GIL while that function is running. Note that `nogil` and `nopython` are separate arguments; while it is necessary for code to be compiled in `nopython` mode in order to release the lock, the GIL will remain locked if `nogil=False` (the default).
Numba works best when a `nopython=True` argument is added to the `@jit` decorator; functions
compiled in [`nopython`](http://numba.pydata.org/numba-doc/latest/user/jit.html?#nopython) mode
avoid the CPython API and have performance comparable to C. Further, adding `nogil=True` to the
`@jit` decorator unlocks the GIL while that function is running. Note that `nogil` and `nopython`
are separate arguments; while it is necessary for code to be compiled in `nopython` mode in order to
release the lock, the GIL will remain locked if `nogil=False` (the default).
Let's repeat the same experiment, this time using Numba instead of Cython:
@ -284,7 +332,8 @@ t1.join(); t2.join()
> Wall time: 522 ms
> </pre>
Finally, unlike Cython, Numba will unlock the GIL if and only if it is currently acquired; recursively calling `@jit(nogil=True)` functions is perfectly safe:
Finally, unlike Cython, Numba will unlock the GIL if and only if it is currently acquired;
recursively calling `@jit(nogil=True)` functions is perfectly safe:
```python
from numba import jit
@ -301,10 +350,21 @@ numba_recurse(2);
# Conclusion
Before finishing, it's important to address pain points that will show up if these techniques are used in a more realistic project:
Before finishing, it's important to address pain points that will show up if these techniques are
used in a more realistic project:
First, code running in a GIL-free context will likely also need non-trivial data structures; GIL-free functions aren't useful if they're constantly interacting with Python objects whose access requires the GIL. Cython provides [extension types](http://docs.cython.org/en/latest/src/tutorial/cdef_classes.html) and Numba provides a [`@jitclass`](https://numba.pydata.org/numba-doc/dev/user/jitclass.html) decorator to address this need.
First, code running in a GIL-free context will likely also need non-trivial data structures;
GIL-free functions aren't useful if they're constantly interacting with Python objects whose access
requires the GIL. Cython provides
[extension types](http://docs.cython.org/en/latest/src/tutorial/cdef_classes.html) and Numba
provides a [`@jitclass`](https://numba.pydata.org/numba-doc/dev/user/jitclass.html) decorator to
address this need.
Second, building and distributing applications that make use of Cython/Numba can be complicated. Cython packages require running the compiler, (potentially) linking/packaging external dependencies, and distributing a binary wheel. Numba is generally simpler because the code being distributed is pure Python, but can be tricky since errors aren't detected until runtime.
Second, building and distributing applications that make use of Cython/Numba can be complicated.
Cython packages require running the compiler, (potentially) linking/packaging external dependencies,
and distributing a binary wheel. Numba is generally simpler because the code being distributed is
pure Python, but can be tricky since errors aren't detected until runtime.
Finally, while unlocking the GIL is often a solution in search of a problem, both Cython and Numba provide tools to directly manage the GIL when appropriate. This enables true parallelism (not just [concurrency](https://stackoverflow.com/a/1050257)) that is impossible in vanilla Python.
Finally, while unlocking the GIL is often a solution in search of a problem, both Cython and Numba
provide tools to directly manage the GIL when appropriate. This enables true parallelism (not just
[concurrency](https://stackoverflow.com/a/1050257)) that is impossible in vanilla Python.