mirror of
https://github.com/bspeice/speice.io
synced 2025-11-03 18:10:32 -05:00
Merge branch 'binary_shootout'
This commit is contained in:
@ -10,5 +10,3 @@ Best ways to get in contact:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
- Email: [bradlee@speice.io](mailto:bradlee@speice.io)
|
- Email: [bradlee@speice.io](mailto:bradlee@speice.io)
|
||||||
- LinkedIn: [bradleespeice](https://www.linkedin.com/in/bradleespeice/)
|
- LinkedIn: [bradleespeice](https://www.linkedin.com/in/bradleespeice/)
|
||||||
- Matrix (Chat): [@bspeice:matrix.com](https://matrix.to/#/@bspeice:matrix.com)
|
|
||||||
- Gitter (Chat): [bspeice](https://gitter.im/bspeice/Lobby)
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
236
_posts/2019-09-28-binary-format-shootout.md
Normal file
236
_posts/2019-09-28-binary-format-shootout.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,236 @@
|
|||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
layout: post
|
||||||
|
title: "Binary Format Shootout"
|
||||||
|
description: "Cap'n Proto vs. Flatbuffers vs. SBE"
|
||||||
|
category:
|
||||||
|
tags: [rust]
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I've found that in many personal projects, [analysis paralysis](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analysis_paralysis)
|
||||||
|
is particularly deadly. Making good decisions in the beginning avoids pain and suffering later;
|
||||||
|
if extra research prevents future problems, I'm happy to continue ~~procrastinating~~ researching indefinitely.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
So let's say you're in need of a binary serialization format. Data will be going over the network, not just in memory,
|
||||||
|
so having a schema document and code generation is a must. Performance is crucial; there's no reason to use Protocol Buffers
|
||||||
|
when other formats support similar features. And the more languages supported, the better; I use Rust,
|
||||||
|
but can't predict what other languages this could interact with.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Given these requirements, the candidates I could find were:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. [Cap'n Proto](https://capnproto.org/) has been around the longest, and is the most established
|
||||||
|
2. [Flatbuffers](https://google.github.io/flatbuffers/) is the newest, and claims to have a simpler encoding
|
||||||
|
3. [Simple Binary Encoding](https://github.com/real-logic/simple-binary-encoding) has the simplest encoding,
|
||||||
|
but the Rust implementation is unmaintained
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Any one of these will satisfy the project requirements: easy to transmit over a network, reasonably fast,
|
||||||
|
and polyglot support. But how do you actually pick one? It's impossible to know what issues will follow that choice,
|
||||||
|
so I tend to avoid commitment until the last possible moment.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Still, a choice must be made. Instead of worrying about which is "the best," I decided to build a small
|
||||||
|
proof-of-concept system in each format and pit them against each other. All code can be found in the
|
||||||
|
[repository](https://github.com/bspeice/speice.io-md_shootout) for this post.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We'll discuss more in detail, but a quick preview of the results:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Cap'n Proto: Theoretically performs incredibly well, the implementation had issues
|
||||||
|
- Flatbuffers: Has some quirks, but largely lived up to its "zero-copy" promises
|
||||||
|
- SBE: Best median and worst-case performance, but the message structure has a limited feature set
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Prologue: Binary Parsing with Nom
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Our benchmark system will be a simple data processor; given depth-of-book market data from
|
||||||
|
[IEX](https://iextrading.com/trading/market-data/#deep), serialize each message into the schema format,
|
||||||
|
read it back, and calculate total size of stock traded and the lowest/highest quoted prices. This test
|
||||||
|
isn't complex, but is representative of the project I need a binary format for.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
But before we make it to that point, we have to actually read in the market data. To do so, I'm using a library
|
||||||
|
called [`nom`](https://github.com/Geal/nom). Version 5.0 was recently released and brought some big changes,
|
||||||
|
so this was an opportunity to build a non-trivial program and get familiar.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If you don't already know about `nom`, it's a "parser generator". By combining different smaller parsers,
|
||||||
|
you can assemble a parser to handle complex structures without writing tedious code by hand.
|
||||||
|
For example, when parsing [PCAP files](https://www.winpcap.org/ntar/draft/PCAP-DumpFileFormat.html#rfc.section.3.3):
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
0 1 2 3
|
||||||
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
|
||||||
|
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||||
|
0 | Block Type = 0x00000006 |
|
||||||
|
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||||
|
4 | Block Total Length |
|
||||||
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||||||
|
8 | Interface ID |
|
||||||
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||||||
|
12 | Timestamp (High) |
|
||||||
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||||||
|
16 | Timestamp (Low) |
|
||||||
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||||||
|
20 | Captured Len |
|
||||||
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||||||
|
24 | Packet Len |
|
||||||
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||||||
|
| Packet Data |
|
||||||
|
| ... |
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
...you can build a parser in `nom` that looks like
|
||||||
|
[this](https://github.com/bspeice/speice.io-md_shootout/blob/369613843d39cfdc728e1003123bf87f79422497/src/parsers.rs#L59-L93):
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```rust
|
||||||
|
const ENHANCED_PACKET: [u8; 4] = [0x06, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00];
|
||||||
|
pub fn enhanced_packet_block(input: &[u8]) -> IResult<&[u8], &[u8]> {
|
||||||
|
let (
|
||||||
|
remaining,
|
||||||
|
(
|
||||||
|
block_type,
|
||||||
|
block_len,
|
||||||
|
interface_id,
|
||||||
|
timestamp_high,
|
||||||
|
timestamp_low,
|
||||||
|
captured_len,
|
||||||
|
packet_len,
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
|
) = tuple((
|
||||||
|
tag(ENHANCED_PACKET),
|
||||||
|
le_u32,
|
||||||
|
le_u32,
|
||||||
|
le_u32,
|
||||||
|
le_u32,
|
||||||
|
le_u32,
|
||||||
|
le_u32,
|
||||||
|
))(input)?;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
let (remaining, packet_data) = take(captured_len)(remaining)?;
|
||||||
|
Ok((remaining, packet_data))
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
While this example isn't too interesting, more complex formats (like IEX market data) are where
|
||||||
|
[`nom` really shines](https://github.com/bspeice/speice.io-md_shootout/blob/369613843d39cfdc728e1003123bf87f79422497/src/iex.rs).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Ultimately, because the `nom` code in this shootout was the same for all formats, we're not too interested in its performance.
|
||||||
|
Still, it's worth mentioning that building the market data parser was actually fun; I didn't have to write tons of boring code by hand.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Part 1: Cap'n Proto
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Now it's time to get into the meaty part of the story. Cap'n Proto was the first format I tried because of how long
|
||||||
|
it has supported Rust (thanks to [dwrensha](https://github.com/dwrensha) for maintaining the Rust port since
|
||||||
|
[2014!](https://github.com/capnproto/capnproto-rust/releases/tag/rustc-0.10)). However, I had a ton of performance concerns
|
||||||
|
once I started using it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
To serialize new messages, Cap'n Proto uses a "builder" object. This builder allocates memory on the heap to hold the message
|
||||||
|
content, but because builders [can't be re-used](https://github.com/capnproto/capnproto-rust/issues/111), we have to allocate
|
||||||
|
a new buffer for every single message. I was able to work around this with a
|
||||||
|
[special builder](https://github.com/bspeice/speice.io-md_shootout/blob/369613843d39cfdc728e1003123bf87f79422497/src/capnp_runner.rs#L17-L51)
|
||||||
|
that could re-use the buffer, but it required reading through Cap'n Proto's
|
||||||
|
[benchmarks](https://github.com/capnproto/capnproto-rust/blob/master/benchmark/benchmark.rs#L124-L156)
|
||||||
|
to find an example, and used [`std::mem::transmute`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/mem/fn.transmute.html) to bypass Rust's borrow checker.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The process of reading messages was better, but still had issues. Cap'n Proto has two message encodings: a ["packed"](https://capnproto.org/encoding.html#packing)
|
||||||
|
representation, and an "unpacked" version. When reading "packed" messages, we need a buffer to unpack the message into before we can use it;
|
||||||
|
Cap'n Proto allocates a new buffer for each message we unpack, and I wasn't able to figure out a way around that.
|
||||||
|
In contrast, the unpacked message format should be where Cap'n Proto shines; its main selling point is that there's [no decoding step](https://capnproto.org/).
|
||||||
|
However, accomplishing zero-copy deserialization required code in the private API ([since fixed](https://github.com/capnproto/capnproto-rust/issues/148)),
|
||||||
|
and we allocate a vector on every read for the segment table.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In the end, I put in significant work to make Cap'n Proto as fast as possible, but there were too many issues for me to feel comfortable
|
||||||
|
using it long-term.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Part 2: Flatbuffers
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This is the new kid on the block. After a [first attempt](https://github.com/google/flatbuffers/pull/3894) didn't pan out,
|
||||||
|
official support was [recently launched](https://github.com/google/flatbuffers/pull/4898). Flatbuffers intends to address
|
||||||
|
the same problems as Cap'n Proto: high-performance, polyglot, binary messaging. The difference is that Flatbuffers claims
|
||||||
|
to have a simpler wire format and [more flexibility](https://google.github.io/flatbuffers/flatbuffers_benchmarks.html).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
On the whole, I enjoyed using Flatbuffers; the [tooling](https://crates.io/crates/flatc-rust) is nice, and unlike
|
||||||
|
Cap'n Proto, parsing messages was actually zero-copy and zero-allocation. However, there were still some issues.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
First, Flatbuffers (at least in Rust) can't handle nested vectors. This is a problem for formats like the following:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
table Message {
|
||||||
|
symbol: string;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
table MultiMessage {
|
||||||
|
messages:[Message];
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We want to create a `MultiMessage` which contains a vector of `Message`, and each `Message` itself contains a vector (the `string` type).
|
||||||
|
I was able to work around this by [caching `Message` elements](https://github.com/bspeice/speice.io-md_shootout/blob/e9d07d148bf36a211a6f86802b313c4918377d1b/src/flatbuffers_runner.rs#L83)
|
||||||
|
in a `SmallVec` before building the final `MultiMessage`, but it was a painful process that I believe contributed to poor serialization performance.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Second, streaming support in Flatbuffers seems to be something of an [afterthought](https://github.com/google/flatbuffers/issues/3898).
|
||||||
|
Where Cap'n Proto in Rust handles reading messages from a stream as part of the API, Flatbuffers just sticks a `u32` at the front of each
|
||||||
|
message to indicate the size. Not specifically a problem, but calculating message size without that tag is nigh on impossible.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Ultimately, I enjoyed using Flatbuffers, and had to do significantly less work to make it perform well.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Part 3: Simple Binary Encoding
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Support for SBE was added by the author of one of my favorite
|
||||||
|
[Rust blog posts](https://web.archive.org/web/20190427124806/https://polysync.io/blog/session-types-for-hearty-codecs/).
|
||||||
|
I've [talked previously]({% post_url 2019-06-31-high-performance-systems %}) about how important variance is in
|
||||||
|
high-performance systems, so it was encouraging to read about a format that
|
||||||
|
[directly addressed](https://github.com/real-logic/simple-binary-encoding/wiki/Why-Low-Latency) my concerns. SBE has by far
|
||||||
|
the simplest binary format, but it does make some tradeoffs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Both Cap'n Proto and Flatbuffers use [message offsets](https://capnproto.org/encoding.html#structs) to handle
|
||||||
|
variable-length data, [unions](https://capnproto.org/language.html#unions), and various other features. In contrast,
|
||||||
|
messages in SBE are essentially [just structs](https://github.com/real-logic/simple-binary-encoding/blob/master/sbe-samples/src/main/resources/example-schema.xml);
|
||||||
|
variable-length data is supported, but there's no union type.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
As mentioned in the beginning, the Rust port of SBE works well, but is
|
||||||
|
[essentially unmaintained](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/zero-cost-abstraction-frontier-no-copy-low-allocation-ordered-decoding/11515/9).
|
||||||
|
However, if you don't need union types, and can accept that schemas are XML documents, it's still worth using. SBE's implementation
|
||||||
|
had the best streaming support of all formats I tested, and doesn't trigger allocation during de/serialization.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Results
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
After building a test harness [for](https://github.com/bspeice/speice.io-md_shootout/blob/master/src/capnp_runner.rs)
|
||||||
|
[each](https://github.com/bspeice/speice.io-md_shootout/blob/master/src/flatbuffers_runner.rs)
|
||||||
|
[format](https://github.com/bspeice/speice.io-md_shootout/blob/master/src/sbe_runner.rs),
|
||||||
|
it was time to actually take them for a spin. I used
|
||||||
|
[this script](https://github.com/bspeice/speice.io-md_shootout/blob/master/run_shootout.sh) to run the benchmarks,
|
||||||
|
and the raw results are [here](https://github.com/bspeice/speice.io-md_shootout/blob/master/shootout.csv). All data
|
||||||
|
reported below is the average of 10 runs on a single day of IEX data. Results were validated to make sure
|
||||||
|
that each format parsed the data correctly.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Serialization
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This test measures, on a
|
||||||
|
[per-message basis](https://github.com/bspeice/speice.io-md_shootout/blob/master/src/main.rs#L268-L272),
|
||||||
|
how long it takes to serialize the IEX message into the desired format and write to a pre-allocated buffer.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Schema | Median | 99th Pctl | 99.9th Pctl | Total |
|
||||||
|
|:---------------------|:-------|:----------|:------------|:-------|
|
||||||
|
| Cap'n Proto Packed | 413ns | 1751ns | 2943ns | 14.80s |
|
||||||
|
| Cap'n Proto Unpacked | 273ns | 1828ns | 2836ns | 10.65s |
|
||||||
|
| Flatbuffers | 355ns | 2185ns | 3497ns | 14.31s |
|
||||||
|
| SBE | 91ns | 1535ns | 2423ns | 3.91s |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Deserialization
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This test measures, on a
|
||||||
|
[per-message basis](https://github.com/bspeice/speice.io-md_shootout/blob/master/src/main.rs#L294-L298),
|
||||||
|
how long it takes to read the previously-serialized message and
|
||||||
|
perform some basic aggregation. The aggregation code is the same for each format,
|
||||||
|
so any performance differences are due solely to the format implementation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Schema | Median | 99th Pctl | 99.9th Pctl | Total |
|
||||||
|
|:---------------------|:-------|:----------|:------------|:-------|
|
||||||
|
| Cap'n Proto Packed | 539ns | 1216ns | 2599ns | 18.92s |
|
||||||
|
| Cap'n Proto Unpacked | 366ns | 737ns | 1583ns | 12.32s |
|
||||||
|
| Flatbuffers | 173ns | 421ns | 1007ns | 6.00s |
|
||||||
|
| SBE | 116ns | 286ns | 659ns | 4.05s |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Conclusion
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Building a benchmark turned out to be incredibly helpful in making a decision; because a
|
||||||
|
"union" type isn't important to me, I can be confident that SBE best addresses my needs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
While SBE was the fastest in terms of both median and worst-case performance, its worst case
|
||||||
|
performance was proportionately far higher than any other format. It seems to be that de/serialization
|
||||||
|
time scales with message size, but I'll need to do some more research to understand what exactly
|
||||||
|
is going on.
|
||||||
@ -112,6 +112,18 @@
|
|||||||
border-bottom-style: dotted;
|
border-bottom-style: dotted;
|
||||||
border-bottom-width: 1px;
|
border-bottom-width: 1px;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
table {
|
||||||
|
border-collapse: collapse;
|
||||||
|
border-style: hidden;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
td, th {
|
||||||
|
padding-left: .1em;
|
||||||
|
padding-right: 2em;
|
||||||
|
border-style: solid;
|
||||||
|
border-width: .1em;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
.c-article__footer {
|
.c-article__footer {
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user