I was using const_cast<> incorrectly

This commit is contained in:
Bradlee Speice 2020-08-30 03:03:15 -04:00
parent fb29d8c9da
commit 5e25faf5fd

View File

@ -117,15 +117,15 @@ public:
Rust allows declaring immutable or mutable.
C++ can use `const_cast` to assert "constness" of `this`:
Can require object we're calling methods on to be `const`:
```c++
#include <concepts>
#include <cstdint>
template <typename T>
concept ConstMethod = requires (T a) {
{ const_cast<const T&>(a).method() } -> std::same_as<std::uint64_t>;
concept ConstMethod = requires (const T a) {
{ a.method() } -> std::same_as<std::uint64_t>;
};
std::uint64_t my_function(ConstMethod auto a) {
@ -176,7 +176,51 @@ int main() {
| ^~~~~~
```
...but can't mark `this` as consumed.
...which is equivalent to Rust's `&mut self`. Unlike Rust, can't mark `this` as consumed.
Alternate form: using `static_cast<>` allows mixing some methods that are `const`, some not:
```c++
#include <concepts>
#include <cstdint>
template <typename T>
concept ConstMethod = requires (T a) {
{ static_cast<const T>(a).const_method() } -> std::same_as<std::uint64_t>;
{ a.nonconst_method() } -> std::same_as<std::uint64_t>;
{ a.unnecessary_const_method() } -> std::same_as<std::uint64_t>;
};
std::uint64_t my_function(ConstMethod auto a) {
return a.method();
}
class HasConst {
public:
std::uint64_t const_method() const {
return 42;
}
std::uint64_t nonconst_method() {
return 42;
}
// Concept didn't require this to be `const`, but we can add the qualifier if we want.
std::uint64_t unnecessary_const_method() const {
return 42;
}
};
void f(ConstMethod auto x) {}
int main() {
auto x = HasConst{};
f(x);
}
```
May be better off defining `const T` methods in one concept, `T` methods in another, and then having
one concept that `requires` the sub-concepts, but just trying to demonstrate what is possible.
Working with `const` parameters can be a bit weird because of implicit copies: