mirror of
https://github.com/bspeice/speice.io
synced 2024-11-05 09:38:09 -05:00
Get the code finished, and half the blog post
This commit is contained in:
parent
7ecf6f86e0
commit
47e6f557a5
@ -1,102 +1,119 @@
|
|||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
layout: post
|
layout: post
|
||||||
title: "Isomorphic Desktop Apps with Rust"
|
title: "Isomorphic Desktop Apps with Rust"
|
||||||
description: "and other buzzwords"
|
description: "Electron + WASM = ☣"
|
||||||
category:
|
category:
|
||||||
tags: [rust, javascript]
|
tags: [rust, javascript, webassembly]
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Forgive me, but this is going to be a bit of a schizophrenic post. I both absolutely hate Javascript
|
Forgive me, but this is going to be a bit of a schizophrenic post. I both despise Javascript and the
|
||||||
and the modern ECMAScript ecosystem, and I'm stunned by its success at doing some things I think
|
modern ECMAScript ecosystem, and I'm stunned by its success at doing some things I think are really cool.
|
||||||
are really cool. And it's this duality that led me to a couple of nights up at 2 AM over the past
|
And it's [this duality](https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/the-birth-and-death-of-javascript)
|
||||||
weeks trying to reconcile myself.
|
that led me to a couple of (very) late nights over the past weeks trying to reconcile myself.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
See, as much as [Webassembly isn't trying to replace Javascript](https://webassembly.org/docs/faq/#is-webassembly-trying-to-replace-javascript),
|
See, as much as [Webassembly isn't trying to replace Javascript](https://webassembly.org/docs/faq/#is-webassembly-trying-to-replace-javascript),
|
||||||
**I want to replace Javascript**. I cringe every time I hear the word "Webpack",
|
**I want Javascript gone**. There are plenty of people who do not share my views, and they are probably
|
||||||
and I think it's hilarious that the [language specification](https://ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-402.htm)
|
nicer and more fun at parties. But I cringe every time "Webpack" is mentioned, and I think it's hilarious
|
||||||
dramatically outpaces anyone's ability [to actually implement](https://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es2016plus/)
|
that the [language specification](https://ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-402.htm)
|
||||||
the specification. The answer to this conundrum is of course to have a "polyfill" that actually recompiles
|
dramatically outpaces anyone's [actually implementing](https://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es2016plus/)
|
||||||
|
the spec. The answer to this conundrum is of course to have a "polyfill" that translates
|
||||||
code from newer versions of the language to older versions of the language. At least
|
code from newer versions of the language to older versions of the language. At least
|
||||||
[Babel][babel] is a nice tongue-in-cheek reference.
|
[Babel] is a nice tongue-in-cheek reference.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
And yet, for as much hate as [Electron][electron] receives, it does a stunningly good job at solving
|
And yet, for as much hate as [Electron] receives, it does a stunningly good job at solving
|
||||||
a really hard problem: *how the hell do I put a button on the screen and react when the user clicks it*?
|
a really hard problem: *how the hell do I put a button on the screen and react when the user clicks it*?
|
||||||
GUI programming is hard, straight up. But if browsers are already able to run everywhere, why don't
|
GUI programming is hard, straight up. But if browsers are already able to run everywhere, why don't
|
||||||
we take advantage of someone else solving the hard problems for us? Don't reinvent wheels. I hate
|
we take advantage of someone else solving the hard problems for us? Don't reinvent wheels. I don't like
|
||||||
that I have to use Javascript for it, but I apparently don't hate Javascript enough to want to
|
that I have to use Javascript for it, but I apparently don't mind Javascript enough that I feel inclined to
|
||||||
whip out good ol' [wxWidgets][wxwidgets].
|
whip out good ol' [wxWidgets].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Now, there are other "native" solutions ([libui-rs][libui-rs], [conrod][conrod], [oh hey wxWdidgets again!][wxRust]),
|
Now, there are other "native" solutions ([libui-rs], [conrod], [oh hey wxWdidgets again!][wxRust]),
|
||||||
but those also potentially have their own issues with distribution, styling, etc.
|
but those also potentially have their own issues with distribution, styling, etc.
|
||||||
With Electron, I can `yarn create electron-app my-app` and just get going, knowing that distribution/upgrades/etc.
|
With Electron, I can `yarn create electron-app my-app` and just get going, knowing that distribution/upgrades/etc.
|
||||||
are built in.
|
are built in.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
So the question I want to answer is: **Are we Electron yet**?
|
So the question is: given recent innovations with WASM, *are we Electron yet*?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<span style="color:white;">No. No we are not.</span>
|
No, not really.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Technology Survey
|
Instead, **what would it take to get to a point where we can skip Javascript in Electron apps?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The truth is, WASM/Webassembly is a pretty new technology, and there aren't a lot of nice tools. I knew going in
|
# Setting the Stage
|
||||||
that there were going to be some rough edges, but was curious to see what could be done. Before I get to that
|
|
||||||
though, I need to explain a little bit of what the state of play is. **If you're already familiar with the WASM ecosystem,
|
|
||||||
[skip ahead a bit](#building-an-electron-app).**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
First things first, we're going to skip [asm.js][asm.js] and [emscripten][emscripten]. Truth be told, I couldn't
|
Truth is, WASM/Webassembly is a pretty new technology and I'm generally unfamiliar with the tools.
|
||||||
get either of these to produce a usable binary, and so I'm just going to say [here be dragons.][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Here_be_dragons]
|
There may already be solutions to the issues I discuss, but I'm totally unaware of them,
|
||||||
|
so I'm going to try and organize what I know exists.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
So how does one go about producing a "Webassembly"? That's done by compiling to a separate *target*.
|
I should also mention that the content and things I'm talking about here are not intended to be prescriptive,
|
||||||
First, make sure the target is installed:
|
but more "if someone else is interested, where should you start?" *I expect everything in this post to be irrelevant
|
||||||
|
within two months.* Even over the course of writing this, [a blog post](https://mnt.io/2018/08/28/from-rust-to-beyond-the-asm-js-galaxy/)
|
||||||
|
was invalidated because [upstream changes](https://github.com/WebAssembly/binaryen/pull/1642)
|
||||||
|
broke [a Rust tool](https://github.com/rustwasm/wasm-bindgen/pull/787) that ultimately
|
||||||
|
[forced changes in the blog post](https://mnt.io/2018/08/28/from-rust-to-beyond-the-asm-js-galaxy/#comment-477).
|
||||||
|
**And all that happened within the span of a week.** Things are moving quickly.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```
|
I'll also note that we're going to skip [asm.js] and [emscripten]. Truth be told, I couldn't get either of these
|
||||||
rustup install nightly # Just trust me on this one
|
to produce anything, and so I'm just going to say [here be dragons.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Here_be_dragons)
|
||||||
rustup target add wasm32-unknown-unknown
|
Everything I'm discussing here is using the `wasm32-unknown-unknown` target.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
And the code that I *did* get running is available [over here](https://github.com/bspeice/isomorphic_rust).
|
||||||
|
Feel free to use that as a starting point, but I'm mostly including the link as a reference point for the things
|
||||||
|
that do and don't work.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# An Example Running Application
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
So, I did *technically* get a running application:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
![Electron app using WASM](/assets/images/2018-09-08-electron-percy-wasm.png)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
...which you can also try out if you want to:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```sh
|
||||||
|
git clone https://github.com/bspeice/isomorphic_rust.git
|
||||||
|
cd isomorphic_rust/percy
|
||||||
|
yarn install && yarn start
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
And then we can build the project with:
|
...but I really wouldn't use this as a "high quality" starting point. It's mostly just there
|
||||||
|
to prove that this is possible in the first place. And that's something to be proud of!
|
||||||
|
There's a huge amount of engineering that went into showing a window with the text "It's alive!".
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```
|
There's also a huge number of issues under the hood that prevent me from recommending anyone
|
||||||
cargo +nightly build --target=wasm32-unknown-unknown
|
try using Electron and WASM at the moment, and I think that's the more important thing to discuss.
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Now, this produces a Webassembly/WASM file (in `target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/debug/`) that we can load in the
|
# Issues:
|
||||||
browser. However, the resulting blob isn't really easy to use; you'd have to write a lot of extra code
|
|
||||||
for Javascript to figure out what functions are actually usable. Fortunately, [wasm-bindgen][wasm-bindgen]
|
|
||||||
handles a lot of that for you (and is part of why we need nightly). The end result is that we can
|
|
||||||
easily allow Javascript to access Rust code.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This only gets you one-direction communication though. If you want to interact with Javascript,
|
- Have to use wasm-bindgen so symbols get exported and are usable
|
||||||
[js-sys][js-sys] acts as a "header" library; it tells the Rust compiler "no trust me, these functions
|
- Have to use webpack/babel after bindgen so we can compile to something that's usable in a browser
|
||||||
will totally exist at runtime" and allows the compiler to generate your code.
|
- yew doesn't require wasm_bindgen, but doesn't link via webpack (env module) - think this is a stdweb issue
|
||||||
|
- Electron forces us to deal with MIME types - open webpack issue
|
||||||
|
- Incompatible low-level utilities - js-sys exists, but very fragmented with web-sys, stdweb, percy-webapis
|
||||||
|
- Keeping wasm-bindgen-cli updated:
|
||||||
|
error: failed to extract wasm-bindgen custom sections
|
||||||
|
caused by:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If you want to interact with the Browser the answer is a bit complicated at the moment.
|
it looks like the Rust project used to create this wasm file was linked against
|
||||||
There are currently [three][stdweb] [different][percy-webapis] [libraries][web-sys]
|
a different version of wasm-bindgen than this binary:
|
||||||
that seek to do that, and only one of them has made it past version `0.0.1` ([stdweb][stdweb], it's stdweb).
|
|
||||||
That said, I expect [web-sys][web-sys] to be the long-term solution, so keep an eye on that one.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
But we don't want to just interact with the browser, we want to build an entire application.
|
rust wasm file: 0.2.21
|
||||||
And since We Totally Need An Application Framework™, there are a couple of options available:
|
this binary: 0.2.17
|
||||||
[virtual-dom-rs][virtual-dom-rs] (a.k.a. [percy][percy]), and [yew][yew]. From what I gather,
|
|
||||||
`virtual-dom-rs` is attempting to be [React][react], and `yew` is attempting to be [elm][elm].
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Testing your applications is a bit tricky at the moment, and to be honest, I didn't manage to get that far.
|
Currently the bindgen format is unstable enough that these two version must
|
||||||
If you're brave though, [cargo-web][cargo-web] has some nice handling to actually run your tests
|
exactly match, so it's required that these two version are kept in sync by
|
||||||
inside a browser (we're using WASM, remember?). As a practical example, [percy][percy-test] has
|
either updating the wasm-bindgen dependency or this binary. You should be able
|
||||||
a unit test or two to demonstrate, but it's pretty basic so far.
|
to update the wasm-bindgen dependency with:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
And while we won't cover it here, if you want to ship Webassembly code to NPM, you can do that
|
cargo update -p wasm-bindgen
|
||||||
via [wasm-pack][wasm-pack]. It attempts to handle some of the difficult bits so that people who want
|
|
||||||
to use Javascript (not me) can get access to your code really easily.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
So, that's a quick tour of the state of play. Things are in the early stages, so it's a bit difficult
|
or you can update the binary with
|
||||||
to figure out who's doing what and why they exist, but this hopefully at least sets the stage.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Building an Electron App
|
cargo install -f wasm-bindgen-cli
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Now that you've managed to piece your way through a fragmented ecosystem ([not][gulpjs] [unlike][typescript]
|
if this warning fails to go away though and you're not sure what to do feel free
|
||||||
[current][vuejs] [ECMAScript](https://benmccormick.org/2015/09/14/es5-es6-es2016-es-next-whats-going-on-with-javascript-versioning/)),
|
to open an issue at https://github.com/rustwasm/wasm-bindgen/issues!
|
||||||
it's time to actually build an application. The code I'll be referring to is
|
|
||||||
[over here](https://github.com/bspeice/isomorphic_rust).
|
error Command failed with exit code 1.
|
||||||
|
info Visit https://yarnpkg.com/en/docs/cli/run for documentation about this command.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[wxwidgets]: https://wxwidgets.org/
|
[wxwidgets]: https://wxwidgets.org/
|
||||||
[libui-rs]: https://github.com/LeoTindall/libui-rs/
|
[libui-rs]: https://github.com/LeoTindall/libui-rs/
|
||||||
|
BIN
assets/images/2018-09-08-electron-percy-wasm.png
Normal file
BIN
assets/images/2018-09-08-electron-percy-wasm.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
After Width: | Height: | Size: 50 KiB |
Binary file not shown.
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 160 KiB |
Binary file not shown.
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 192 KiB |
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user