mirror of
https://github.com/bspeice/speice.io
synced 2024-12-23 00:58:09 -05:00
150 lines
4.3 KiB
Plaintext
150 lines
4.3 KiB
Plaintext
|
---
|
||
|
slug: 2024/11/playing-with-fire-transforms
|
||
|
title: "Playing with fire: Transforms and variations"
|
||
|
date: 2024-11-15 13:00:00
|
||
|
authors: [bspeice]
|
||
|
tags: []
|
||
|
---
|
||
|
|
||
|
Now that we have a basic chaos game in place, it's time to spice things up. Transforms and variations create the
|
||
|
interesting patterns that fractal flames are known for.
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!-- truncate -->
|
||
|
|
||
|
This blog post uses a set of reference parameters ([available here](../params.flame)) to demonstrate a practical
|
||
|
implementation of the fractal flame algorithm. If you're interested in tweaking the parameters, or generating
|
||
|
your own art, [Apophysis](https://sourceforge.net/projects/apophysis/) is a good introductory tool.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Transforms and variations
|
||
|
|
||
|
import CodeBlock from '@theme/CodeBlock'
|
||
|
|
||
|
We previously introduced "transforms" as the "functions" of an "iterated function system." Their general format is:
|
||
|
|
||
|
$$
|
||
|
F_i(x,y) = (a_i \cdot x + b_i \cdot y + c_i, \hspace{0.2cm} d_i \cdot x + e_i \cdot y + f_i)
|
||
|
$$
|
||
|
|
||
|
Let's also start defining some types we can use in our code. The transform coefficients are a good place to start:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```typescript
|
||
|
interface Coefs {
|
||
|
a: number, b: number, c: number,
|
||
|
d: number, e: number, f: number
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
We also introduced the Sierpinski Gasket functions ($F_0$, $F_1$, and $F_2$), demonstrating how they are related to
|
||
|
the general format. For example:
|
||
|
|
||
|
$$
|
||
|
\begin{align*}
|
||
|
F_0(x,y) &= \left({x \over 2}, {y \over 2}\right) \\
|
||
|
&= (a_0 \cdot x + b_0 \cdot y + c_o, d_0 \cdot x + e_0 \cdot y + f_0) \\
|
||
|
& a_0 = 0.5 \hspace{0.2cm} b_0 = 0 \hspace{0.2cm} c_0 = 0 \\
|
||
|
& d_0 = 0 \hspace{0.2cm} e_0 = 0.5 \hspace{0.2cm} f_0 = 0
|
||
|
\end{align*}
|
||
|
$$
|
||
|
|
||
|
However, these transforms are pretty boring. We can build more exciting images by using some additional functions
|
||
|
within the transform. These "sub-functions" are called "variations":
|
||
|
|
||
|
$$
|
||
|
F_i(x, y) = V_j(a_i \cdot x + b_i \cdot y + c_i, \hspace{0.2cm} d_i \cdot x + e_i \cdot y + f_i)
|
||
|
$$
|
||
|
|
||
|
The fractal flame paper lists 49 variation functions ($V_j$ above), but the sky's the limit here.
|
||
|
For example, the official `flam3` implementation supports
|
||
|
[98 variations](https://github.com/scottdraves/flam3/blob/7fb50c82e90e051f00efcc3123d0e06de26594b2/variations.c).
|
||
|
|
||
|
In code, variations are pretty easy:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```typescript
|
||
|
type Variation = (x: number, y: number) => [number, number];
|
||
|
````
|
||
|
|
||
|
Our reference image will focus on just four variations:
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Linear (variation 0)
|
||
|
|
||
|
This variation returns the $x$ and $y$ coordinates as-is. In a way, the Sierpinski Gasket is
|
||
|
a fractal flame using only the linear variation.
|
||
|
|
||
|
$$
|
||
|
V_0(x,y) = (x,y)
|
||
|
$$
|
||
|
|
||
|
```typescript
|
||
|
function linear(x: number, y: number) {
|
||
|
return [x, y];
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Julia (variation 13)
|
||
|
|
||
|
This variation still uses just the $x$ and $y$ coordinates, but does some crazy things with them:
|
||
|
|
||
|
<small>TODO: Is this related to the Julia set?</small>
|
||
|
|
||
|
$$
|
||
|
\begin{align*}
|
||
|
r &= \sqrt{x^2 + y^2} \\
|
||
|
\theta &= \text{arctan}(x / y) \\
|
||
|
\Omega &= \left\{
|
||
|
\begin{array}{lr}
|
||
|
0 \hspace{0.4cm} \text{w.p. } 0.5 \\
|
||
|
\pi \hspace{0.4cm} \text{w.p. } 0.5 \\
|
||
|
\end{array}
|
||
|
\right\} \\
|
||
|
|
||
|
V_{13}(x, y) &= \sqrt{r} \cdot (\text{cos} ( \theta / 2 + \Omega ), \text{sin} ( \theta / 2 + \Omega ))
|
||
|
\end{align*}
|
||
|
$$
|
||
|
|
||
|
```typescript
|
||
|
function julia(x: number, y: number) {
|
||
|
const r = Math.sqrt(Math.pow(x, 2) + Math.pow(y, 2));
|
||
|
const theta = Math.atan2(x, y);
|
||
|
const omega = Math.random() > 0.5 ? 0 : Math.PI;
|
||
|
|
||
|
return [
|
||
|
r * Math.cos(theta / 2 + omega),
|
||
|
r * Math.sin(theta / 2 + omega)
|
||
|
]
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Popcorn (variation 17)
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is known as a "dependent variation" because it depends on knowing the transform coefficients:
|
||
|
|
||
|
$$
|
||
|
V_{17}(x,y) = (x + c \cdot \text{sin}(\text{tan }3y), y + f \cdot \text{sin}(\text{tan }3x))
|
||
|
$$
|
||
|
|
||
|
```typescript
|
||
|
function popcorn({c, f}: Coefs) {
|
||
|
return (x: number, y: number) => [
|
||
|
x + c * Math.sin(Math.tan(3 * y)),
|
||
|
y + f * Math.sin(Math.tan(3 * x))
|
||
|
]
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
### PDJ (variation 24)
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is known as a "parametric" variation because it has additional parameters given to it:
|
||
|
|
||
|
$$
|
||
|
p_1 = \text{pdj.a} \hspace{0.2cm} p_2 = \text{pdj.b} \hspace{0.2cm} p_3 = \text{pdj.c} \hspace{0.2cm} p_4 = \text{pdj.d} \\
|
||
|
V_{24} = (\text{sin}(p_1 \cdot y) - \text{cos}(p_2 \cdot x), \text{sin}(p_3 \cdot x) - \text{cos}(p_4 \cdot y))
|
||
|
$$
|
||
|
|
||
|
```typescript
|
||
|
function pdj(a: number, b: number, c: number, d: number) {
|
||
|
return (x: number, y: number) => [
|
||
|
Math.sin(a * y) - Math.cos(b * x),
|
||
|
Math.sin(c * x) - Math.cos(d * y)
|
||
|
]
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
```
|